Cyber risk quantification for small business buyers
Asked as “cyber risk quantification tool”, and as “CRQ platform”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 40 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
35%
Contested · CoreCyber 15%
35FairCRQ15CoreCyber05Axio36045others
35% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+26Since October 2026: 9% → 35%, +26 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.FairCRQ held the lead, +26 points on 9%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small businessFairCRQ35%Contested▲+26Since October 2026: 9% → 35%, +26 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageMid-market
CyberSaint CyberStrong13%Contested▼−12Since October 2026: 25% → 13%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Enterprise
SAFE Security48%Clear leader▼−8Since October 2026: 56% → 48%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
CyberSaint CyberStrong13%Contested▼−12Since October 2026: 25% → 13%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterpriseSAFE Security48%Clear leader▼−8Since October 2026: 56% → 48%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01FairCRQ35%0%24endorsed leader▲+26Since October 2026: 9% → 35%, +26 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.9% → 35%
03Axio3605%37%19criticized challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 5%
04
UpGuard2%5%20accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%
UpGuard2%5%20accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%05
SAFE One2%58%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
SAFE One2%58%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%06
Kovrr2%53%34criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Kovrr2%53%34criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%07RiskLens2%72%29criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
Axio0%82%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Axio0%82%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11SAFE Security0%66%35criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
SAFE Security0%66%35criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%08CyberSaint CyberStrong0%22%18accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
CyberSaint CyberStrong0%22%18accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%09ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier0%18%11accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to head
CyberSaint CyberStrong vs KovrrCyberSaint CyberStrong vs Axio360CyberSaint CyberStrong vs SAFE Security
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
CyberSaint CyberStrong vs ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierCyberSaint CyberStrong vs AxioCyberSaint CyberStrong vs RiskLensKovrr vs Axio360Kovrr vs SAFE SecurityKovrr vs ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierKovrr vs AxioKovrr vs RiskLensAxio360 vs SAFE SecurityAxio360 vs ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierAxio360 vs AxioAxio360 vs RiskLensSAFE Security vs ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierSAFE Security vs AxioSAFE Security vs RiskLensThreatConnect Risk Quantifier vs AxioThreatConnect Risk Quantifier vs RiskLensAxio vs RiskLens
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
F01
C02
A03
040506R07
08T09
1011Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01FairCRQ35%
02CoreCyber15%
03Axio3605%
04UpGuard2%
UpGuard2%05SAFE One2%
SAFE One2%06Kovrr2%
Kovrr2%07RiskLens2%
08CyberSaint CyberStrong0%
CyberSaint CyberStrong0%09ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier0%
10Axio0%
Axio0%11SAFE Security0%
SAFE Security0%What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SAFE Security66%
23 of 35 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 13 hard negative
“Traditional, enterprise-grade CRQ platforms—such as Safe Security (SAFE One), Kovirr, and Axio—are generally not recommended for B2B SMBs.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
RiskLens
72%
21 of 29 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 11 hard negative
“What to Avoid: Enterprise FAIR platforms [full RiskLens/Safe implementations] typically require $50K–$250K+ and dedicated analyst headcount—overkill” Muse Glimmer 30B, scale prompt
Kovrr53%
18 of 34 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Cyber Insurance Risk Platforms (e.g., Citalid, Kovrr for insurance-aligned use): ... often tailored to insurers' needs rather than the operational realities of smaller organizations” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Citalid100%
