FairCRQ
Strongest at small business, contested with CoreCyber. Not named at enterprise.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Ranked first, contested: CoreCyber has 15%.
CyberSaint CyberStrong is first at 13%.
No model named it for this buyer.
Why models recommend it
“The best cyber risk quantification tool for a company with a limited budget is FairCRQ, a free, browser-based tool”Llama 4 Maverick · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“the best starting point is FairCRQ if you mainly need basic, board-ready financial estimates”Perplexity Sonar · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“FairCRQ is the best starting point — it's free, uses the industry-standard FAIR framework”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Non-technical / fastest to value: FairCRQ free plan for quick board-ready loss estimates”Muse Glimmer 30B · Budget-constrained question · first choice
What gives them pause
No model argued against it.
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as FairCRQ, over the 32 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 0 | View → | |
| 13 | 0 | View → | |
| 12 | 1 | View → | |
| 12 | 0 | View → | |
| 10 | 2 | View → | |
| 9 | 0 | View → | |
| 9 | 0 | View → | |
| 8 | 0 | View → | |
| 5 | 0 | View → | |
| 5 | 0 | View → |
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 32 of the 32 answers that named FairCRQ and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
140 of the 164 domain citations in answers naming FairCRQ came from a third party's page. Twenty-four were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |