SOAR platforms · November 2026 Edition
ManageEngine Log360 vs Rapid7 InsightConnect
Zero of fourteen models named ManageEngine Log360 first on the direct prompt; one named Rapid7 InsightConnect. ManageEngine Log360 was named by eight of the fourteen models and Rapid7 InsightConnect by ten and ManageEngine Log360 carries 18 labels and Rapid7 InsightConnect 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%11%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1819A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ManageEngine Log360 reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Tines was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Tines vs ManageEngine Log360 · Tines vs Rapid7 InsightConnect · Shuffle vs ManageEngine Log360
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the SOAR platforms page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ManageEngine Log360First choices, of fourteen modelsRapid7 InsightConnect
Direct01
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained20
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against ManageEngine Log360 · 2 against Rapid7 InsightConnect
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where ManageEngine Log360 and Rapid7 InsightConnect stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
ManageEngine Log360 Rapid7 InsightConnect first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ManageEngine Log360 on the left and Rapid7 InsightConnect on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ManageEngine Log360 and Rapid7 InsightConnect stood in it.
Rapid7 InsightConnect first, ManageEngine Log360 not the choice
1 of 14 modelsManageEngine Log360 was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Rapid7 InsightConnect alternatives: Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Perplexity SonarTines alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine
GLM 4.7 FlashXCortex XSOAR alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines
MiniMax M2.5Cortex XSOAR, Swimlane Turbine alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect
Muse Glimmer 30BTines alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Shuffle, Swimlane Turbine
Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, Splunk SOAR
Gemini 3.5 FlashTines alternatives: Microsoft Defender XDR, Microsoft Sentinel, Prophet Security, Simbian, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
Grok 4.20Tines alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel, Torq
Mistral SmallTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine
DeepSeek V4 FlashTines alternatives: Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
Llama 4 MaverickTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, IncMan SOAR, Logsign Unified SO Platform, Splunk SOAR, Torq
Qwen 3.7 FlashSwimlane Turbine, Tines alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel
Kimi K2Tines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, ORNA
GPT-6 LunaTines alternatives: Defender, Microsoft Sentinel, Torq
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
ManageEngine Log360 leads by ten points.
ManageEngine Log36012%#2 of 13Rapid7 InsightConnect2%#8 of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
ManageEngine Log360 leads by two points.
ManageEngine Log3604%#5 of 13Rapid7 InsightConnect2%#8 of 13Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
ManageEngine Log3600%#– of 11Rapid7 InsightConnect0%#– of 11What the models said about ManageEngine Log360
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“To Avoid | ManageEngine Log360 | Performance & Support issues” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid entirely if your primary need is SOAR.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“ManageEngine Log360 seems to be one of the most affordable options, with pricing starting at around $795 per year for 10 log sources.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“My top recommendation for most budget-conscious companies: ManageEngine Log360 at $795/year” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Rapid7 InsightConnect
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“These platforms have received mixed-to-negative reviews from some users” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Rapid7 is more approachable but still requires significant tuning.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Rapid7 InsightConnect (Best Overall for Mid-Market)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Practical no-code automation and natural integration with Rapid7 products; specifically positioned for mid-market teams.” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative
“mentioned as options that provide a good balance of cost and functionality for small to mid-sized businesses” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
Tines vs ManageEngine Log360Tines vs Rapid7 InsightConnectShuffle vs ManageEngine Log360Shuffle vs Rapid7 InsightConnectSwimlane Turbine vs ManageEngine Log360Swimlane Turbine vs Rapid7 InsightConnectCortex XSOAR vs ManageEngine Log360Cortex XSOAR vs Rapid7 InsightConnectManageEngine Log360 vs Splunk SOARManageEngine Log360 vs TorqSplunk SOAR vs Rapid7 InsightConnectTorq vs Rapid7 InsightConnectAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full SOAR standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.