SaaS security posture management for enterprise buyers
Asked as “SSPM platform”, and as “SaaS security posture management tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
54%
Clear leader
54AppOmni17CrowdStrike Falcon Shield06Obsidian Security23others
54% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+14Since October 2026: 40% → 54%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.AppOmni held the lead, +14 points on 40%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Wing Security29%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Wing Security (29%) replaces Nudge Security (20% then, 20% now), 9 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketWing Security28%Contested▼−2Since October 2026: 30% → 28%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
AppOmni54%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 40% → 54%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This page
Wing Security29%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Wing Security (29%) replaces Nudge Security (20% then, 20% now), 9 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketWing Security28%Contested▼−2Since October 2026: 30% → 28%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseAppOmni54%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 40% → 54%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01AppOmni54%15%66endorsed leader▲+14Since October 2026: 40% → 54%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.40% → 54%
AppOmni54%15%66endorsed leader▲+14Since October 2026: 40% → 54%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.40% → 54%02
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield17%5%37accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 10% → 17%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 17%
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield17%5%37accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 10% → 17%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 17%03
Obsidian Security6%2%45accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 6% → 6%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 6%
Obsidian Security6%2%45accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 6% → 6%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 6%04Adaptive Shield4%11%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
05Obsidian4%10%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
06
Valence Security2%0%22accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Valence Security2%0%22accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%07
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps2%19%16accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps2%19%16accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%Show the nine products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
16Wing Security0%20%10accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Wing Security0%20%10accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%15
Nudge Security0%18%17accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Nudge Security0%18%17accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%10
Zscaler SSPM0%17%23accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Zscaler SSPM0%17%23accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%14
Netskope SSPM0%17%12accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Netskope SSPM0%17%12accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%09Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS0%14%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13
Wiz0%13%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Wiz0%13%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Grip Security0%13%23accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Grip Security0%13%23accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%12
CrowdStrike0%10%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
CrowdStrike0%10%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%11
DoControl0%8%12accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
DoControl0%8%12accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Wing Security vs Adaptive ShieldWing Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon ShieldWing Security vs Grip SecurityWing Security vs Valence SecurityNudge Security vs Obsidian SecurityNudge Security vs AppOmniNudge Security vs Adaptive ShieldNudge Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon ShieldNudge Security vs Grip SecurityNudge Security vs Valence SecurityObsidian Security vs AppOmniObsidian Security vs Adaptive ShieldObsidian Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon ShieldObsidian Security vs Grip SecurityObsidian Security vs Valence SecurityAppOmni vs Adaptive ShieldAppOmni vs CrowdStrike Falcon ShieldAppOmni vs Grip SecurityAppOmni vs Valence SecurityAdaptive Shield vs CrowdStrike Falcon ShieldAdaptive Shield vs Grip SecurityAdaptive Shield vs Valence SecurityCrowdStrike Falcon Shield vs Grip SecurityCrowdStrike Falcon Shield vs Valence SecurityGrip Security vs Valence Security
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203A04
O05
060708P09
10111213141516Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01AppOmni54%
AppOmni54%02CrowdStrike Falcon Shield17%
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield17%03Obsidian Security6%
Obsidian Security6%04Adaptive Shield4%
05Obsidian4%
06Valence Security2%
Valence Security2%07Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps2%
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps2%08Grip Security0%
Grip Security0%09Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS0%
10Zscaler SSPM0%
Zscaler SSPM0%11DoControl0%
DoControl0%12CrowdStrike0%
CrowdStrike0%13Wiz0%
Wiz0%14Netskope SSPM0%
Netskope SSPM0%15Nudge Security0%
Nudge Security0%16Wing Security0%
Wing Security0%What they warned about
Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.20, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
AppOmni15%
10 of 66 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“AppOmni has limited visibility into user activity and data flow with no context at the user level, lacks detection and response capabilities, and has no remediation for exposed data.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
SpinOne50%
3 of 6 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Grip Security/Spin.AI due to gaps in coverage of modern attack surfaces” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Zscaler SSPM17%
4 of 23 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“older iterations of Zscaler that rely heavily on browser proxying or limited APIs” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps19%
3 of 16 labels negative · 3 of 14 models
“what native tooling does not cover is the long tail: the apps bought outside IT, the free tools with corporate accounts, and the AI assistants connected by OAuth” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 911 links across 221 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 68 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
39 answers · 40 citations · 12 models
32 answers · 32 citations · 12 models
vendor site · AppOmni31 answers · 46 citations · 12 models
30 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
27 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
publisher (Gane)25 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
