Business continuity management
Asked as “business continuity management platform”, and as “business continuity planning software”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
14%
Contested · Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience 12%
14SafetyCulture12Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience10Continuity264others
14% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: SafetyCulture (14%) replaces LogicManager (24% then, 6% now), 8 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.SafetyCulture leads at 14%, replacing LogicManager, which led at 24% and stands at 6% now: 8 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
SafetyCulture29%Contested▼−17Since October 2026: 46% → 29%, −17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketSafetyCulture14%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: SafetyCulture (14%) replaces LogicManager (24% then, 6% now), 8 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageEnterpriseFusion Risk Management33%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 27% → 33%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
SafetyCulture29%Contested▼−17Since October 2026: 46% → 29%, −17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketSafetyCulture14%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: SafetyCulture (14%) replaces LogicManager (24% then, 6% now), 8 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageEnterpriseFusion Risk Management33%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 27% → 33%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01SafetyCulture14%0%12accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 15% → 14%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 14%
SafetyCulture14%0%12accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 15% → 14%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 14%02
Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience12%27%30criticized challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 4% → 12%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 12%
Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience12%27%30criticized challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 4% → 12%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 12%03Continuity210%3%35accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 2% → 10%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 10%
04
Mitratech Preparis10%0%17accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 5% → 10%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 10%
Mitratech Preparis10%0%17accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 5% → 10%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 10%05
LogicManager6%23%13accepted challenger▼−18Since October 2026: 24% → 6%, −18 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.24% → 6%
LogicManager6%23%13accepted challenger▼−18Since October 2026: 24% → 6%, −18 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.24% → 6%06
Preparis4%13%15accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 4%
Preparis4%13%15accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 5% → 4%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 4%07
Fortiv2%20%20accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Fortiv2%20%20accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%08Quantivate Business Continuity2%0%10accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 2%
09BC in the Cloud2%30%10criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
10Fusion Risk Management2%47%32criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15
Archer0%76%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Archer0%76%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%14
MetricStream Business Continuity Management0%50%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
MetricStream Business Continuity Management0%50%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
Everbridge 3600%44%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Everbridge 3600%44%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
ServiceNow BCM0%22%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
ServiceNow BCM0%22%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Noggin0%15%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Noggin0%15%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to head
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
SafetyCulture vs LogicManagerSafetyCulture vs PreparisSafetyCulture vs FortivSafetyCulture vs Quantivate Business ContinuityRiskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience vs Continuity2Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience vs Mitratech PreparisRiskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience vs LogicManagerRiskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience vs PreparisRiskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience vs FortivRiskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience vs Quantivate Business ContinuityContinuity2 vs Mitratech PreparisContinuity2 vs LogicManagerContinuity2 vs PreparisContinuity2 vs FortivContinuity2 vs Quantivate Business ContinuityMitratech Preparis vs LogicManagerMitratech Preparis vs PreparisMitratech Preparis vs FortivMitratech Preparis vs Quantivate Business ContinuityLogicManager vs PreparisLogicManager vs FortivLogicManager vs Quantivate Business ContinuityPreparis vs FortivPreparis vs Quantivate Business ContinuityFortiv vs Quantivate Business Continuity
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102C03
04050607Q08
B09
F10
1112131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01SafetyCulture14%
SafetyCulture14%02Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience12%
Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience12%03Continuity210%
04Mitratech Preparis10%
Mitratech Preparis10%05LogicManager6%
LogicManager6%06Preparis4%
Preparis4%07Fortiv2%
Fortiv2%08Quantivate Business Continuity2%
09BC in the Cloud2%
10Fusion Risk Management2%
