Breach and attack simulation for small business buyers
Asked as “breach and attack simulation platform”, and as “security control validation tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
20%
Contested · AttackIQ Flex 18%
20Vanta18AttackIQ Flex16Cymulate46others
20% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+7Since October 2026: 13% → 20%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Vanta held the lead, +7 points on 13%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Vanta20%Contested▲+7Since October 2026: 13% → 20%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-market
Cymulate35%Contested▲+11Since October 2026: 24% → 35%, +11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseCymulate27%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 24% → 27%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Vanta20%Contested▲+7Since October 2026: 13% → 20%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketCymulate35%Contested▲+11Since October 2026: 24% → 35%, +11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseCymulate27%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 24% → 27%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Vanta20%0%22accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 13% → 20%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.13% → 20%
Vanta20%0%22accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 13% → 20%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.13% → 20%02
AttackIQ Flex18%0%23accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 10% → 18%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 18%
AttackIQ Flex18%0%23accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 10% → 18%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 18%03Cymulate16%36%53criticized challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 10% → 16%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 16%
Cymulate16%36%53criticized challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 10% → 16%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 16%04Infection Monkey12%8%26accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 11% → 12%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 12%
05
Picus Security Validation Platform4%23%47accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%
Picus Security Validation Platform4%23%47accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%06
Horizon3.ai NodeZero4%0%15accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%
Horizon3.ai NodeZero4%0%15accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%07
Pentera2%55%40criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Pentera2%55%40criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%08
SafeBreach2%77%43criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
SafeBreach2%77%43criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11Mandiant Security Validation0%92%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10
AttackIQ0%57%37criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
AttackIQ0%57%37criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%09
Atomic Red Team0%14%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Atomic Red Team0%14%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Cymulate vs Atomic Red TeamCymulate vs AttackIQCymulate vs PenteraCymulate vs Infection MonkeyPicus Security Validation Platform vs AttackIQ FlexPicus Security Validation Platform vs MITRE CalderaPicus Security Validation Platform vs Atomic Red TeamPicus Security Validation Platform vs AttackIQPicus Security Validation Platform vs PenteraPicus Security Validation Platform vs Infection MonkeyAttackIQ Flex vs MITRE CalderaAttackIQ Flex vs Atomic Red TeamAttackIQ Flex vs AttackIQAttackIQ Flex vs PenteraAttackIQ Flex vs Infection MonkeyMITRE Caldera vs Atomic Red TeamMITRE Caldera vs AttackIQMITRE Caldera vs PenteraMITRE Caldera vs Infection MonkeyAtomic Red Team vs AttackIQAtomic Red Team vs PenteraAtomic Red Team vs Infection MonkeyAttackIQ vs PenteraAttackIQ vs Infection MonkeyPentera vs Infection Monkey
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203I04
050607080910M11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Vanta20%
Vanta20%02AttackIQ Flex18%
AttackIQ Flex18%03Cymulate16%
Cymulate16%04Infection Monkey12%
05Picus Security Validation Platform4%
Picus Security Validation Platform4%06Horizon3.ai NodeZero4%
Horizon3.ai NodeZero4%07Pentera2%
Pentera2%08SafeBreach2%
SafeBreach2%09Atomic Red Team0%
Atomic Red Team0%10AttackIQ0%
AttackIQ0%11Mandiant Security Validation0%
What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SafeBreach77%
33 of 43 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Avoid if you are not a large enterprise with a mature security operations team and a six-figure budget for security validation.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Pentera55%
22 of 40 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Avoid or be very cautious about Pentera, SafeBreach, AttackIQ, Picus, and Cymulate if you have a small team” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
AttackIQ57%
21 of 37 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Not specifically designed for or proven to work well with small, budget‑constrained environments.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Cymulate36%
19 of 53 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid starting with Cymulate, SafeBreach, Pentera, or Mandiant if the budget is very constrained” Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 853 links across 198 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 59 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G247 answers · 84 citations · 13 models
35 answers · 36 citations · 12 models
publisher (Gane)26 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
21 answers · 25 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Picus Security19 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Guideflow19 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Cymulate16 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SourceForge15 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SafeBreach14 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SOCRadar14 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
34 answers · 12 models
26 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 12 models
18 answers · 7 models
17 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 7 models
17 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best breach and attack simulation platform”, “breach and attack simulation platform”, “breach and attack simulation platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanta vanta.com | 20% | 381 | 40,500 | 1,219 | 72,260 | 120 | ||
| AttackIQ Flex attackiq.com | 18% | 35 | 10 | 0 | 1,414 | 11 | ||
| Cymulate cymulate.com | 16% | 177 | 720 | 16 | 16,407 | 3 | ||
| Infection Monkey | 12% | 880 | 11 | |||||
| Picus Security Validation Platform picussecurity.com | 4% | 154 | 20 | 0 | 81,880 | $1,031 | 25 | 3 |
| Horizon3.ai horizon3.ai Horizon3.ai NodeZero 4% | 4% | 32 | 40 | 1 | 7,505 company | $431 | 7 | |
| BreachLock breachlock.com | 4% | 81 | 590 | 6 | 2,479 | 22 | ||
| MITRE Caldera mitre.org | 4% | 18 | 390 | 10 | ||||
| SafeBreach safebreach.com SafeBreach Validate 2%, SafeBreach 2% | 4% | 149 | 480 | 3 | 1,058 | 8 | 1 | |
| NodeZero | 2% | 720 | 15 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 19 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, picussecurity.com, reddit.com, safebreach.com, sourceforge.net, startupstash.com). The first result for “best breach and attack simulation platform” is sourceforge.net.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best breach and attack simulation platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which security control validation tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top breach and attack simulation platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best breach and attack simulation platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a breach and attack simulation platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which breach and attack simulation platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5BreachLockno first choiceChangedAttackIQagainst: Pentera, SafeBreachAttackIQ Flexagainst: Cymulate, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreachno first choiceagainst: Cymulate, Pentera, SafeBreach
Three alternatives
AttackIQ Flex, Cymulate, ValidatoFive alternatives
BreachLock, Cymulate, Infection Monkey, Picus Security Validation Platform, ValidatoThree alternatives
Atomic Red Team, BreachLock, Defendify All-In-One Cybersecurity SolutionGPT-5.4 miniPicus Security Validation PlatformCymulateChangedagainst: AttackIQCymulateAttackIQ Flexno first choiceagainst: AttackIQ, Broadcom, Pentera, SCYTHE, SafeBreach
Two alternatives
Pentera, SafeBreachOne alternative
AttackIQ FlexFour alternatives
AttackIQ, Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreachThree alternatives
AttackIQ Platform, OpenAEV, Picus Security Validation PlatformGemini 3.5 FlashCymulateHorizon3.ai NodeZeroChangedCymulateInfection Monkeyagainst: AttackIQ, SafeBreachno first choiceagainst: Atomic Red Team, AttackIQ, MITRE Caldera, Pentera, SafeBreach, Uber's Metta, XM Cyber
Three alternatives
Atomic Red Team, Pentera, Picus Security Validation PlatformThree alternatives
Atomic Red Team, Cymulate, VantaFour alternatives
Atomic Red Team, Horizon3.ai NodeZero, Infection Monkey, Picus Security Validation PlatformFour alternatives
Atomic Red Team, Cymulate, OpenAEV, Picus Security Validation PlatformPerplexity SonarBreachLockagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Mandiant Security Validation, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreachVantaChangedagainst: AttackIQ, Pentera, Picus Security Validation PlatformAttackIQ FlexAttackIQ Flexagainst: Cymulate, Mandiant Security Validation, Pentera, SafeBreachno first choiceagainst: Atomic Red Team, Infection Monkey, MITRE Caldera, Mandiant Security Validation, Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platform, SCYTHE, SafeBreach
One alternative
NodeZeroFour alternatives
Cymulate, Horizon3.ai NodeZero, Pentera, Picus Security Validation PlatformTwo alternatives