vendor site · GitHub22 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CrowdStrike17 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Nudge Security17 answers · 22 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Valence Security15 answers · 16 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
39 answers · 12 models
30 answers · 11 models
28 answers · 11 models
26 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best sspm platform”, “sspm platform”, “sspm platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AppOmni appomni.com | 54% | 162 | 1,300 | 15 | 47,643 | 0 | 8 | |
| CrowdStrike crowdstrike.com CrowdStrike Falcon Shield 17%, CrowdStrike 0% | 17% | 302 | 74,000 | 5,130 | 715,209 | $13,967 | 119 | 3 |
| Obsidian Security obsidiansecurity.com | 6% | 116 | 2,900 | 63 | 6,765 | $1,460 | 53 | 9 |
| Adaptive Shield | 4% | 320 | 36 | |||||
| Obsidian | 4% | 368,000 | 38,660 | |||||
| Valence Security valencesecurity.com | 2% | 61 | 320 | 1 | 773 | 0 | 5 | |
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps 2% | 2% | 39 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Push Security pushsecurity.com | 2% | 60 | 1,000 | 83 | 5,368 | $51 | 4 | |
| Reco reco.ai Reco 2%, Reco AI 0% | 2% | 27 | 9,900 | 451 | 12,799 | $1,111 | 34 | 6 |
| CloudEagle.ai cloudeagle.ai | 2% | 90 | 50 | 2 | 28,845 | $325 | 5 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (appomni.com, crowdstrike.com, gbhackers.com, valencesecurity.com, vcso.ai). The first result for “best sspm platform” is grip.security.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best SSPM platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which SaaS security posture management tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade SSPM platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SSPM platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a SSPM platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SSPM platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5AppOmniAppOmniHeldAppOmniValence Securityagainst: AppOmni, Obsidian, Zscaler SSPMno first choiceagainst: AppOmni, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
Three alternatives
CrowdStrike, DoControl, ObsidianTwo alternatives
CrowdStrike, Obsidian SecurityFive alternatives
Adaptive Shield, DoControl, Netskope SSPM, Obsidian Security, RecoTwo alternatives
Adaptive Shield, CrowdStrikeGPT-5.4 miniPush Security, RecoMicrosoft Defender for Cloud AppsChangedAppOmniAppOmnino first choicenothing named
One alternative
TorqOne alternative
Okta Identity Security Posture ManagementSeven alternatives
Adaptive Shield, FortiCASB-SSPM / Fortinet, Netskope SSPM, Obsidian Security, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS, Valence Security, Zscaler SSPMOne alternative
Push SecurityGemini 3.5 FlashAppOmniAppOmniHeldAppOmniAppOmnino first choiceagainst: Defender for Cloud Apps, Google Workspace Admin Console, Microsoft Purview, Salesforce Security Center
Four alternatives
Adaptive Shield, DoControl, Obsidian Security, Valence SecurityFour alternatives
Adaptive Shield, DoControl, Grip Security, Obsidian SecurityFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, DoControl, Grip Security, Obsidian SecurityThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Obsidian SecurityPerplexity SonarAppOmniAppOmniHeldAppOmniObsidian Securityno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Obsidian Security, Valence SecuritySix alternatives
Adaptive Shield, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Grip Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Nudge Security, Obsidian SecurityNine alternatives
Astrix Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Nudge Security, Obsidian Security, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS, Valence Security, Wing Security, Zscaler SSPMOne alternative
AppOmniGrok 4.20AppOmni, Obsidian Securityagainst: VaronisAppOmniChangedAppOmni, Valence Securityagainst: Microsoft Defender for Cloud AppsCrowdStrike Falcon Shieldagainst: AppOmni, Reco, SpinOne, Wizno first choiceagainst: AppOmni, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Obsidian Security, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS / SSPM
Two alternatives
Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS, Zscaler SSPMFive alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Nudge Security, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SSPM, Valence Security, Zscaler SSPMThree alternatives
CrowdStrike, Obsidian Security, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaSThree alternatives
Microsoft's native Secure Score, Obsidian Security, Zscaler SSPMMistral SmallAdaptive Shield, AppOmniAdaptive Shield, AppOmniHeldAppOmniagainst: Wing SecurityAppOmni, Obsidianno first choiceagainst: Adaptive Shield, AppOmni, Grip Security, SpinOne, Zluri
Two alternatives
Netskope SSPM, Valence SecurityThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Grip Security, Obsidian SecurityOne alternative
CrowdStrike Falcon ShieldDeepSeek V4 FlashAppOmniCrowdStrike Falcon ShieldChangedAppOmniagainst: Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaSCrowdStrike Falcon Shieldagainst: AppOmni, Grip Security, Nudge SecurityAppOmniagainst: Canonic, CrowdStrike Falcon, Cynet 360, DoControl, Grip Security, Nudge Security, Prisma SaaS, SpinOne, Varonis, Wing Security, Zluri
Three alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Obsidian Security, Valence SecurityTwo alternatives
AppOmni, Obsidian SecurityFive alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Grip Security, Obsidian Security, Reco AI, Wiz SSPMOne alternative
Obsidian SecurityFour alternatives
Adaptive Shield, DoControl, Nudge Security, Obsidian SecurityLlama 4 MaverickAppOmnino first choiceChangedAppOmniAppOmni, Obsidianno first choiceagainst: AppOmni
Three alternatives
CrowdStrike, Grip Security, Obsidian SecurityTwo alternatives
Adaptive Shield, Obsidian SecurityOne alternative
CrowdStrikeQwen 3.7 FlashCrowdStrike Falcon ShieldDrata, VantaChangedagainst: Microsoft Defender for Cloud AppsAppOmniagainst: Netskope SSPM, Zscaler SSPMVaronisno first choiceagainst: AWS Security Hub, CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Netskope SSPM, Nudge Security, Prisma Cloud, Zscaler SSPM
Four alternatives
AppOmni, BetterCloud, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS, Zscaler SSPMTwo alternatives
Varonis, WizFour alternatives
CrowdStrike, Grip Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Obsidian SecurityFour alternatives
Exabeam, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Microsoft Purview, Netskope SSPMKimi K2AppOmniAppOmniHeldAppOmniCrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Obsidian Securityagainst: AppOmniAppOmniagainst: CrowdStrike Falcon, Prisma Cloud, Wiz
Four alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Netskope SSPM, Obsidian Security, Zscaler SSPMOne alternative
Grip SecurityFive alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Obsidian Security, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS / SSPM, Zscaler SSPMOne alternative
