Client-side protection · November 2026 Edition
Feroot Security vs Reflectiz
Four of fourteen models named Feroot Security first on the direct prompt; two named Reflectiz. Feroot Security was named by ten of the fourteen models and Reflectiz by twelve and Feroot Security carries 25 labels and Reflectiz 32, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share10%10%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%31%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels2532A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Feroot Security reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.cside vs Feroot Security · cside vs Reflectiz · Cloudflare Page Shield vs Feroot Security
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the client-side protection page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Feroot SecurityFirst choices, of fourteen modelsReflectiz
Direct42
Paraphrase03
Comparative112 against Reflectiz
Budget-constrained101 against Feroot Security · 2 against Reflectiz
Scale-constrained00
Negative006 against Reflectiz
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Feroot Security and Reflectiz were named in the same answer thirty-six times, of the 59 answers naming Feroot Security and the 93 naming Reflectiz. In those answers Reflectiz took the first choice six times and Feroot Security six.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Feroot Security and Reflectiz stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Feroot Security Reflectiz first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Feroot Security on the left and Reflectiz on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Feroot Security and Reflectiz stood in it.
Both were the first choice
1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.Kimi K2Feroot Security, Reflectiz alternatives: cside
Feroot Security first, Reflectiz an alternative
3 of 14 modelsReflectiz was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mistral SmallFeroot Security, cside alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, otto-js
DeepSeek V4 FlashFeroot Security alternatives: Cloudflare Page Shield, Reflectiz, cside
Qwen 3.7 FlashFeroot Security alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Cloudflare, HUMAN Security, Source Defense
Reflectiz first, Feroot Security an alternative
1 of 14 modelsFeroot Security was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashReflectiz alternatives: Cloudflare Page Shield, Feroot Security, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Grok 4.20cside alternatives: Feroot Security, Reflectiz
GLM 4.7 FlashXcside alternatives: Feroot Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Reflectiz
Muse Glimmer 30Bcside alternatives: Reflectiz
Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 minino first choice
Perplexity SonarSource Defense alternatives: Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance, Jscrambler Webpage Integrity
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
MiniMax M2.5CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint alternatives: ESET Endpoint Security
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Defender for Cloud alternatives: Sophos Intercept X
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Feroot Security leads by six points.
Feroot Security6%#4 of 11Reflectiz0%#7 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Feroot Security10%#3 of 10Reflectiz10%#4 of 10Enterprise
Feroot Security leads by four points.
Feroot Security16%#1 of 12Reflectiz12%#4 of 12What the models said about Feroot Security
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Feroot Security (higher cost, but excellent for payment page protection)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · soft negative
“Cloudflare Client-Side Security (Page Shield) and Feroot Security are the best choices due to their free tiers and strong reputations.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for Compliance & Ease of Use: Feroot Security ... Feroot is often cited as the strongest option.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“If you want the best balance of reputation, compliance, and user satisfaction: go with Feroot Security.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Reflectiz
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Client-side monitoring, sandboxing, or behavioral detection tools (e.g., those from Reflectiz, Feroot, Human Security, Imperva Client-Side Protection, Source Defense) ... ineffective against sophisticated attacks” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“"such as JavaScript sandboxing agents (e.g., from vendors like JScrambler, SourceDefense/Reflectiz, Human Security)" ... 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Reflectiz (in some implementations) ... have been criticized because: They run inside the customer's browser, which means they can be bypassed” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Reflectiz ⭐ (Highest Rated: 4.9/5 on G2) ... Fastest deployment, zero code changes | Reflectiz” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, I recommend Feroot Security or Reflectiz” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“For a mid-sized B2B company, I'd recommend starting with Reflectiz” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
cside vs Feroot Securitycside vs ReflectizCloudflare Page Shield vs Feroot SecurityCloudflare Page Shield vs ReflectizFeroot Security vs Source DefenseFeroot Security vs Feroot PaymentGuardReflectiz vs Source DefenseReflectiz vs Feroot PaymentGuardAll fifteen head-to-head pages and the full client-side protection standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.