BreachLock, MITRE Caldera plus Atomic Red TeamGrok 4.20Cymulateagainst: AttackIQ, Infection Monkey, Pentera, Qualys, SkyboxVantaChangedPicus Security Validation Platformagainst: Mandiant Security Validation, OpenBAS, Pentera, SafeBreachMITRE Calderaagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreachno first choiceagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Pentera, SafeBreach
Two alternatives
Horizon3.ai NodeZero, Picus Security Validation PlatformFour alternatives
Drata, Hyperproof, Scrut Automation, ValidatoThree alternatives
AttackIQ, Cymulate, NodeZeroFour alternatives
Atomic Red Team, Horizon3.ai NodeZero, Infection Monkey, Stratus Red TeamMistral SmallInfection Monkey, VantaVantaChangedCymulate, Defendify, PenteraAttackIQ FlexIBM Randori, Penteraagainst: XM Cyberagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreach
Three alternatives
Cymulate, Pentera, Picus Security Validation PlatformTwo alternatives
Drata, SecureframeThree alternatives
AttackIQ, SafeBreach, XM CyberTwo alternatives
Adaptive Security, NodeZeroFive alternatives
AttackIQ, BreachLock, PlexTrac, SCYTHE, SafeBreachDeepSeek V4 FlashAttackIQ Flexagainst: Cymulate, Pentera, Picus Security Validation PlatformAttackIQ FlexHeldagainst: Mandiant Security Validation, Pentera, SafeBreachHorizon3.ai NodeZeroagainst: SafeBreachInfection Monkeyagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Pentera, SafeBreachno first choiceagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Mandiant Security Validation, Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreach
One alternative
Infection MonkeyFive alternatives
CIS Gap Assessment, Drata, Infection Monkey, Picus Security Validation Platform, VantaFour alternatives
AttackIQ, Cymulate, Picus Security Validation Platform, SCYTHETwo alternatives
Horizon3.ai NodeZero, OpenBASThree alternatives
Atomic Red Team, Infection Monkey, MITRE CalderaLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceSafeBreach Validate, ValidatoChangedno first choiceagainst: SafeBreachAttackIQ Flexno first choiceagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Pentera, SafeBreach
Two alternatives
Hyperproof, IRM Consulting & AdvisoryFour alternatives
AttackIQ Flex, Cymulate, Pentera, Picus Security Validation PlatformFour alternatives
Cymulate, Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreachQwen 3.7 FlashHorizon3.ai NodeZeroVantaChangedCensylusagainst: Tenable BASNodeZeroagainst: Mandiant Security Validation, SafeBreachImmersiQagainst: Mandiant Security Validation, Palo Altoagainst: Cisco, Dell, EMC, IBM, OpenVAS, Tenable Nessus
Two alternatives
Infection Monkey, VantaThree alternatives
OneTrust, Secureframe, TermlyThree alternatives
Pentera, Rapid7 InsightVM, SafeBreachThree alternatives
MITRE Caldera, Prelude Operator, Qualys Security CloudFour alternatives
CyberCube, Cyble, KnowBe4, ProofpointKimi K2Cymulate, Picus Security Validation Platformagainst: AttackIQ, Pentera, SafeBreachVantaChangedHorizon3.ai NodeZeroagainst: AttackIQCymulateagainst: Mandiant Security Validation, SafeBreachno first choiceagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Pentera, SafeBreach
Three alternatives
Scrut Automation, Sprinto, Strike GraphThree alternatives
Cymulate, Picus Security Validation Platform, SCYTHEThree alternatives
Atomic Red Team, Infection Monkey, Picus Security Validation PlatformGLM 4.7 FlashXCymulateagainst: SafeBreachVantaChangedAttackIQ Flexagainst: Cymulate, SafeBreachIntruderno first choiceagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreach
Two alternatives
Pentera, Picus Security Validation PlatformThree alternatives
Drata, Secureframe, SprintoTwo alternatives
Pentera, Picus Security Validation PlatformThree alternatives
Astra Security, Burp Suite, OWASP ZAPMiniMax M2.5Cymulateagainst: SafeBreachVantaChangedCymulate, Picus Security Validation PlatformMITRE Calderaagainst: Cymulate, Picus Security Validation PlatformCymulate, SafeBreachagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Mandiant Security Validation, Pentera, SafeBreach
Three alternatives
AttackIQ, NodeZero, Picus Security Validation PlatformTwo alternatives
AttackIQ Flex, Infection MonkeyTwo alternatives
AttackIQ, PenteraThree alternatives
Atomic Red Team, Infection Monkey, Stratus Red TeamOne alternative
MITRE CalderaGPT-6 LunaAttackIQ FlexVantaChangedAttackIQ Flexagainst: SafeBreachInfection Monkeyno first choiceagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Microsoft Defender's Attack Simulation Training, SafeBreach
One alternative
CIS's free CSATThree alternatives
Cymulate, OpenAEV Community Edition, Picus Security Validation PlatformOne alternative
AttackIQ FlexMuse Glimmer 30BInfection Monkey, OpenBASVantaChangedCymulateagainst: SafeBreachAttackIQ Flex, Infection Monkeyno first choiceagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, SafeBreachagainst: AttackIQ, Cymulate, Mandiant Security Validation, OpenBAS, Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platform, SafeBreach
Three alternatives
AttackIQ Flex, Horizon3.ai NodeZero, VantaFour alternatives
AttackIQ Flex, Cymulate, Drata, Infection MonkeyFour alternatives
AttackIQ, Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platform, The NodeZero PlatformOne alternative
