Index › IT › Security operations › SOAR › Small business · November 2026 Edition

SOAR platforms for small business buyers

Asked as “SOAR platform”, and as “security orchestration and automated response tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 58 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
41%
Clear leader
41Tines12ManageEngine Log36010Blumira36others

41% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▼−2Since October 2026: 43% → 41%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Tines held the lead, −2 points on 43%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Tines41%2%60endorsed leader▼−2Since October 2026: 43% → 41%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.43% → 41%
02ManageEngine Log36012%8%26accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 7% → 12%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 12%
03Shuffle10%3%31accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 8% → 10%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 10%
04Blumira10%0%18accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 17% → 10%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.17% → 10%
05Microsoft Sentinel5%15%47accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 5%
06Swimlane Turbine5%29%34criticized challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 5%
07Torq3%26%31criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 5% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 3%
08Rapid7 InsightConnect2%0%37accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
09Google Security Operations SOAR Lab in the set2%17%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11IBM QRadar SOAR0%100%21criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Cortex XSOAR0%90%50criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12Splunk SOAR0%78%59criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
10BlinkOps0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Security Operations SOAR is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models one time of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Tines41%
02ManageEngine Log36012%
03Shuffle10%
04Blumira10%
05Microsoft Sentinel5%
06Swimlane Turbine5%
07Torq3%
08Rapid7 InsightConnect2%
09Google Security Operations SOAR2%
10BlinkOps0%
11IBM QRadar SOAR0%
12Splunk SOAR0%
13Cortex XSOAR0%

What they warned about

Eight of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.20, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash and Kimi K2 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Splunk SOAR
78%
46 of 59 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 21 hard negative
“Splunk SOAR has a negative rate of 60% and is labeled as a "criticized challenger," ... These platforms may be worth avoiding or approaching with caution for small businesses.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Cortex XSOAR
90%
45 of 50 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 18 hard negative
“implementing a traditional enterprise Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) platform—such as Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR or Splunk SOAR—is usually a trap” Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt
IBM QRadar SOAR
100%
21 of 21 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 15 hard negative
“Highly not recommended: Received essentially zero consideration from AI models evaluating small business needs” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Swimlane Turbine
29%
10 of 34 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Listed alongside the "enterprise giants" as generally too heavy and expensive for small teams.” Kimi K2, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 849 links across 194 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 57 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

32 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G231 answers · 49 citations · 13 models
30 answers · 32 citations · 8 models
29 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
publisher (Gane)26 answers · 38 citations · 10 models
25 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
21 answers · 21 citations · 7 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Tines13 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best soar platform”, “soar platform”, “soar platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsGoogle ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Tines tines.com41%16822,2003,16710,88897
ManageEngine parent site
ManageEngine Log360 12%
12%1398,100675
Shuffle shuffler.io10%4560,50019,5501,726
Blumira blumira.com10%1081,300128,06010
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Sentinel 5%, Microsoft Defender 0%
5%3712,240,000403,136
Swimlane Turbine swimlane.com5%13650015,132376
Torq torq.io3%986,6001,4675,9666
Rapid7 parent site
Rapid7 InsightConnect 2%
2%5814,800798
Google Security Operations google.dev
Google Security Operations SOAR 2%
2%383905881,346 company109
TheHive + Cortex2%

