3 categories · RankedGrip Security
Grip Security is a SaaS security product that discovers shadow IT and unsanctioned SaaS apps and addresses SaaS identity risk, including malicious OAuth grants, risky browser extensions and non-human identities · grip.security ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Wing Security is first at 29%.
Wing Security is first at 28%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
AppOmni is first at 54%.
Why models recommend it
“Choose Wing Security or Grip Security if you want lower-friction pricing, strong shadow-SaaS/AI-app discovery and self-service onboarding”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · first choice
“Excels in identity-first security and comprehensive visibility. Strongest in discovering shadow SaaS”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · first choice
“SaaS Alerts or Grip Security are good starting points”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Choose Grip or Nudge Security if shadow IT, unapproved AI apps, and ungoverned user access across the web are your primary operational headache.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Nudge Security, Wing Security, and Grip Security can be appropriate when shadow IT and identity-adjacent discovery are the primary problem”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“flagged for missing critical OAuth/AI integration attack surfaces”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Grip Security, over the 90 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 66 | 23 | Compare → | |
| 53 | 11 | Compare → | |
| 52 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 39 | 13 | Compare → | |
| 38 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 32 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 25 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 23 | 0 | View → | |
| 21 | 3 | View → | |
| 18 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Grip Security →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Grip Security's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- organizations
- Price stated
- Pricing
- Starting price
- from $8/user/month under 1,000 employees
- Free plan or trial
- 30 Days No-Cost Trial
- Integrations
- 70
- Certifications
- ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II
- Hosting
- North America, Israel
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 89 of the 90 answers that named Grip Security and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
309 of the 345 domain citations in answers naming Grip Security came from a third party's page. Thirty-six were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 277 | 79 | 2026-10-01 | SSPM, ITDR | |
| Glossary or explainer | 71 | 3 | 2026-10-01 | SSPM, ASM | |
| Comparison | 21 | 8 | 2026-10-01 | SSPM, ITDR | |
| Case study | 20 | undated | Email security, TPRM | ||
| News or press | 19 | undated | ITDR, SSPM | ||
| Report or ebook | 12 | undated | ITDR, SSPM | ||
| Template or tool | 7 | 2 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-10-01Ai risk in saas environments blog
- 2026-10-01Casb vs sspm itdr comparison
- 2026-10-01Oauth token risk saas blind spot blog
- 2026-10-01Rule of 17 ai agent security blog
- 2026-10-01What is sspm glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-29Claude compliance api ai governance blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page grip.security exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.