Client-side protection
Asked as “client-side protection tool”, and as “tool to monitor third-party scripts on payment pages”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
18%
Contested · Cloudflare Page Shield 16%
18cside16Cloudflare Page Shield10Feroot Security55others
18% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+5Since October 2026: 13% → 18%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.cside held the lead, +5 points on 13%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Microsoft Defender for Cloud19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Microsoft Defender for Cloud (19%) replaces cside (14% then, 17% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
cside18%Contested▲+5Since October 2026: 13% → 18%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
Feroot Security16%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Feroot Security (16%) replaces cside (17% then, 14% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →
Microsoft Defender for Cloud19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Microsoft Defender for Cloud (19%) replaces cside (14% then, 17% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketcside18%Contested▲+5Since October 2026: 13% → 18%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseFeroot Security16%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Feroot Security (16%) replaces cside (17% then, 14% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01cside18%4%28accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 13% → 18%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.13% → 18%
cside18%4%28accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 13% → 18%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.13% → 18%02
Cloudflare Page Shield16%14%29accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 7% → 16%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 16%
Cloudflare Page Shield16%14%29accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 7% → 16%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 16%03Feroot Security10%4%25accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 0% → 10%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 10%
Feroot Security10%4%25accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 0% → 10%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 10%04
Reflectiz10%31%32criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 11% → 10%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 10%
Reflectiz10%31%32criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 11% → 10%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 10%05
Source Defense2%26%23criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Source Defense2%26%23criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%06
Feroot PaymentGuard2%29%14criticized challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 2%
Feroot PaymentGuard2%29%14criticized challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity0%36%33criticized challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 0%
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity0%36%33criticized challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 0%09
HUMAN Security0%28%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
HUMAN Security0%28%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Imperva Client-Side Protection0%25%20criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Imperva Client-Side Protection0%25%20criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%07
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance0%10%20accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 0%
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance0%10%20accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
cside vs Source Defensecside vs Feroot PaymentGuardCloudflare Page Shield vs Feroot SecurityCloudflare Page Shield vs ReflectizCloudflare Page Shield vs Source DefenseCloudflare Page Shield vs Feroot PaymentGuardFeroot Security vs ReflectizFeroot Security vs Source DefenseFeroot Security vs Feroot PaymentGuardReflectiz vs Source DefenseReflectiz vs Feroot PaymentGuardSource Defense vs Feroot PaymentGuard
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01cside18%
cside18%02Cloudflare Page Shield16%
Cloudflare Page Shield16%03Feroot Security10%
Feroot Security10%04Reflectiz10%
Reflectiz10%05Source Defense2%
Source Defense2%06Feroot PaymentGuard2%
Feroot PaymentGuard2%07Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance0%
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance0%08Imperva Client-Side Protection0%
Imperva Client-Side Protection0%09HUMAN Security0%
HUMAN Security0%10Jscrambler Webpage Integrity0%
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Jscrambler Webpage Integrity36%
12 of 33 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“JavaScript-based obfuscation, minification, or code scramblers (e.g., JScrambler, similar tools from Source Defense or others)... Use only for IP protection (if needed), not security.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Reflectiz31%
10 of 32 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Client-side monitoring, sandboxing, or behavioral detection tools (e.g., those from Reflectiz, Feroot, Human Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Source Defense) ... ineffective against sophisticated attacks” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Source Defense26%
6 of 23 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Tools that rely solely on client-side JavaScript agents or sandboxing (such as those from vendors like JScrambler, SourceDefense, Reflectiz, and Human Security) are often criticized.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
HUMAN Security28%
5 of 18 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“avoid treating browser-resident JavaScript agents, script scramblers/obfuscators, and Human Security / SourceDefense / Reflectiz / Jscrambler-style runtime monitors as a primary or standalone defense” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
67 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 799 links across 203 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 94 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · cside40 answers · 84 citations · 13 models
vendor site · G229 answers · 58 citations · 12 models
publisher (Gane)28 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow27 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · SourceForge19 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Feroot17 answers · 34 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Reflectiz17 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 19 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Jscrambler15 answers · 22 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Akamai15 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Cloudflare13 answers · 28 citations · 4 models
13 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
26 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 11 models
15 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 5 models
9 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best client-side protection tool”, “client-side protection tool”, “client-side protection tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cside cside.com cside 18%, c/side 2% | 20% | 83 | 1,900 | 0 | 3,519 | 2 | 4 | |