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 0 of them are among the sites the models cited here. The first result for “best soar platform” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best SOAR platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which security orchestration and automated response tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top SOAR platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SOAR platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a SOAR platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SOAR platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Shuffle
Four alternativesRapid7 InsightConnect, SIRP, Splunk SOAR, Tines
against: Cortex XSOAR
BlumiraChanged
Three alternativesManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Shuffle
Tines
Four alternativesRapid7 InsightConnect, Shuffle, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
against: Cortex XSOAR
Shuffle
Five alternativesBlink, D3 Security Smart SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Tines
no first choiceagainst: IBM QRadar SOAR, ManageEngine Log360, Splunk SOAR
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Sentinel, Tines
Two alternativesCortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
Microsoft SentinelChanged
Two alternativesCortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
Tines
Four alternativesCortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Torq
Shuffle
One alternativeTines
against: Cortex XSOAR
no first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
Gemini 3.5 FlashTines
Three alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Shuffle, Torq
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
TinesHeld
Three alternativesBlumira, Microsoft Sentinel, Shuffle
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
Tines
Five alternativesBlinkOps, Google Security Operations SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel Logic Apps, Shuffle, Torq
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
Shuffle, Tines
Two alternativesWazuh, n8n
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
Tines, Torq
Five alternativesBlinkOps, CrowdStrike, Microsoft Sentinel, SentinelOne, Trend Micro
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, n8n, self-hosted Shuffle
Perplexity SonarTines
Two alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Torq
TinesHeld
One alternativeMicrosoft Sentinel
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
Tines
Four alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
Tines
Two alternativesLogsign, Microsoft Sentinel
against: Cortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, Splunk SOAR
no first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
Grok 4.20Tines
Two alternativesManageEngine Log360, Torq
against: Cortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
ManageEngine Log360Changed
One alternativeFortiSOAR
against: BlinkOps, Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Sumo Logic
Tines
Four alternativesManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
TheHive + Cortex
Four alternativesBlumira, ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Sumo Logic Cloud SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
Tines, Torq
Two alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect
against: Cortex XSOAR, Exabeam Incident Responder, IBM QRadar SOAR, Shuffle, Splunk SOAR, TheHive, n8n
against: Cortex XSOAR, DFLabs IncMan, Exabeam Incident Responder, IBM QRadar SOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, Splunk SOAR, Torq
Mistral SmallTines
Two alternativesRapid7 InsightConnect, Shuffle
against: Splunk SOAR
TinesHeld
Two alternativesRapid7 InsightConnect, Splunk SOAR
Swimlane Turbine, Tines
Three alternativesBlumira, KnowBe4 PhishER, Torq
Tines
Three alternativesDevo SOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, ManageEngine Log360
no first choice
Two alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, TheHive
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Torq AI SOC Platform
DeepSeek V4 FlashTines
Two alternativesManageEngine Log360, Shuffle
against: Google Security Operations SOAR
Huntress, ManageEngine Log360Changed
Two alternativesMicrosoft Defender for Cloud, Torq
Torq
Four alternativesBlinkOps, ManageEngine Log360, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar, Splunk SOAR
Blumira
Five alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Shuffle, Swimlane Turbine, TheHive + Cortex
Tines
Four alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Shuffle, Swimlane Turbine
against: Cortex XSOAR, Torq
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
Llama 4 MaverickTines
Three alternativesRapid7 InsightConnect, Shuffle, Splunk SOAR
TinesHeld
Three alternativesMicrosoft Purview Suite for Microsoft 365 Business Premium, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Splunk SOAR
Devo SOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, TinesGoogle Security Operations SOAR, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine
Two alternativesBlumira, ManageEngine Log360
no first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
Qwen 3.7 FlashManageEngine Log360
Three alternativesBlumira, FortiSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar
TinesChanged
Two alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
Tines
Four alternativesBlumira, Microsoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
against: IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
Swimlane Turbine, Wazuh
Two alternativesTheHive, Tines
Swimlane Turbine, Tenable Security Cloud
Three alternativesExabeam Incident Responder, Microsoft Sentinel, Zoho Security Operations
against: ServiceNow, Splunk SOAR
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
Kimi K2Blumira
Two alternativesRapid7 InsightConnect, Tines
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR
Microsoft SentinelChanged
Three alternativesBlumira, Shuffle, Tines
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
Tines
Three alternativesManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Torq
against: Splunk SOAR
OpenSOAR
Four alternativesBlumira, Lockwell, ManageEngine Log360, OpenSecOps SOAR
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
ManageEngine Log360
Three alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Tines, Torq
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
against: Cortex XSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
GLM 4.7 FlashXBlumira
Two alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Tines
against: FortiSOAR, Splunk SOAR
BlumiraHeld
One alternativeTines
Tines
Four alternativesBlinkOps, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
Blumira
Three alternativesBlinkOps, ManageEngine Log360, Tines
Tines
Two alternativesManageEngine Log360, Rapid7 InsightConnect
against: Splunk SOAR
against: Cortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
MiniMax M2.5ManageEngine Log360
Four alternativesGoogle Security Operations SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine
ManageEngine Log360Held
Two alternativesBlumira, FortiSOAR
Tines
Six alternativesBlink, BlinkOps, ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Torq
Shuffle
Three alternativesBlumira, ManageEngine Log360, Rapid7 InsightConnect
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
no first choice
Six alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Shuffle, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Torp
against: Cortex XSOAR
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Torq
GPT-6 LunaTines
Two alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Shuffle
TinesHeld
One alternativeMicrosoft Sentinel
Tines
Three alternativesMicrosoft Sentinel, Shuffle, Torq
Shuffle
One alternativeTines
against: Microsoft Sentinel
no first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, Torq
Muse Glimmer 30BTines
One alternativeRapid7 InsightConnect
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
TinesHeld
Two alternativesRapid7 InsightConnect, Shuffle
Shuffle, Tines
Two alternativesGoogle Security Operations SOAR, ManageEngine Log360
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Torq AI SOC Platform
ManageEngine Log360, Tines
Six alternativesBlumira, Google Security Operations SOAR, Lockwell, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine
against: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR
no first choice
One alternativeTines
against: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:06yes97 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 17:08yes35 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:17yes922 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:28yes103 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:32yes814 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:07yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:20yes2229 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 19:43yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:36yes526 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:30yes2061 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:38yes2494 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:00yes540 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:17yes215 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:07yes1922 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:50yes179 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:15yes320 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:02no014 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 15:13yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:00yes59 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:52yes53 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:31yes2521 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:47yes54 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 19:35yes1423 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:28yes2326 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 17:00yes1469 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 19:11yes837 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:42yes313 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:45yes1316 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 19:43yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 18:22yes58 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 19:14no017 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:10yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 19:07yes1516 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 17:53yes523 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:17yes2330 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:15yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 13:34yes521 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:16yes2024 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:04yes2194 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 19:00yes2147 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:36yes518 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:34yes2442 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 19:12yes108 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:24yes25 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:49yes1222 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:08yes104 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 19:35yes511 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:52yes53 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:36yes2429 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:01yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:27no027 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:02yes1020 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:03yes917 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:30yes1067 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:56yes314 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:09yes1421 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:18no05 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:34no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:40no017 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:42yes106 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:10yes512 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 18:24no09 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:15yes2030 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:27yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:28no031 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:54yes2430 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:13yes1569 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:10yes1030 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:18yes418 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:13yes1518 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:48yes159 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 17:16yes58 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 14:01yes1022 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 18:12yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 19:07yes1012 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:48yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:43yes2137 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:58yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:35yes1349 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:44yes2562 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:32yes1549 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:42yes1361 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:23yes218 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:10yes1421 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
D3 Security read as D3 Security Smart SOAR
Devo read as Devo SOAR
Exabeam read as Exabeam Incident Responder
Exabeam (formerly LogRhythm RespondX) read as Exabeam Incident Responder
Google SecOps read as Google Security Operations SOAR
Google Security Operations read as Google Security Operations SOAR
Microsoft Sentinel + Logic Apps read as Microsoft Sentinel
Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR read as Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR read as Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR (or XSIAM) read as Cortex XSOAR
Splunk read as Splunk SOAR
Swimlane read as Swimlane Turbine
Swimlane (Turbine) read as Swimlane Turbine
Unresolved, counted raw
CrowdStrike Fusion
DFLabs IncMan
ManageEngine Log360's native SOAR
Microsoft Sentinel Logic Apps
OpenSecOps SOAR
SentinelOne Singularity Workflows
Tenable Security Cloud
Torp
Zoho Security Operations
self-hosted Shuffle
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← SIEMTPRM →