Cyber risk quantification · RankedKovrr
Kovrr is a cyber risk quantification platform · kovrr.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
FairCRQ is first at 35%.
CyberSaint CyberStrong is first at 13%. 3 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
SAFE Security is first at 48%.
Why models recommend it
“I'd suggest starting with ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier or Kovrr as they offer the best balance of capability, usability, and value”MiniMax M2.5 · Direct question · first choice
“Kovrr and Safe Security are the strongest choices due to their robust quantification methodologies”Mistral Small · Direct question · first choice
“Kovrr – *Best Overall for Fast Time-to-Value & Automation*”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Paraphrase question · first choice
“1. Kovrr — *Best Overall for Mid-Market*”Kimi K2 · Paraphrase question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Platforms like Kovrr and Axio have faced criticism in niche reviews for being overly focused on insurance market dynamics rather than pure operational risk quantification”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Traditional, enterprise-grade CRQ platforms (e.g., Safe Security (SAFE One), Kovrr, Axio) - generally not recommended for B2B SMBs.”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
“enterprise Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) platforms (such as Kovrr, Safe Security, or ThreatConnect) are often cost-prohibitive”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“criticized as overkill for general enterprise or SMB risk management”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Kovrr, over the 108 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 74 | 23 | Compare → | |
| 48 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 41 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 39 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 31 | 6 | Compare → | |
| 28 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 25 | 0 | View → | |
| 23 | 9 | View → | |
| 18 | 0 | View → | |
| 15 | 2 | View → |
What the models named instead of Kovrr →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Kovrr's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- security, risk, and compliance teams
- Price stated
- Contact Kovrr's team today to learn more about our flexible pricing options
- Free plan or trial
- Yes. If you navigate back to the Kovrr homepage and click 'See Us in Action,' you'll be taken to the Kovrr demonstration platform.
- Customers named
- GG Group, Abercrombie & Fitch, Bystronic, Moodle
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 107 of the 108 answers that named Kovrr and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
267 of the 369 domain citations in answers naming Kovrr came from a third party's page. Forty-seven were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 404 | 83 | 2026-10-05 | Cyber risk quant, GRC | |
| Glossary or explainer | 165 | 4 | 2026-08-04 | Cyber risk quant, TPRM | |
| Report or ebook | 29 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 18 | undated | Cyber risk quant | ||
| Case study | 12 | 3 | 2026-08-03 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 4 | 2026-08-11 | Cyber risk quant | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 3 | 2026-09-02 | Cyber risk quant | |
| Conference or event | 3 | 2 | 2026-08-03 |
Most recent
- 2026-10-05When the adversary is running the ai agents blog
- 2026-10-04Assembling quantified cyber risk metrics into a report that lands blog
- 2026-10-04When two cyber risk models disagree on the same company blog
- 2026-10-04The ai agent that was never registered anywhere blog
- 2026-10-04The ai incident reporting duty nobody can date blog
- 2026-10-03Cyber loss in rail and signalling blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page kovrr.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.