ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
FairCRQ is first at 35%.
CyberSaint CyberStrong is first at 13%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
SAFE Security is first at 48%.
Why models recommend it
“I'd suggest starting with ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier or Kovrr as they offer the best balance of capability, usability, and value”MiniMax M2.5 · Direct question · first choice
“Need a formal, repeatable FAIR program? Start with SAFE One and ThreatConnect RQ.”GPT-6 Luna · Comparative question · first choice
“ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier, which maps threats and vulnerabilities to financial-loss scenarios.”Perplexity Sonar · Direct question · alternative
“ThreatConnect's Risk Quantifier (RQ) integrates threat intelligence with cyber risk quantification”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“often start at thousands to tens of thousands per year (plus potential consulting), making them unsuitable for tight budgets”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier, over the 49 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31 | 13 | Compare → | |
| 28 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 23 | 0 | View → | |
| 18 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 18 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 18 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 17 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 11 | 0 | View → | |
| 8 | 7 | View → | |
| 8 | 5 | View → |
What the models named instead of ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 49 of the 49 answers that named ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
168 of the 182 domain citations in answers naming ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier came from a third party's page. Fourteen were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 463 | 0 | 2025-09-02 | TPRM, APM | |
| News or press | 153 | 0 | 2024-03-05 | ||
| Conference or event | 73 | 7 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Case study | 66 | 0 | 2024-03-12 | ||
| Podcast or video | 59 | 0 | 2024-08-06 | ||
| Report or ebook | 58 | 0 | 2025-03-31 | TPRM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 49 | 0 | 2025-09-04 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 30 | 0 | 2026-04-29 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 1 | 2026-08-26 | ||
| Comparison | 4 | 0 | 2025-09-23 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23It sa expo and congress conference or event
- 2026-09-17Dataminr at iacp conference or event
- 2026-09-14Cybercon 2026 conference or event
- 2026-09-03Sector 2026 conference or event
- 2026-08-31Ctem threat led vs asset led conference or event
- 2026-08-26Dataminr 2026 u s midterm election security checklist template or tool
Events in person
- October 6, 2026 to October 8, 2026SecTor 2026Metro Toronto Convention Centre, Toronto · exhibits
- October 7, 2026 to October 8, 2026Meet Dataminr at Booth 525Metro Toronto Convention Centre, Toronto · exhibits
- October 7, 2026Customer & Prospect DinnerHarbour Sixty · hosts
- August 27, 2026UNGA 2026 Coordination EventOne World Trade Center, New York, US · hosted
- May 21, 2026SecureWorld South Florida 2026Margaritaville Hollywood Beach Resort, Hollywood · hosted
As the event pages on threatconnect.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page threatconnect.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.