11Noggin0%
Noggin0%12ServiceNow BCM0%
ServiceNow BCM0%13Everbridge 3600%
Everbridge 3600%14MetricStream Business Continuity Management0%
MetricStream Business Continuity Management0%15Archer0%
Archer0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Fusion Risk Management
47%
15 of 32 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“High criticism rate; acquired by Roper Technologies in 2023, creating uncertainty around product roadmaps” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Archer76%
13 of 17 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“The platform is notoriously rigid; modifying a simple workflow or adding a new attribute can take weeks of development time.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
MetricStream Business Continuity Management50%
9 of 18 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Also heavily criticized, with high negative ratings and poor performance in expert reviews.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience27%
8 of 30 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Avoid starting with platforms such as ServiceNow BCM, Fusion, Riskonnect, or MetricStream” Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 895 links across 180 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 45 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Fortiv44 answers · 86 citations · 12 models
38 answers · 52 citations · 10 models
33 answers · 57 citations · 10 models
29 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Mitratech25 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G222 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
22 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 21 citations · 7 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Riskonnect17 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
32 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 8 models
20 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 7 models
18 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best business continuity management platform”, “business continuity management platform”, “business continuity management platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitratech mitratech.com Mitratech Preparis 10%, Mitratech Continuity Planning 6% | 16% | 42 | 3,600 | 159 | 46,305 company | $10,768 | 106 | |
| SafetyCulture safetyculture.com | 14% | 41 | 18,100 | 132 | 466,981 | 1 | ||
| Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience riskonnect.com | 12% | 90 | 0 | 55,995 | 41 | |||
| Continuity2 continuity2.com | 10% | 87 | 20 | 0 | ||||
| Crises Control crises-control.com | 6% | 22 | 2 | |||||
| LogicManager logicmanager.com | 6% | 41 | 320 | 9 | 8,388 | |||
| Preparis preparis.com | 4% | 43 | 390 | 13 | 351 | $28 | 9 | |
| AlertMedia alertmedia.com | 4% | 39 | ||||||
| Fortiv fortiv.io | 2% | 65 | ||||||
| Quantivate Business Continuity quantivate.com | 2% | 23 | 1,533 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, getapp.com, softwareadvice.co.uk). The first result for “best business continuity management platform” is myhospitalnow.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best business continuity management platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which business continuity planning software would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top business continuity management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best business continuity management platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a business continuity management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which business continuity management platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5SprintoRiskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceChangedno first choiceBCMMetricsno first choiceagainst: Archer Business Resilience, Druva, Fusion Risk Management, VMware Site Recovery Manager
Four alternatives
Continuity2, Fusion Risk Management, LogicGate, LogicManager BCMFour alternatives
Archer Business Resiliency, LogicManager BCM, Quantivate Business Continuity, SprintoTwo alternatives
Continuity2, Quantivate Business ContinuityGPT-5.4 miniRiskonnect Business Continuity & Resilienceagainst: SprintoRiskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceHeldagainst: IBM OpenPages, LogicGateno first choiceagainst: FreshserviceSafetyCultureno first choiceagainst: Blackbaud, PagerDuty
Four alternatives
Everbridge 360 AI Prepare, LogicGate, LogicManager, TandemThree alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Copla, ParaSolutionEight alternatives
Everbridge 360 AI, Fusion Enterprise Resilience Platform, GlobalSuite, IBM OpenPages, LogicGate, Noggin, Oracle Risk Management Cloud, SAI360Three alternatives
AlertMedia, Continuity2, Crises ControlGemini 3.5 FlashRiskonnect Business Continuity & Resilienceagainst: Archer, MetricStream Business Continuity ManagementRiskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceHeldFusion Risk ManagementBCP Builder, Fortivagainst: Archer, Fusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceBC in the Cloudagainst: Archer
Five alternatives
Agility Recovery, Fusion Framework System, LogicManager, ParaSolution, RecoveryPlannerFive alternatives
Fusion Framework System, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Mitratech Continuity Planning, Preparis, VeociFive alternatives
Archer, Cutover, LogicManager, Premier Continuum, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceFour alternatives
Continuity2, Eramba, Quantivate Business Continuity, SimpleRiskFive alternatives
Castellan, Invensics / Continuity2, ResilienceONE, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCMPerplexity SonarContinuity2against: FortivQuantivate Business ContinuityChangedagainst: Fortiv, LogicManagerRiskonnect Business Continuity & Resilienceagainst: FortivSafetyCultureagainst: Fusion, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCMno first choiceagainst: Archer Business Resiliency, Drata, Everbridge 360, Fortiv, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Ncontracts, ServiceNow BCM, Vanta