Netskope SSPMSix alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Grip Security, Netskope SSPM, Obsidian Security, Palo Alto Prisma SSPM, Zscaler SSPMGLM 4.7 FlashXAppOmniAppOmniHeldAppOmniCrowdStrike Falcon Shieldagainst: AppOmni, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS, Zscaler SSPMno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Obsidian Security, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaSThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Obsidian Security, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaSFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Obsidian Security, Reco AI, WizOne alternative
WizMiniMax M2.5AppOmniagainst: Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaSAppOmniHeldno first choiceAppOmni, CrowdStrike Falcon Shieldno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Grip Security, Nudge Security, Obsidian SecurityThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, WizGPT-6 LunaCrowdStrike Falcon ShieldAppOmniChangedAppOmniCrowdStrike Falcon Shieldno first choiceagainst: Adaptive Shield, BetterCloud, Torii, Zylo
Two alternatives
AppOmni, Obsidian SecurityTwo alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Obsidian SecuritySix alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Netskope One SSPM, Obsidian Security, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS, Valence SecurityOne alternative
AppOmniMuse Glimmer 30BAppOmniAppOmniHeldAppOmni, Obsidian SecurityCloudEagle.aino first choiceagainst: AppOmni, CrowdStrike
Three alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Grip Security, Obsidian SecurityFour alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, Obsidian Security, Valence Security, Wing SecuritySeven alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, DoControl, Grip Security, Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS, Valence Security, Wing Security, Zscaler SSPMTwo alternatives
AppOmni, ObsidianBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:01 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:15 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:19 | yes | 3 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:40 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:39 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:31 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:17 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:14 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:35 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:07 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 15 | 84 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:29 | yes | 15 | 62 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:17 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:54 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:30 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:05 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:46 | yes | 14 | 43 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:24 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:53 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:24 | yes | 12 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 19 | 13 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:04 | yes | 8 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:41 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:58 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:53 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:55 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:47 | yes | 19 | 49 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:35 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:55 | yes | 23 | 42 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 25 | 78 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:56 | yes | 10 | 89 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 7 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 11 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:15 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:43 | yes | 3 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:36 | yes | 7 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:08 | yes | 12 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:44 | yes | 25 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:27 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:36 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:04 | yes | 17 | 57 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 21 | 69 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 20 | 88 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 18 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:47 | yes | 26 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:22 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:55 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:58 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:48 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:10 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 22 | 53 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:22 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:01 | yes | 14 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:19 | yes | 14 | 108 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:36 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:43 | yes | 3 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 17 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:42 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:42 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:22 | yes | 13 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:52 | yes | 22 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:55 | yes | 9 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:29 | yes | 10 | 56 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:48 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:38 | yes | 4 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:49 | yes | 22 | 35 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CrowdStrike Falcon SSPM read as CrowdStrike Falcon Shield
CrowdStrike Falcon SSPM (formerly Adaptive Shield) read as CrowdStrike Falcon Shield
CrowdStrike Falcon SSPM (or Shield) read as CrowdStrike Falcon Shield
Grip read as Grip Security
Microsoft read as Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
Microsoft (native Purview/Defender capabilities) read as Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps
Netskope read as Netskope SSPM
Nudge read as Nudge Security
Palo Alto read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS
Palo Alto Networks read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma Cloud / CASB) read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma SASE / SSPM) read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS
Palo Alto Networks (Prisma SSPM) read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS
Palo Alto Networks SSPM read as Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS
Spin.AI read as SpinOne
Spin.ai read as SpinOne
Valence read as Valence Security
Zscaler read as Zscaler SSPM
Zscaler (Advanced SSPM / Canonic) read as Zscaler SSPM
Zscaler (Advanced SSPM) read as Zscaler SSPM
Zscaler (incl. former Canonic) read as Zscaler SSPM
Zscaler Advanced SSPM read as Zscaler SSPM
Unresolved, counted raw
Falcon
FortiCASB-SSPM / Fortinet
Microsoft's native Secure Score
Moftgate SSPM
Netskope One SSPM
Palo Alto Networks Prisma SSPM
Prisma SaaS (Palo Alto)
Salesforce Security Center
Varonis Systems
Wiz SaaS Security
Zscaler via Angel
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.