Cyber risk quantification for enterprise buyers
Asked as “cyber risk quantification tool”, and as “CRQ platform”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
48%
Clear leader
48SAFE Security14SAFE One12RiskLens26others
48% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▼−8Since October 2026: 56% → 48%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.SAFE Security held the lead, −8 points on 56%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small businessFairCRQ35%Contested▲+26Since October 2026: 9% → 35%, +26 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-market
CyberSaint CyberStrong13%Contested▼−12Since October 2026: 25% → 13%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Enterprise
SAFE Security48%Clear leader▼−8Since October 2026: 56% → 48%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
CyberSaint CyberStrong13%Contested▼−12Since October 2026: 25% → 13%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterpriseSAFE Security48%Clear leader▼−8Since October 2026: 56% → 48%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01SAFE Security48%0%44endorsed leader▼−8Since October 2026: 56% → 48%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.56% → 48%
SAFE Security48%0%44endorsed leader▼−8Since October 2026: 56% → 48%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.56% → 48%02
SAFE One14%0%12accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 7% → 14%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 14%
SAFE One14%0%12accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 7% → 14%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 14%03RiskLens12%3%29accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 9% → 12%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 12%
04
Kovrr6%0%37accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%
Kovrr6%0%37accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%05CyberSaint CyberStrong2%24%29accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
CyberSaint CyberStrong2%24%29accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%06
Bitsight Financial Quantification2%13%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Bitsight Financial Quantification2%13%15accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%07Axio3602%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Archer0%64%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Archer0%64%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
OneTrust0%50%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
OneTrust0%50%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
MetricStream0%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
MetricStream0%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Axio0%0%32accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 0%
Axio0%0%32accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 0%09
Balbix0%0%15accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Balbix0%0%15accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%10ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier0%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to head
CyberSaint CyberStrong vs KovrrCyberSaint CyberStrong vs Axio360CyberSaint CyberStrong vs SAFE Security
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
CyberSaint CyberStrong vs ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierCyberSaint CyberStrong vs AxioCyberSaint CyberStrong vs RiskLensKovrr vs Axio360Kovrr vs SAFE SecurityKovrr vs ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierKovrr vs AxioKovrr vs RiskLensAxio360 vs SAFE SecurityAxio360 vs ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierAxio360 vs AxioAxio360 vs RiskLensSAFE Security vs ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierSAFE Security vs AxioSAFE Security vs RiskLensThreatConnect Risk Quantifier vs AxioThreatConnect Risk Quantifier vs RiskLensAxio vs RiskLens
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102R03
040506A07
0809T10
111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01SAFE Security48%
SAFE Security48%02SAFE One14%
SAFE One14%03RiskLens12%
04Kovrr6%
Kovrr6%05CyberSaint CyberStrong2%
CyberSaint CyberStrong2%06Bitsight Financial Quantification2%
Bitsight Financial Quantification2%07Axio3602%
08Axio0%
Axio0%09Balbix0%
Balbix0%10ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier0%
11MetricStream0%
MetricStream0%12OneTrust0%
OneTrust0%13Archer0%
Archer0%What they warned about
Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Archer64%
7 of 11 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“basic OneTrust, ServiceNow, or Archer modules that bolt on CRQ features... Avoid for primary enterprise use” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
CyberSaint CyberStrong24%
7 of 29 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Mid-Market or Legacy GRC Platforms with "CRQ Add-Ons" (Avoid for primary enterprise use; evaluate for integration only) - Examples often cited: CyberSaint” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
OneTrust50%
6 of 12 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“OneTrust has been criticized for its CRQ capabilities being in their infancy and relying on outdated qualitative methods” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
ServiceNow83%
5 of 6 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“GRC Platforms Masquerading as CRQ Tools (e.g., ServiceNow, Archer, OneTrust) ... Why to avoid: These tools tend to rely on "qualitative veneers"” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 988 links across 224 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 84 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
37 answers · 61 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G237 answers · 49 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Kovrr31 answers · 44 citations · 13 models
publisher (Gane)30 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CyberSaint24 answers · 38 citations · 13 models
vendor site · SAFE23 answers · 59 citations · 10 models
vendor site · MetricStream22 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · GitHub19 answers · 22 citations · 7 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · RiskRecon15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
vendor site · FAIR Institute14 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
34 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 8 models
19 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 6 models
15 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best cyber risk quantification tool”, “cyber risk quantification tool”, “cyber risk quantification tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAFE One safe.security SAFE Security 48%, SAFE One 14% | 62% | 112 | 2,400 | 5,496 | 1,015,372 | 12 | 8 | |
| RiskLens risklens.com | 12% | 78 | 90 | 0 | ||||
| Kovrr kovrr.com | 6% | 107 | 140 | 3 | 30,981 | 3 | 4 | |
| CoreCyber corecyber.io | 4% | 25 | ||||||
| CyberSaint CyberStrong cybersaint.io | 2% | 68 | 0 | 21,504 | 1 | 9 | ||
| Bitsight bitsight.com Bitsight Financial Quantification 2% | 2% | 28 | 4,400 | 146 | 126,245 company | $60 | 31 | |
| Axio360 | 2% | 50 | 0 | |||||
| Deep-Insight deep-insight.com | 2% | 7 | ||||||
| Cyberator GRC cyberator.net | 2% | 1 | ||||||
| Derive | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 26 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cybersaint.io, kovrr.com, metricstream.com, safe.security). The first result for “best cyber risk quantification tool” is cybersierra.co.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best cyber risk quantification tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which CRQ platform would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade cyber risk quantification tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best cyber risk quantification tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a cyber risk quantification tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which cyber risk quantification tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Kovrrno first choiceChangedSAFE SecuritySAFE Securityno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Axio, CyberSaint CyberStrong, Cymulate, SAFE SecurityFour alternatives
Axio, Balbix, CyberSaint CyberStrong, KovrrThree alternatives
Bitsight Financial Quantification, Black Kite, KovrrGPT-5.4 miniSAFE SecurityServiceNowChangedRiskLensRiskLensno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
RiskLens, ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierTwo alternatives
Mastercard Cyber Quant, SecurityScorecardTwo alternatives
CyberSaint CyberStrong, SAFE SecurityGemini 3.5 FlashSAFE OneSAFE SecurityChangedSAFE Securityagainst: Archer, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementAxio360, SAFE SecuritySAFE Securityagainst: Bitsight Financial Quantification, Panorays, SecurityScorecard
Four alternatives
Axio360, CyberSaint CyberStrong, Kovrr, ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierThree alternatives
Axio, Balbix, ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierFour alternatives
Axio, CyberSaint CyberStrong, Kovrr, ThreatConnectThree alternatives
Kovrr, MetricStream, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementFour alternatives
Axio, Balbix, CyberSaint CyberStrong, KovrrPerplexity SonarSAFE SecuritySAFE SecurityHeldSAFE SecurityCoreCyberagainst: MetricStreamno first choicenothing named
Seven alternatives
Axio, Black Kite, CyberSaint CyberStrong, Kovrr, MetricStream, SecurityScorecard, UpGuardTwo alternatives
Axio, RiskLens-style FAIR workflowsSix alternatives
Axio, Balbix, Black Kite, CyberSaint CyberStrong, Kovrr, MetricStreamOne alternative
SAFE OneGrok 4.20RiskLens, SAFE SecurityRiskLensChangedRiskLensagainst: Bitsight Financial Quantification, SecurityScorecardSAFE Securityagainst: ThreatConnectBitsight Financial Quantification, Kovrr, RiskLensagainst: Archer, CyberSaint CyberStrong, OneTrust, ServiceNow
One alternative
AxioThree alternatives
Bitsight Financial Quantification, Qualys TruRisk, X-AnalyticsFive alternatives
Axio, CyberSaint CyberStrong, Kovrr, Qualys TruRisk, ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierThree alternatives
Axio360, Kovrr, MetricStreamThree alternatives
Black Kite, CyberSaint CyberStrong, SAFE SecurityMistral SmallSAFE SecuritySAFE SecurityHeldSAFE OneKovrr, SAFE OneRiskLensagainst: Archer, CyberSaint CyberStrong, OneTrust, ServiceNow
Four alternatives
Axio, Citalid, RiskLens, X-AnalyticsOne alternative
Deep-InsightFive alternatives
Axio360, CyberSaint CyberStrong, Kovrr, Squalify, ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierFive alternatives
Aquantive, Cisco Vulnerability Management, MetricStream, SAFE Security, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementDeepSeek V4 FlashSAFE SecuritySAFE OneChangedRiskLens, SAFE SecuritySAFE Security's SAFE Oneno first choiceagainst: Archer, CyberSaint CyberStrong, OneTrust, RiskLens, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Four alternatives
Axio, Bitsight Financial Quantification, CyberSaint CyberStrong, RiskLensTwo alternatives
CyberSaint CyberStrong, KovrrFour alternatives
Axio, CyberSaint CyberStrong, Kovrr, QualysTwo alternatives
Kovrr, RiskLensLlama 4 MaverickSAFE SecurityDeep-InsightChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Axio, RiskLens, ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierQwen 3.7 FlashSAFE SecuritySAFE SecurityHeldModelRisk, RiskLensSAFE Oneno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
CyberSaint CyberStrong, Kovrr, ThreatConnect, X-AnalyticsOne alternative
KovrrThree alternatives
Archer, K-Risk, ServiceNow Integrated Risk ManagementTwo alternatives
Bitsight Financial Quantification, KovrrKimi K2SAFE SecuritySAFE SecurityHeldSAFE SecuritySAFE Securityagainst: Axio360SAFE Oneagainst: MetricStreamnothing named
Three alternatives
Axio, RiskLens, ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierTwo alternatives
Axio, KovrrFour alternatives
Axio, Balbix, KPMG, ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierOne alternative
BalbixFour alternatives
Axio360, Kovrr, Mastercard Cyber Quant, SqualifyGLM 4.7 FlashXRiskLensno first choiceChangedSAFE SecuritySAFE Securityno first choiceagainst: Archer, CyberSaint CyberStrong, OneTrust, Open FAIR, ServiceNow