| Cloudflare parent site Cloudflare Page Shield 16% | 16% | 77 | 550,000 | 10,897 | ||||
| Feroot Security feroot.com Feroot Security 10%, Feroot PaymentGuard 2% | 12% | 56 | 70 | 1 | 4,806 | $62 | 7 | |
| Reflectiz reflectiz.com | 10% | 92 | 320 | 0 | 1,811 | 26 | ||
| Microsoft Defender parent site Microsoft Defender for Endpoint 10% | 10% | 264 | 18,100 | 3,525 | ||||
| Microsoft Defender microsoft.com Microsoft Defender for Cloud 8% | 8% | 659 | 18,100 | 3,525 | 145,358,109 company | $12,455 | 103 | |
| Monity monity.ai | 8% | 17 | ||||||
| Source Defense sourcedefense.com | 2% | 57 | 170 | 16 | 713 | 2 | ||
| CrowdStrike parent site CrowdStrike Falcon 2% | 2% | 201 | 74,000 | 5,130 | ||||
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Defender Antivirus 2% | 2% | 3 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (akamai.com, cside.com, g2.com, jscrambler.com, startupstash.com). The first result for “best client-side protection tool” is imperva.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best client-side protection tool for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which tool to monitor third-party scripts on payment pages would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top client-side protection tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best client-side protection tool for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a client-side protection tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which client-side protection tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceFeroot PaymentGuard, csideChangedno first choiceagainst: Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot PaymentGuard, ReflectizMicrosoft Defender for Endpointno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Aperia Compliance Script MonitorThree alternatives
Avast Free Security, Bitdefender, MalwarebytesGPT-5.4 minino first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceMicrosoft Defender for Cloudno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Bitdefender GravityZone Business SecurityGemini 3.5 FlashReflectizCloudflare Page Shield, ReflectizChangedagainst: HUMAN Code Defender, Jscrambler Webpage IntegrityAkamai Client-Side Protection & ComplianceMicrosoft Defender for Cloudagainst: Feroot PaymentGuard, HUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrityno first choiceagainst: BattlEye, Easy Anti-Cheat, Riot Vanguard
Three alternatives
Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Security, Jscrambler Webpage IntegrityTwo alternatives
Feroot Security, Source DefenseSeven alternatives
Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense, csideFour alternatives
Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security, Cloudflare, Report URI, Sophos Intercept XPerplexity SonarSource Defenseagainst: Cloudflare Page ShieldReflectizChangedcsideCloudflare Page Shieldno first choiceagainst: Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Two alternatives
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Jscrambler Webpage IntegrityTwo alternatives
Monity, csideNine alternatives
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare Page Shield, Fastly Client-Side Protection, Feroot PaymentGuard, FortiWeb client-side protection, HUMAN Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Source DefenseTwo alternatives
Detectify, csideGrok 4.20csideagainst: Jscrambler Webpage IntegrityMonity, csideChangedagainst: Akamai Page Integrity Manager, Cloudflare Page Shield, Imperva Client-Side Protectioncsideagainst: Detectify, Jscrambler Webpage IntegrityCloudflare Page Shieldagainst: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Imperva Client-Side Protection, OWASP ZAP, PerimeterX, Reflectiz, uBlock Originno first choiceagainst: Feroot PaymentGuard, HUMAN Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
Two alternatives
Feroot Security, ReflectizTwo alternatives
Feroot Inspector/PageGuard, ReflectizFour alternatives
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Security, Imperva Client-Side ProtectionTwo alternatives
Feroot Security, Microsoft Defender for CloudMistral SmallFeroot Security, csideFathom Analytics, Plausible AnalyticsChangedno first choiceCloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Securityagainst: csideno first choiceagainst: HUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
Two alternatives
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, otto-jsSix alternatives
Cloudflare Zaraz, Google Tag Manager (GTM) with custom triggers, Microsoft Clarity, PerimeterX, Pirsch Analytics, SentryOne alternative
Jscrambler Webpage IntegrityDeepSeek V4 FlashFeroot Securityc/sideChangedagainst: Cloudflare Page Shield, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, ScriptPatrolFeroot Security, csideagainst: Reflectizcsideno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Cloudflare Page Shield, Reflectiz, csideOne alternative
ReflectizFour alternatives
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare Page Shield, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Source DefenseOne alternative
Cloudflare Page ShieldLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceMonityChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Feroot PaymentGuard, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
Two alternatives
Script Monitoring, csideQwen 3.7 FlashFeroot SecurityNew Relic BrowserChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Defender for Endpointagainst: CrowdStrike, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint, WazuhMicrosoft Defender for Endpointagainst: CrowdStrike, Palo Alto, SentinelOne Singularity Endpointagainst: Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
Four alternatives
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare, HUMAN Security, Source DefenseTwo alternatives
Catchpoint Systems, Datadog Real User MonitoringTwo alternatives
Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security, Sophos Intercept XFour alternatives
Carbon Black, Exabeam, Sophos Intercept X, TaniumKimi K2Feroot Security, ReflectizReflectizChangedReflectizCloudflare Page Shield, Microsoft Defender Antivirusagainst: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Radware Client-Side Protectionno first choiceagainst: HUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense, otto-js
One alternative
csideTwo alternatives
Feroot Security, c/sideSix alternatives
Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Security, HUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Source Defense, c/sideTwo alternatives
Feroot Security, Microsoft Defender for CloudGLM 4.7 FlashXcsideMonityChangedJscrambler Webpage IntegrityCloudflare Page Shieldagainst: Feroot Securityno first choiceagainst: Adblock Plus, Avast Business, GhostPoster
Four alternatives
Feroot Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, ReflectizTwo alternatives
Reflectiz Security Hub, Squirrel PCIFour alternatives
Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot PaymentGuard, Reflectiz, csideTwo alternatives
Bitdefender GravityZone Small Business Security, Microsoft Defender for CloudMiniMax M2.5CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for EndpointMonity, SquirrelChangedHUMAN SecurityMicrosoft Defender for Endpointno first choicenothing named
One alternative
ESET Endpoint SecurityOne alternative
csideNine alternatives
Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare Page Shield, Detectify, Fastly Client‑Side Protection, Feroot Security, FortiWeb, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Source DefenseTwo alternatives
Bitdefender Free Edition, MalwarebytesGPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Defender for CloudcsideChangedCSP and Subresource IntegrityMicrosoft Defender for Cloudno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Sophos Intercept XTwo alternatives
Client-Side Security Advanced, ReflectizThree alternatives
Cloudflare Page Shield, Reflectiz, Source DefenseOne alternative
Microsoft Defender AntivirusMuse Glimmer 30BcsideCloudflare Page ShieldChangedagainst: DataDome Page Protect, Imperva Client-Side Protection, PylonSecAkamai Client-Side Protection & ComplianceCloudflare Page Shield, csideagainst: Reflectizno first choiceagainst: HUMAN Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense
One alternative
ReflectizOne alternative
cside PCI Shield / Privacy WatchEleven alternatives
Cloudflare Page Shield, Detectify, Fastly Client-Side Protection, Feroot Security, Fortinet FortiWeb, HUMAN Security, formerly PerimeterX, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, Reflectiz, Source Defense, csideThree alternatives
Avast Premium Business Security, Bitdefender Ultimate Small Business Security, Huntress Managed EDRBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:52 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:43 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:16 | yes | 7 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:47 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:54 | yes | 21 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:40 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 19 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 15 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 5 | 52 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 19:32 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:24 | yes | 22 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:50 | yes | 16 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:33 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:30 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:03 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:13 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:00 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:03 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:30 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 22 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:01 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:53 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 23 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:42 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:01 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:27 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:19 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:23 | yes | 23 | 41 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:12 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 22 | 48 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:11 | yes | 24 | 113 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 6 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 11 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:51 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:27 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:59 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:32 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 24 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:55 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:31 | yes | 25 | 102 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:32 | yes | 19 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 5 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:35 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:08 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:53 | yes | 9 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:57 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:04 | yes | 20 | 75 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:51 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:30 | yes | 20 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 5 | 69 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:27 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:28 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:10 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:41 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:41 | yes | 14 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:35 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:15 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:27 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 9 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 17 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:20 | yes | 25 | 85 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 14 | 94 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:09 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:52 | yes | 12 | 28 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Akamai read as Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance
Akamai Client-Side Protection read as Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance
Akamai Client‑Side Protection & Compliance read as Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance
Bitdefender GravityZone read as Bitdefender GravityZone Business Security
Cloudflare Application Security read as Cloudflare Page Shield
Cloudflare Application Security and Performance read as Cloudflare Page Shield
Cloudflare Client-Side Security read as Cloudflare Page Shield
Cloudflare Client-Side Security (Page Shield) read as Cloudflare Page Shield
Cloudflare Client-Side Security, formerly Page Shield read as Cloudflare Page Shield
Cloudflare Client-side Security read as Cloudflare Page Shield
Fastly read as Fastly Client-Side Protection
Feroot read as Feroot PaymentGuard
HUMAN read as HUMAN Security
HUMAN (PerimeterX) read as HUMAN Security
HUMAN (formerly PerimeterX) read as HUMAN Security
Imperva read as Imperva Client-Side Protection
JScrambler read as Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Jscrambler read as Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Microsoft Defender read as Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Radware read as Radware Client-Side Protection
SentinelOne read as SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
Sophos read as Sophos Intercept X
Windows Defender (Microsoft Defender) read as Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Unresolved, counted raw
Adblock Plus
Aperia Compliance Script Monitor
Avast Free Security
BattlEye
Bitdefender Free Edition
CSP and Subresource Integrity (SRI)
Catchpoint Systems
Chrome Enhanced Protection
Client-Side Security Advanced
Cloudflare Zaraz
Easy Anti-Cheat
Fastly Client‑Side Protection
Feroot Inspector/PageGuard
FortiWeb client-side protection
GhostPoster
Google Tag Manager (GTM) with custom triggers
HUMAN Code Defender
HUMAN Security, formerly PerimeterX
HUMAN's Client-Side Defense module
Harmony Endpoint Protection (Check Point)
Magecart & PCI 6.4.3 Check
Microsoft Edge SmartScreen
Pirsch Analytics
PylonSec
Reflectiz Security Hub
Riot Vanguard
ScriptPatrol
ServerScan.com
cside PCI Shield / Privacy Watch
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.