3 categories · RankedTorq
Torq is an AI SOC platform and SOAR product that helps security teams triage, investigate, and respond to threats · torq.io ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Tines is first at 41%.
Tines is first at 47%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Cortex XSOAR is first at 55%.
Why models recommend it
“Platforms like Tines, Swimlane Turbine, or Torq offer modern visual workflow builders”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Negative question · first choice
“Hyperautomation focus, fast deployment, good for mid-size with strong AI-driven workflows.”Grok 4.20 · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“look at Security Automation Platforms (like Tines, Torq, or Swimlane)”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · first choice
“I'd also put Torq on the shortlist if you want to evaluate a more AI-focused security automation platform”GPT-6 Luna · Paraphrase question · alternative
What gives them pause
“While newer, it has a 30% negative rate, with some users reporting integration and scalability issues”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“Torq is generally not recommended for tight budgets”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Other Niche or Emerging Enterprise Browsers (e.g., Torq, SecureFrame, or lesser-known forks) ... Smaller vendors may have weaker update cadences”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“Vendors that slipped in recent positioning — Logpoint, ManageEngine, Torq — deserve extra scrutiny”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Torq, over the 104 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 90 | 37 | Compare → | |
| 90 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 84 | 26 | Compare → | |
| 70 | 1 | View → | |
| 68 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 51 | 1 | View → | |
| 33 | 0 | View → | |
| 28 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 24 | 1 | View → | |
| 23 | 2 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of Torq →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Torq's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- security teams
- Customers named
- Valvoline, FICO, Kenvue, Check Point, BigID, Deepwatch, RSM, Lennar
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 98 of the 104 answers that named Torq and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
260 of the 283 domain citations in answers naming Torq came from a third party's page. Twenty-three were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 506 | 25 | 2026-08-10 | DLP, SOAR | |
| Blog | 356 | 22 | 2026-09-25 | SOAR, MDR | |
| Conference or event | 219 | 44 | 2026-09-21 | SOAR | |
| Glossary or explainer | 17 | 1 | 2026-09-08 | SOAR | |
| Case study | 14 | 1 | 2026-08-10 | ||
| Comparison | 12 | 0 | 2026-04-09 | SOAR, SIEM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 9 | 0 | 2026-05-12 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | 0 | 2023-04-20 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-02-25 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Blog soc maturity blog
- 2026-09-24Jev security alert triage blog
- 2026-09-23Fortune 500 retailer blog
- 2026-09-23Global hospitality leader blog
- 2026-09-21Cyber defense horizons conference or event
- 2026-09-11From agreement to action ai soc adoption blog
Events in person
- September 11, 2026Upper Deck Golf at PNC ParkPNC Park, Pittsburgh, US · hosted
- July 18, 2026WWE Saturday Night’s Main EventMadison Square Garden, New York, US · hosted
- June 27, 2026World Cup Watch Party with Torq and GripBlack Market Miami, Miami, US · hosted
As the event pages on torq.io state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page torq.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.