Three of fourteen models named Adaptive Shield first on the direct prompt; one named Valence Security. Adaptive Shield was named by ten of the fourteen models and Valence Security by fourteen and Adaptive Shield carries 22 labels and Valence Security 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the saas security posture management page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Adaptive Shield and Valence Security were named in the same answer twenty-seven times, of the 73 answers naming Adaptive Shield and the 62 naming Valence Security. In those answers Valence Security took the first choice two times and Adaptive Shield three.
| Model | DirectAS | ParaphraseAS | ComparativeAS | Budget-constrainedAS | Scale-constrainedAS | NegativeAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | AS | AS | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | AS | AS | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | AS | AS | AS | AS | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | AS | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | AS | AS | AS | |||
| Mistral Small | AS | AS | AS | AS | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | AS | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | AS | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | AS | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Heavyweight enterprise solutions (such as AppOmni, Adaptive Shield/CrowdStrike Falcon Shield, or Varonis) often carry high annual contract minimums” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Also labeled a "challenger" in recent indices, with some negative sentiment... can feel limited in breadth or remediation compared to leaders” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some reviews suggest caution due to potential integration or support issues following the acquisition.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best for: Organizations needing continuous monitoring and control of their entire SaaS stack... often praised for its depth and breadth of coverage.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“Adaptive Shield and AppOmni are top contenders, with Adaptive Shield being especially popular for its comprehensive features and ease of use” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Go with Wing Security or Adaptive Shield. They offer turn-key configurations, quick agentless API deployment” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“AppOmni, Obsidian Security, Valence, Reco, DoControl, and comparable vendors should still be tested against your specific critical applications” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Approach with caution for large enterprises” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Valence Security is the best overall choice for mid-market B2B companies” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Valence brings clarity to SaaS-to-SaaS and OAuth supply chain risk, with one of the most credible AI-SPM stories.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · alternative
“If your business lives and dies by interconnected SaaS integrations, Valence Security is worth a close look.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.