Five alternatives
LogicGate Risk Cloud, Noggin, Quantivate Business Continuity, ServiceNow BCM, SprintoTwo alternatives
Continuity2, NogginEight alternatives
Archer Business Resiliency, Continuity2, Everbridge 360, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Noggin, Quantivate Business Continuity, ServiceNow BCMFour alternatives
Acronis, Continuity2, Fortiv, NAKIVO Backup & ReplicationGrok 4.20Continuity2against: Archer Business Resiliency, Fusion Risk Management, NAVEX IRM, ParaSolution, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCMLogicManagerChangedagainst: Everbridge 360, Fusion Risk Management, Resolverno first choiceSafetyCultureagainst: Fusion Framework, LogicManager, NAVEXno first choiceagainst: Archer, Datto SIRIS, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Four alternatives
Castellan, Crises Control, LogicManager, Mitratech PreparisTwo alternatives
Continuity2, Mitratech PreparisThree alternatives
IDrive Business, NAKIVO Backup & Replication, SprintoMistral SmallLogicManager, Mitratech PreparisAlertMediaChangedFusion Risk Managementagainst: LogicGate, MetricStream Business Continuity ManagementSafetyCultureno first choiceagainst: Archer Resilience Management, BC in the Cloud, Everbridge 360, Fusion Framework, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Preparis, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BC Module
Two alternatives
Continuity2, SafetyCultureFour alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Fusion Framework System, Mitratech Preparis, SafetyCultureThree alternatives
Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCM, SureCloudTwo alternatives
Continuity2, FortivDeepSeek V4 FlashContinuity2against: Fusion Risk ManagementCrises ControlChangedagainst: Nogginno first choiceagainst: Everbridge 360Crises Controlagainst: Fusion Risk Management, NAVEX IRMCastellanagainst: Archer, Fusionagainst: Archer, Everbridge 360, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Three alternatives
Mitratech Preparis, Noggin, Riskonnect BCMThree alternatives
Continuity2, Fusion Risk Management, PreparisSeven alternatives
Archer, Continuity2, Fortiv, Fusion Risk Management, Noggin, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCMThree alternatives
Continuity2, IDrive Business, NAKIVO Backup & ReplicationThree alternatives
Fortiv, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, SAI360Llama 4 MaverickLogicManagerno first choiceChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Archer, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCM
Three alternatives
ParaSolution, Preparis, SafetyCultureQwen 3.7 FlashRiskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceCrises Control, Mitratech PreparisChangedFusion Risk Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceSafetyCultureagainst: Falcon.io, LogicManagerno first choiceagainst: Archer, BC in the Cloud, Datto SIRIS, Everbridge 360, Freshservice
Four alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Continuity2, Fortiv, ServiceNow BCMOne alternative
AlertMediaThree alternatives
BCMMetrics, Crises Control, Mitratech PreparisTwo alternatives
NAKIVO Backup & Replication, RecoveryPlannerKimi K2Continuity2, Quantivate BCMagainst: Fusion Risk ManagementMitratech PreparisChangedFusion Risk ManagementBCM Starter KitContinuity2against: Archer, ServiceNow BCMagainst: Archer, BC in the Cloud, Castellan, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Noggin, Preparis, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, SAP GRC
Two alternatives
Castellan Solutions, Mitratech PreparisTwo alternatives
AlertMedia, Continuity2Nine alternatives
Archer, LogicGate, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Noggin, Quantivate Business Continuity, Resolver, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, SAI360, ServiceNow BCMFour alternatives
Continuity2, Fortiv, NAKIVO Backup & Replication, veriniceFour alternatives
BC in the Cloud, Fortiv, Mitratech Preparis, Riskonnect BCMGLM 4.7 FlashXMitratech PreparisEverbridge 360 AI PrepareChangedFortivSafetyCultureagainst: Archer, Fusion Risk Managementno first choiceagainst: Archer, Fusion Risk Management, IBM BRMS, Kaseya Unitrends, Noggin
Two alternatives
Fusion Risk Management, ServiceNow BCMOne alternative
Riskonnect Business Continuity & ResilienceNine alternatives
Archer Business Resiliency, Continuity2, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Noggin, Preparis, Quantivate Business Continuity, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCMThree alternatives
BCM Starter Kit, Continuity2, NAKIVO Backup & ReplicationMiniMax M2.5Fusion Risk Management, Mitratech Continuity PlanningAlertMediaChangedEverbridge 360against: ArcherSafetyCultureno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Continuity2 Meridian BCMSThree alternatives
Carbonite, Continuity2, Mitratech PreparisSeven alternatives
Fusion Risk Management, LogicGate, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Noggin, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, SureCloud, VeociFour alternatives
Continuity2, LogicManager, NAKIVO Backup & Replication, RecoveryPlannerGPT-6 LunaParaSolutionMitratech PreparisChangedCLDigital 360, ParaSolutionKingsBridge SHIELDno first choiceagainst: Archer Resilience Management, Everbridge 360
Two alternatives
C2 Meridian, Everbridge 360 AI PrepareTwo alternatives
Continuity2 Meridian BCMS, ServiceNow BCMFive alternatives
Archer Resilience Management, Everbridge 360 AI Prepare, Fusion Framework System, Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience, ServiceNow BCMTwo alternatives
Aptien, SmartSuiteMuse Glimmer 30BMitratech Continuity Planning, Preparisagainst: Fusion Risk ManagementMitratech Continuity Planning, PreparisHeldagainst: Fusion Risk Management, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Managementno first choiceagainst: Everbridge BC in the CloudAptienagainst: Continuity2, Meridian BCMSno first choiceagainst: Mitratech Preparis Planner / Mitratech Preparis
