Splunk SOAR is a security orchestration, automation and response product from Splunk · splunk.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Tines is first at 41%.
Tines is first at 47%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Cortex XSOAR is first at 55%.
“Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Splunk SOAR are top recommendations”Mistral Small · Paraphrase question · first choice
“I recommend Splunk SOAR (formerly Phantom) as the top choice.”Grok 4.20 · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Choose Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk SOAR if your SIEM is already based in Azure/Sentinel or Splunk Enterprise Security.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“If you need a more traditional, full-featured enterprise platform, Cisco Secure SOAR (ex-Splunk) remains a robust choice.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Paraphrase question · alternative
“Avoid for tight budgets: Enterprise-heavy tools like Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, or FortiSOAR”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Avoid for Mid-Sized B2B: ... Splunk SOAR – Similarly heavy on licensing and complexity”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Paraphrase question · warning
“Avoid being swayed by the largest enterprise platforms (Splunk SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR)”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Scale-constrained question · warning
“typically start at $10K–$100K+ per year, making them unsuitable for limited budgets”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Splunk SOAR, over the 197 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 167 | 45 | Compare → | |
| 140 | 60 | Compare → | |
| 115 | 5 | View → | |
| 107 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 90 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 88 | 2 | View → | |
| 49 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 44 | 1 | View → | |
| 35 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 35 | 2 | View → |
What the models named instead of Splunk SOAR →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Splunk SOAR's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 177 of the 197 answers that named Splunk SOAR and are not a share of its labels.
440 of the 493 domain citations in answers naming Splunk SOAR came from a third party's page. Fifty-three were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |