SOAR platforms · November 2026 Edition
Swimlane Turbine vs ManageEngine Log360
Two of fourteen models named Swimlane Turbine first on the direct prompt; zero named ManageEngine Log360. Swimlane Turbine was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and ManageEngine Log360 by eight and Swimlane Turbine carries 44 labels and ManageEngine Log360 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
First-choice share8%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%11%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels4418A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Swimlane Turbine reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Tines was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Tines vs Swimlane Turbine · Tines vs ManageEngine Log360 · Shuffle vs Swimlane Turbine
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the SOAR platforms page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Swimlane TurbineFirst choices, of fourteen modelsManageEngine Log360
Direct20
Paraphrase20
Comparative00
Budget-constrained02
Scale-constrained001 against Swimlane Turbine
Negative103 against Swimlane Turbine · 2 against ManageEngine Log360
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Swimlane Turbine and ManageEngine Log360 stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Swimlane Turbine ManageEngine Log360 first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Swimlane Turbine on the left and ManageEngine Log360 on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Swimlane Turbine and ManageEngine Log360 stood in it.
Swimlane Turbine first, ManageEngine Log360 not the choice
2 of 14 modelsManageEngine Log360 was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashSwimlane Turbine, Tines alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel
MiniMax M2.5Cortex XSOAR, Swimlane Turbine alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Rapid7 InsightConnect alternatives: Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
Gemini 3.5 FlashTines alternatives: Microsoft Defender XDR, Microsoft Sentinel, Prophet Security, Simbian, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
Perplexity SonarTines alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine
Mistral SmallTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine
DeepSeek V4 FlashTines alternatives: Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
GLM 4.7 FlashXCortex XSOAR alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines
Muse Glimmer 30BTines alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Shuffle, Swimlane Turbine
Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, Splunk SOAR
Grok 4.20Tines alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel, Torq
Llama 4 MaverickTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, IncMan SOAR, Logsign Unified SO Platform, Splunk SOAR, Torq
Kimi K2Tines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, ORNA
GPT-6 LunaTines alternatives: Defender, Microsoft Sentinel, Torq
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
ManageEngine Log360 leads by seven points.
ManageEngine Log36012%#2 of 13Swimlane Turbine5%#6 of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Swimlane Turbine leads at mid-market.
Swimlane Turbine8%#3 of 13ManageEngine Log3604%#5 of 13Enterprise
Swimlane Turbine leads by two points.
Swimlane Turbine2%#7 of 11ManageEngine Log3600%#– of 11What the models said about Swimlane Turbine
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Noted for high negative sentiment, especially regarding cost and complexity for smaller organizations” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Complex setup... Stability issues... Support hours... Maintenance overhead” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Traditional enterprise SOAR. Powerful but can be heavy/expensive.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“Best overall ease of deployment for mid-size B2B with limited SOC engineering: Tines or Swimlane.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Platforms like Tines, Swimlane Turbine, or Torq offer modern visual workflow builders” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR or Swimlane would be the top recommendations” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about ManageEngine Log360
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“To Avoid | ManageEngine Log360 | Performance & Support issues” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid entirely if your primary need is SOAR.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“ManageEngine Log360 seems to be one of the most affordable options, with pricing starting at around $795 per year for 10 log sources.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“My top recommendation for most budget-conscious companies: ManageEngine Log360 at $795/year” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Tines vs Swimlane TurbineTines vs ManageEngine Log360Shuffle vs Swimlane TurbineShuffle vs ManageEngine Log360Swimlane Turbine vs Cortex XSOARSwimlane Turbine vs Splunk SOARSwimlane Turbine vs TorqSwimlane Turbine vs Rapid7 InsightConnectCortex XSOAR vs ManageEngine Log360ManageEngine Log360 vs Splunk SOARManageEngine Log360 vs TorqManageEngine Log360 vs Rapid7 InsightConnectAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full SOAR standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.