Two alternatives
Fortiv, NogginTwo alternatives
Continuity2, NogginSix alternatives
Archer Business Resiliency, now RSA Archer, Fusion Risk Management, MetricStream Business Continuity Management, Riskonnect Business Continuity Management, ServiceNow BCM, SureCloudOne alternative
NAKIVO Backup & ReplicationBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 6 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:33 | yes | 7 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:29 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:08 | yes | 16 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:49 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:17 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:32 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:21 | yes | 18 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:09 | yes | 24 | 202 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:36 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:00 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:09 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:14 | yes | 6 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:06 | yes | 9 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:12 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:56 | yes | 23 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:28 | yes | 13 | 37 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:36 | yes | 18 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 9 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:24 | yes | 11 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:35 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:10 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:56 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:43 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 18 | 40 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:51 | yes | 14 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 19 | 80 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:18 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:18 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 7 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:45 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:10 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:19 | yes | 13 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:58 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:51 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:40 | yes | 21 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:16 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 17 | 59 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:20 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:06 | yes | 23 | 47 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:55 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:53 | yes | 2 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:55 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:05 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:30 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:02 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:20 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:35 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:47 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 23 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:44 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 17 | 54 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 20 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:31 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:32 | yes | 4 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:11 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:00 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 8 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:43 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:15 | yes | 18 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 10 | 44 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:09 | yes | 24 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:35 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:50 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:05 | yes | 2 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:10 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Everbridge read as Everbridge 360
MetricStream read as MetricStream Business Continuity Management
MetricStream (Business Continuity Management module) read as MetricStream Business Continuity Management
NAKIVO read as NAKIVO Backup & Replication
Quantivate read as Quantivate Business Continuity
Riskonnect read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Riskonnect (Business Continuity & Resilience) read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Riskonnect (formerly Castellan / BC in the Cloud) read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Riskonnect (formerly Castellan) read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Riskonnect (includes Castellan) read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Riskonnect (incorporating Castellan & BC in the Cloud) read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
Riskonnect Business Continuity read as Riskonnect Business Continuity & Resilience
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Veeam read as Veeam Data Platform
Unresolved, counted raw
Advisori
Archer Business Resiliency, now RSA Archer
Blackbaud
CL360 Business Continuity
Castellan Software
Castellan Solutions (now part of Riskonnect)
Continuity
Cutover
FEMA
Falcon.io
Fortiv.io
IBM BRMS
IBM Business Continuity
IBM ServiceNow
Infotech
Invensics / Continuity2
Kaseya Unitrends
Mitratech Preparis Planner / Mitratech Preparis
Monday.service
OpenText CloudAlly Backup
Oracle Risk Management and Compliance
Preparis Agility RecoveryPlanner
Resilience365
ResilienceONE (by Strategic BCP)
ServiceNow BC Module
Tandem
VMware Site Recovery Manager
Workwave
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.