Jscrambler Webpage Integrity is a client-side protection product from Jscrambler for securing webpages · jscrambler.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is first at 19%.
cside is first at 18%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Feroot Security is first at 16%.
“Jscrambler (Code Integrity & Protection) ... Best For: SaaS companies, gaming platforms, and fintech firms that need to protect proprietary algorithms”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Comparative question · first choice
“Choose Jscrambler when protecting proprietary JavaScript from reverse engineering or tampering is the central requirement.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · alternative
“tools like Akamai Client-Side Protection, Imperva, Jscrambler, or Cloudflare Page Shield”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · alternative
“best when protecting proprietary JavaScript and payment pages is a priority”Perplexity Sonar · Direct question · alternative
“JavaScript-based obfuscation, minification, or code scramblers (e.g., JScrambler, similar tools from Source Defense or others)... Use only for IP protection (if needed), not security.”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“Tools like JScrambler and general obfuscators have significant limitations... Never rely on obfuscation to protect secrets, API keys, or credentials”Kimi K2 · Negative question · warning
“Obfuscation tools (e.g., JScrambler) may make it harder for casual observers to understand your code, but they do not provide real security.”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“"Tools that scramble your JavaScript code (like JSObfuscator or Jscrambler)" ... 11 of 30 labels negative for Jscrambler Webpage Integrity”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Jscrambler Webpage Integrity, over the 78 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 9 | View → | |
| 50 | 10 | View → | |
| 47 | 2 | View → | |
| 38 | 2 | View → | |
| 36 | 9 | View → | |
| 34 | 1 | View → | |
| 33 | 11 | View → | |
| 32 | 3 | View → | |
| 26 | 0 | View → | |
| 12 | 3 | View → |
What the models named instead of Jscrambler Webpage Integrity →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Jscrambler Webpage Integrity's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 75 of the 78 answers that named Jscrambler Webpage Integrity and are not a share of its labels.
236 of the 301 domain citations in answers naming Jscrambler Webpage Integrity came from a third party's page. Forty-three were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 367 | 19 | 2026-09-29 | Client-side protection, App shielding | |
| Glossary or explainer | 93 | 19 | 2026-09-28 | SIEM, App shielding | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 49 | 42 | 2026-09-28 | Client-side protection | |
| News or press | 22 | 3 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Case study | 17 | 12 | 2026-07-26 | ||
| Comparison | 11 | 4 | 2026-09-25 | CDN | |
| Report or ebook | 5 | 0 | 2020-05-19 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2025-12-23 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2026-04-10 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2018-09-07 |
Every page jscrambler.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.