3 categories · RankedObsidian Security
Obsidian Security is a security platform for SaaS applications, covering SaaS security posture management and identity threat detection and response · obsidiansecurity.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Wing Security is first at 29%.
Wing Security is first at 28%. 2 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
AppOmni is first at 54%.
Why models recommend it
“Adaptive Shield or Obsidian Security offer the best balance of features, usability, and value”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct question · first choice
“or Obsidian Security if you need mature threat detection alongside posture management”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Obsidian Security — *Best Overall for Posture + Threat Detection*”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Direct question · first choice
“Obsidian Security is the most commonly cited mid-market SSPM”Muse Glimmer 30B · Paraphrase question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Avoid enterprise-first platforms like AppOmni, Obsidian Security (paid tier), and CrowdStrike Falcon SSPM if you're a small business.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“it also has a significant negative rate (64% negative feedback) and is flagged as a criticized challenger”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“having a high negative share on labels, indicating that it may not be a reliable choice”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
“AppOmni, Obsidian Security, Valence, Reco, DoControl, and comparable vendors should still be tested against your specific critical applications”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Obsidian Security, over the 117 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 102 | 46 | Compare → | |
| 52 | 7 | Compare → | |
| 52 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 43 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 40 | 14 | Compare → | |
| 40 | 6 | Compare → | |
| 40 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 32 | 0 | View → | |
| 32 | 0 | View → | |
| 21 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Obsidian Security →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Obsidian Security's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- security leaders
- Price stated
- Free $0/m; Foundations: Get a Quote; Advanced: Get a Quote
- Starting price
- $0
- Free plan or trial
- Free Trial
- Integrations
- 200
- Certifications
- IRAP, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, SOC 2, ISO 42001
- Customers named
- Snowflake, Databricks, Pure Storage, BigCommerce, Norma Cyber, T-Mobile, Algolia, Seagate
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 116 of the 117 answers that named Obsidian Security and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
347 of the 381 domain citations in answers naming Obsidian Security came from a third party's page. Thirty-four were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 264 | 76 | 2026-10-01 | SSPM, MFA | |
| Glossary or explainer | 124 | 46 | 2026-09-24 | SSPM, IGA | |
| News or press | 54 | 1 | 2026-08-04 | SIEM, SSPM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 32 | undated | SSPM | ||
| Comparison | 31 | 12 | 2026-09-24 | EDR, Email security | |
| Case study | 11 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 5 | 1 | 2026-07-30 | SSPM | |
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated | SSPM |
Most recent
- 2026-10-01How workday thinks about ai agent governance blog
- 2026-10-01Scattered spider saas attack analysis blog
- 2026-09-24Access token vs refresh token key differences explained comparison
- 2026-09-24Ai safety benchmarks blog
- 2026-09-24OAuth Scopes: Permissions & Security Best Practices blog
- 2026-09-24Prompt Injection Attacks: The Most Common AI Exploit in 2025 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page obsidiansecurity.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.