8 of 8 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Cyber Insurance Risk Platforms (e.g., Citalid, Kovrr for insurance-aligned use): ... can be complex or expensive for small businesses” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 867 links across 218 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 84 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
publisher (Gane)37 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G231 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
vendor site · GitHub29 answers · 53 citations · 7 models
26 answers · 37 citations · 9 models
vendor site · CoreCyber25 answers · 26 citations · 8 models
25 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · vCISO Lite22 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · FAIR Institute19 answers · 35 citations · 9 models
vendor site · ComplyJet18 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Kovrr17 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
36 answers · 10 models
28 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 8 models
24 answers · 7 models
23 answers · 7 models
21 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best cyber risk quantification tool”, “cyber risk quantification tool”, “cyber risk quantification tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FairCRQ faircrq.com | 35% | 32 | 0 | |||
| CoreCyber corecyber.io | 15% | 25 | ||||
| vCISO Lite vcisolite.com | 5% | 13 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| FAIR-U | 5% | |||||
| Axio360 | 5% | 50 | 0 | |||
| ComplyJet complyjet.com | 5% | 26 | 90 | 0 | 2,025 | |
| UpGuard upguard.com | 2% | 186 | 2,900 | 80 | 319,457 | 25 |
| cyber-risk-quant cyberdb.co | 2% | 5 | ||||
| CyberStrong | 2% | |||||
| CISA CSET cisa.gov | 2% | 5 | 1,801,370 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 26 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (kovrr.com). The first result for “best cyber risk quantification tool” is cybersierra.co.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best cyber risk quantification tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which CRQ platform would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top cyber risk quantification tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best cyber risk quantification tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a cyber risk quantification tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which cyber risk quantification tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceagainst: Archerno first choiceHeldno first choiceagainst: ArcherCISA CSET, NIST CSFno first choiceagainst: FAIR model, NIST 800-30
Four alternatives
AuditBoard, LogicGate, Microsoft Defender Risk Score, Tenable NessusSix alternatives
Axio, FAIR-U, FortifyData, Kovrr, OpenFAIR, SAFE SecurityThree alternatives
Centraleyes, ComplyJet, SprintoGPT-5.4 miniSAFE OneQuoteWerksChangedRiskLensFAIR-Uagainst: SAFE Security, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifierno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Black Kite, Mastercard Cyber Quant, SecurityScorecardThree alternatives
DealHub, HubSpot-style revenue tools, Salesforce CPQOne alternative
SAFE SecurityGemini 3.5 FlashAxio360Axio360Heldagainst: Kovrr, SAFE SecurityAxio360, FAIR-UFAIR-Uagainst: Axio360, Kovrr, RiskLens, SAFE Securityno first choiceagainst: Archer, CyberCube, Kovrr Carrier/Underwriting editions, MetricStream, RiskLens, SAFE Security, ServiceNow Risk Management
Six alternatives
Centraleyes, CyberSaint CyberStrong, Kovrr, OpenFAIR, SAFE Security, pyfairFour alternatives
Drata, FAIR-U, UpGuard, VantaFour alternatives
Black Kite, CyberStrong, Kovrr, SqualifyThree alternatives
CISA CSET, Monte Carlo Excel / Google Sheets Templates, pyfairThree alternatives
Axio360, Kovrr, SAFE SecurityPerplexity SonarComplyJetagainst: CyberSaint CyberStrong, RiskLensvCISO LiteChangedagainst: SAFE SecurityCURA, CyberStrong, LogicGate Risk Cloud, Squalifyagainst: Kovrr, SAFE OneComplyJetagainst: Axio, Kovrr, SAFE Oneno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Sprinto, UpGuard, VantaOne alternative
Black KiteTwo alternatives
Black Kite, UpGuardOne alternative
LogicGate Risk CloudGrok 4.20FairCRQagainst: Axio360, Balbix, Kovrr, RiskLens, SAFE SecurityFairCRQHeldagainst: Kovrr, RiskLens, SAFE SecurityCoreCyberagainst: Balbix, LogicGateFairCRQagainst: Axio360, Balbix, SAFE Security, WTW Cyber Quantifiedno first choiceagainst: Axio, Citalid, ISO 27005, Kovrr, NIST SP 800-30, RiskLens, SAFE One, SAFE Security
Three alternatives
CoreCyber, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier, UpGuardFour alternatives
