Two of fourteen models named Obsidian Security first on the direct prompt; three named Adaptive Shield. Obsidian Security was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Adaptive Shield by ten and Obsidian Security carries 43 labels and Adaptive Shield 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the saas security posture management page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Obsidian Security and Adaptive Shield were named in the same answer forty times, of the 117 answers naming Obsidian Security and the 73 naming Adaptive Shield. In those answers Adaptive Shield took the first choice three times and Obsidian Security four.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | AS | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | AS | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | AS | AS | AS | |||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise-first platforms like AppOmni, Obsidian Security (paid tier), and CrowdStrike Falcon SSPM if you're a small business.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“it also has a significant negative rate (64% negative feedback) and is flagged as a criticized challenger” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“having a high negative share on labels, indicating that it may not be a reliable choice” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Adaptive Shield or Obsidian Security offer the best balance of features, usability, and value” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“or Obsidian Security if you need mature threat detection alongside posture management” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Obsidian Security — *Best Overall for Posture + Threat Detection*” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Heavyweight enterprise solutions (such as AppOmni, Adaptive Shield/CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, or Varonis) often carry high annual contract minimums” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Also labeled a "challenger" in recent indices, with some negative sentiment... can feel limited in breadth or remediation compared to leaders” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some reviews suggest caution due to potential integration or support issues following the acquisition.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best for: Organizations needing continuous monitoring and control of their entire SaaS stack... often praised for its depth and breadth of coverage.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“Adaptive Shield and AppOmni are top contenders, with Adaptive Shield being especially popular for its comprehensive features and ease of use” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Go with Wing Security or Adaptive Shield. They offer turn-key configurations, quick agentless API deployment” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.