CalderaFive alternatives
Adaptive Security, Defendify All-In-One Cybersecurity Solution, Pentera, Picus Security Validation Platform, Vonahi Security vPenTestBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:48 | yes | 14 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:56 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:07 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:33 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:13 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:17 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 9 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 25 | 60 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:13 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:40 | yes | 1 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:27 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:49 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:29 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:49 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:15 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 25 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:56 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:41 | yes | 19 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:51 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:18 | yes | 5 | 62 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:29 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:17 | yes | 18 | 13 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:23 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:49 | yes | 9 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:28 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 21 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:54 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:52 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:55 | yes | 25 | 46 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:00 | yes | 23 | 39 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 5 | 39 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 6 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:00 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:55 | yes | 11 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:47 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:16 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:40 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:21 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:19 | yes | 20 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 20 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:17 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:23 | yes | 19 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 19:02 | yes | 3 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:20 | yes | 23 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:00 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:55 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:10 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:10 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:11 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:54 | yes | 19 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:59 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:33 | yes | 15 | 42 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 22 | 47 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:13 | no | 0 | 114 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 2 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:02 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 16 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:29 | yes | 8 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:30 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:33 | yes | 15 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:29 | yes | 24 | 59 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:36 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:53 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:41 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:31 | yes | 25 | 84 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:09 | yes | 24 | 52 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:53 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 11 | 23 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Horizon3.ai read as Horizon3.ai NodeZero
Horizon3.ai (NodeZero) read as Horizon3.ai NodeZero
Mandiant read as Mandiant Security Validation
Picus read as Picus Security Validation Platform
Picus Security read as Picus Security Validation Platform
Unresolved, counted raw
AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform
ART
AttackIQ Platform
AvalonX
CIS Gap Assessment
CIS's free CSAT
Censylus
Cronus Cyber
Defendify All-In-One Cybersecurity
FireCompass
IRM Consulting & Advisory
ImmersiQ
MITRE Caldera plus Atomic Red Team
Metasploit Framework
Microsoft Defender's Attack Simulation Training
OpenAEV Community Edition
Prelude Detect
Qualys Security Cloud (VMDR Add-on)
Rapid7 Insight Platform
Safe Breach
SafeBreeze
Secova
Simulations Labs
Stratus
Tenable BAS
Uber's Metta
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.