SOAR platforms · November 2026 Edition
Swimlane Turbine vs Splunk SOAR
Two of fourteen models named Swimlane Turbine first on the direct prompt; zero named Splunk SOAR. Swimlane Turbine was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Splunk SOAR by fourteen and Swimlane Turbine carries 44 labels and Splunk SOAR 57, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share8%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%35%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#6A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels4457A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Swimlane Turbine reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Tines was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Tines vs Swimlane Turbine · Tines vs Splunk SOAR · Shuffle vs Swimlane Turbine
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the SOAR platforms page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Swimlane TurbineFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSplunk SOAR
Direct202 against Splunk SOAR
Paraphrase222 against Splunk SOAR
Comparative00
Budget-constrained003 against Splunk SOAR
Scale-constrained001 against Swimlane Turbine · 2 against Splunk SOAR
Negative103 against Swimlane Turbine · 11 against Splunk SOAR
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Swimlane Turbine and Splunk SOAR were named in the same answer 107 times, of the 146 answers naming Swimlane Turbine and the 197 naming Splunk SOAR. In those answers Splunk SOAR took the first choice two times and Swimlane Turbine five.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Swimlane Turbine and Splunk SOAR stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Swimlane Turbine Splunk SOAR first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Swimlane Turbine on the left and Splunk SOAR on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Swimlane Turbine and Splunk SOAR stood in it.
Swimlane Turbine first, Splunk SOAR not the choice
2 of 14 modelsSplunk SOAR was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashSwimlane Turbine, Tines alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel
MiniMax M2.5Cortex XSOAR, Swimlane Turbine alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect
Neither was the first choice, one was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Rapid7 InsightConnect alternatives: Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
GPT-5.4 miniTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, Splunk SOAR
Gemini 3.5 FlashTines alternatives: Microsoft Defender XDR, Microsoft Sentinel, Prophet Security, Simbian, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
Perplexity SonarTines alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine
Mistral SmallTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine
DeepSeek V4 FlashTines alternatives: Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
Llama 4 MaverickTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, IncMan SOAR, Logsign Unified SO Platform, Splunk SOAR, Torq
GLM 4.7 FlashXCortex XSOAR alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines
Muse Glimmer 30BTines alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Shuffle, Swimlane Turbine
Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Grok 4.20Tines alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel, Torq
Kimi K2Tines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, ORNA
GPT-6 LunaTines alternatives: Defender, Microsoft Sentinel, Torq
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Swimlane Turbine leads by five points.
Swimlane Turbine5%#6 of 13Splunk SOAR0%#12 of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
Swimlane Turbine leads by four points.
Swimlane Turbine8%#3 of 13Splunk SOAR4%#6 of 13Enterprise
The order flips: Splunk SOAR leads at enterprise.
Splunk SOAR4%#6 of 11Swimlane Turbine2%#7 of 11What the models said about Swimlane Turbine
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Noted for high negative sentiment, especially regarding cost and complexity for smaller organizations” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Complex setup... Stability issues... Support hours... Maintenance overhead” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Traditional enterprise SOAR. Powerful but can be heavy/expensive.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“Best overall ease of deployment for mid-size B2B with limited SOC engineering: Tines or Swimlane.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Platforms like Tines, Swimlane Turbine, or Torq offer modern visual workflow builders” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR or Swimlane would be the top recommendations” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Splunk SOAR
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid for tight budgets: Enterprise-heavy tools like Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, or FortiSOAR” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for Mid-Sized B2B: ... Splunk SOAR – Similarly heavy on licensing and complexity” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid being swayed by the largest enterprise platforms (Splunk SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · hard negative
“Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Splunk SOAR are top recommendations” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I recommend Splunk SOAR (formerly Phantom) as the top choice.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk SOAR if your SIEM is already based in Azure/Sentinel or Splunk Enterprise Security.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared
Tines vs Swimlane TurbineTines vs Splunk SOARShuffle vs Swimlane TurbineShuffle vs Splunk SOARSwimlane Turbine vs Cortex XSOARSwimlane Turbine vs ManageEngine Log360Swimlane Turbine vs TorqSwimlane Turbine vs Rapid7 InsightConnectCortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOARManageEngine Log360 vs Splunk SOARSplunk SOAR vs TorqSplunk SOAR vs Rapid7 InsightConnectAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full SOAR standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.