Two alternatives
Citalid, ThreatConnectFour alternatives
Axio360, Balbix, CyberCube, KovrrThree alternatives
Archer, CyberSaint CyberStrong, KovrrMiniMax M2.5CyberSaint CyberStrong, SAFE SecuritySAFE SecurityChangedSAFE SecurityCoreCyber, Cyberator GRCno first choiceagainst: Archer, CyberSaint CyberStrong, OneTrust, ServiceNow
Two alternatives
Bitsight Financial Quantification, Black KiteFour alternatives
Axio, Balbix, Deep-Insight, KovrrFour alternatives
Axio, Balbix, Qualys TruRisk, ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierOne alternative
KovrrGPT-6 LunaSAFE OneSAFE OneHeldno first choiceDeriveno first choicenothing named
One alternative
AxioOne alternative
Axio360One alternative
SAFE OneMuse Glimmer 30BSAFE SecuritySAFE SecurityHeldSAFE One, SAFE SecuritySAFE Securityagainst: CyberSaint CyberStrongno first choiceagainst: Archer, CyberSaint CyberStrong, OneTrust, Open FAIR, ServiceNow
Two alternatives
Axio, KPMG CRIOne alternative
Deep-InsightFive alternatives
Axio, Axio360, Bitsight Financial Quantification, Kovrr, RiskLensOne alternative
CoreCyberBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:55 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:29 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:27 | yes | 14 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:18 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:17 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:29 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:09 | yes | 21 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:30 | yes | 14 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:43 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:19 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:38 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:16 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 6 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:07 | yes | 18 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:57 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:11 | yes | 25 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:13 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:36 | yes | 9 | 85 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 23 | 246 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:19 | yes | 15 | 56 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:54 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:19 | yes | 16 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 6 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:29 | yes | 7 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:01 | yes | 12 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 23 | 46 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 19:01 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 14 | 60 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:55 | yes | 22 | 20 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:41 | yes | 13 | 52 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:03 | yes | 7 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:47 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:54 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:43 | yes | 11 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:59 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:12 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:51 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:49 | yes | 23 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:09 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:37 | yes | 10 | 79 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:48 | yes | 22 | 54 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 23 | 63 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:20 | yes | 23 | 62 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:15 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:01 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:07 | yes | 19 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:09 | yes | 9 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:35 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:46 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:18 | yes | 24 | 53 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:17 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:34 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:40 | yes | 25 | 72 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 13 | 48 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:20 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 19:19 | yes | 3 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:58 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:17 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:55 | yes | 15 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:14 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:44 | yes | 22 | 61 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:58 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:58 | yes | 22 | 72 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 23 | 69 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:01 | yes | 25 | 61 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:08 | yes | 10 | 46 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:09 | yes | 4 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:04 | yes | 21 | 33 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
BitSight read as Bitsight Financial Quantification
Bitsight read as Bitsight Financial Quantification
CyberSaint read as CyberSaint CyberStrong
CyberSaint (CyberStrong Platform) read as CyberSaint CyberStrong
CyberSaint (CyberStrong platform) read as CyberSaint CyberStrong
CyberSaint (CyberStrong) read as CyberSaint CyberStrong
SAFE (Safe Security) read as SAFE One
Unresolved, counted raw
Aquantive
Archer Insight
Cyberator GRC
K-Risk
ModelRisk (by CMALL)
Observeri
Open-source FAIR tools
Palo Alto Xpanse
Qualys TruRisk
RiskLens-style FAIR workflows
SAFE Security's SAFE One
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.