Bitsight Financial Quantification, CyberSaint CyberStrong, UpGuard, vCISO LiteFive alternatives
Axio360, CyberSaint CyberStrong, FortifyData, SAFE Security, ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierFive alternatives
Ashish-1357/Cyber-risk-quantification, CoreCyber Starter Plan, Fair TPRM, NIST SP 800-30, cyber-risk-quantMistral SmallFairCRQno first choiceChangedFairCRQFairCRQagainst: LogicGate Risk Cloud Quantify, vCISO Liteno first choiceagainst: AIR, RiskLensagainst: Citalid, Full RiskLens, Kovrr, Safe Security Implementations
Two alternatives
CyberSaint CyberStrong, Risk Cloud QuantifyFour alternatives
CyberSaint CyberStrong, Risk Cloud Quantify, UpGuard, vCISO LiteTwo alternatives
Allianz Cyber Risk Assessment, UpGuardDeepSeek V4 FlashFairCRQagainst: RiskLens, SAFE Security, ThreatConnect Risk QuantifiervCISO LiteChangedagainst: Axio, Kovrr, RiskLens, SAFE OneFairCRQagainst: Kovrr, SAFE SecurityCoreCyberagainst: Balbix, RiskLens, SAFE SecurityCoreCyberagainst: Axio360, CyberSaint CyberStrong, Kovrr, MetricStream, RiskLens, SAFE Oneagainst: AttackIQ, Axio, Citalid, Cymulate, Kovrr, RiskLens, SAFE Security, SafeBreach
Two alternatives
CyberSaint CyberStrong, UpGuardTwo alternatives
CyberSaint CyberStrong, MaxxsureThree alternatives
Axio360, CyberSaint CyberStrong, UpGuardThree alternatives
FAIR-U, Open-Source / Spreadsheet Approach, cyber-risk-quantThree alternatives
C-Trust, Centraleyes, FairCRQLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceFairCRQno first choiceagainst: Kovrr, RiskLens, SAFE Security
Two alternatives
CoreCyber, vCISO LiteQwen 3.7 FlashFairCRQno first choiceChangedRiskLensFairCRQno first choiceagainst: Archer, Citalid, Kovrr, RiskLens, SAFE Security, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management
Two alternatives
LogicGate Risk Cloud, ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierThree alternatives
Determine, Omeniance, OpenFAIRTwo alternatives
CoreCyber, OpenFAIRKimi K2CoreCyberagainst: Axio360, Balbix, CyberSaint CyberStrong, ThreatConnect RQCyberStrongChangedagainst: SAFE SecurityFairCRQagainst: Axio360, BalbixFairCRQagainst: UpGuardFairCRQagainst: Axio, Citalid, FAIR-U, Kovrr, RiskLens, SAFE Security
Two alternatives
SAFE Security Free Assessments, cyber-risk-quantTwo alternatives
Kovrr, vCISO LiteTwo alternatives
CoreCyber, ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierTwo alternatives
CISA CSET, CoreCyberSix alternatives
Axio360, CoreCyber, Cyrisma, Kovrr, Risk Cloud Quantify, UpGuardGLM 4.7 FlashXRiskLensagainst: Axio360, Safe Security SAFEUpGuardChangedCoreCyber, FairCRQFairCRQno first choiceagainst: AuditBoard, Axio, Citalid, Drata, Kovrr, LogicGate Risk Cloud, OneTrust, Optro, RiskLens, SAFE One, SAFE Security, Scalepad, Sharken, Vanta
One alternative
UpGuardOne alternative
KovrrFour alternatives
RiskLens, SAFE Security, ThreatConnect Risk Quantifier, UpGuardThree alternatives
CyberQRM, Derive, Wolferdawg Free Cybersecurity Risk AssessmentMiniMax M2.5CoreCyberagainst: Balbix, Bitsight Financial Quantification, ThreatConnectKovrrChangedCoreCyber, Microsoft Secure Scorecyber-risk-quantagainst: Axio, Hyperproof, RiskLens, SAFE Securityno first choiceagainst: Archer, Citalid, Kovrr, LogicGate Risk Cloud, MetricStream, Resolver, RiskLens, SAFE Security
Three alternatives
FairCRQ, SAFE Security, UpGuardTwo alternatives
SAFE One, UpGuardFour alternatives
Axio360, Balbix, SAFE Security, ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierGPT-6 LunaFairCRQHubSpotChangedAxio360 QuantificationNinety Proagainst: FAIR-Uno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
QuantiShield, SAFE OneOne alternative
PipedriveFour alternatives
FAIR-U, Kovrr, SAFE One, Securemetrics Community EditionOne alternative
Open Risk RegisterMuse Glimmer 30BCoreCyberagainst: CyberSaint CyberStrongFairCRQChangedCoreCyber, FairCRQ, UpGuardagainst: RiskLens, SAFE SecurityCoreCyber, FAIR-U for Cyberno first choiceagainst: Axio, Kovrr, RiskLens, SAFE Securityagainst: Axio, Citalid, Kovirr, RiskLens, SAFE One, SAFE Security
Two alternatives
Axio360, FAIR InstituteTwo alternatives
Kovrr, UpGuardThree alternatives
Axio360, CyberSaint CyberStrong, ThreatConnect Risk QuantifierThree alternatives
Cyber Tzar, CyberGrade, Open source DIYBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:24 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:18 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:25 | yes | 21 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:52 | yes | 22 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:03 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:33 | yes | 12 | 47 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:01 | yes | 22 | 95 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:23 | yes | 6 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:56 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:10 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:07 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:42 | yes | 19 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:16 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:51 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:28 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 25 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:51 | yes | 18 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:00 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:59 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:36 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:03 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 9 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:01 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:47 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:23 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 13 | 510 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:36 | yes | 12 | 37 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 4 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:33 | yes | 11 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:24 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:41 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:41 | yes | 9 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:02 | yes | 23 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:54 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:30 | yes | 9 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:26 | yes | 17 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 22 | 75 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:19 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:50 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:11 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:40 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:45 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:41 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:26 | yes | 9 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:44 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:46 | yes | 19 | 69 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:05 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:04 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 19 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:44 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:36 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:43 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:56 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:12 | yes | 7 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:33 | yes | 13 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 21 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:56 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:15 | yes | 22 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:58 | yes | 17 | 55 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:36 | yes | 22 | 180 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 20 | 84 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:47 | yes | 4 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:30 | yes | 16 | 20 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
BitSight read as Bitsight Financial Quantification
Bitsight read as Bitsight Financial Quantification
CyberSaint read as CyberSaint CyberStrong
CyberSaint (CyberStrong platform) read as CyberSaint CyberStrong
CyberSaint (CyberStrong) read as CyberSaint CyberStrong
SAFE read as SAFE One
Safe read as SAFE One
Unresolved, counted raw
AIR (by ServiceNow)
Allianz Cyber Risk Assessment
Ashish-1357/Cyber-risk-quantification (GitHub)
Axio360 Quantification
CISA's Cyber Security Evaluation Tool (CSET)
CoreCyber Starter Plan
Cyber Tzar
CyberGrade
Cyentia
DealHub
Determine
FAIR model
FAIR-U for Cyber
Full RiskLens
HubSpot-style revenue tools
Kovirr
Kovrr Carrier/Underwriting editions
Microsoft Defender Risk Score
Monte Carlo Excel / Google Sheets Templates
NCSC
NIST 800-30
Omeniance
Open source DIY
Open-Source / Spreadsheet Approach
Qualys TruRisk
QuantiShield
SAFE Security Free Assessments
Safe Security Implementations
Safe Security SAFE
Salesforce CPQ
Scalepad
Securemetrics Community Edition
ServiceNow Risk Management
Sharken
Wolferdawg Free Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.