RiskLens
RiskLens is a cyber risk quantification platform built around the FAIR model · risklens.com ↗
Strongest at enterprise. Ranked 20 of 117 for mid-market buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
FairCRQ is first at 35%.
CyberSaint CyberStrong is first at 13%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
SAFE Security is first at 48%.
Why models recommend it
“RiskLens (The Industry Standard) ... the most widely adopted commercial tool for FAIR-based analysis”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“RiskLens Pro managed service — best if you want faster results with minimal internal effort.”GPT-5.4 mini · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Choose RiskLens if you want the gold-standard, FAIR-compliant quantitative framework.”Kimi K2 · Comparative question · first choice
“Strong for FAIR rigor + automation; good for scenario-based analysis.”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Avoid overly complex/expensive tools (e.g., full Balbix or pure RiskLens post-acquisition)”Grok 4.20 · Direct question · warning
“Avoid starting with enterprise products such as MetricStream, Archer, or RiskLens”Perplexity Sonar · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Enterprise SaaS tools like the broader RiskLens platform or other commercial CRQ tools can work well, but they're typically more than a small-budget company needs at the start.”GPT-5.4 mini · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Expensive, fully licensed FAIR platforms (like early versions of RiskLens or SAFE Security) for organizations that don’t have dedicated risk analysts.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as RiskLens, over the 87 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63 | 18 | Compare → | |
| 48 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 38 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 31 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 19 | 0 | View → | |
| 18 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 18 | 0 | View → | |
| 18 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 14 | 6 | View → | |
| 12 | 2 | View → |
What the models named instead of RiskLens →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 78 of the 87 answers that named RiskLens and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
233 of the 277 domain citations in answers naming RiskLens came from a third party's page. Forty-four were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |