Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › IT › Security operations › SOAR › Splunk SOAR vs Rapid7 InsightConnect
SOAR platforms · November 2026 Edition

Splunk SOAR vs Rapid7 InsightConnect

Zero of fourteen models named Splunk SOAR first on the direct prompt; one named Rapid7 InsightConnect. Splunk SOAR was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Rapid7 InsightConnect by ten and Splunk SOAR carries 57 labels and Rapid7 InsightConnect 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Splunk SOAR

criticized challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Rapid7 InsightConnect

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate35%11%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels5719A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Splunk SOAR reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Tines was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Tines vs Splunk SOAR · Tines vs Rapid7 InsightConnect · Shuffle vs Splunk SOAR

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the SOAR platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Splunk SOARFirst choices, of fourteen modelsRapid7 InsightConnect
Direct012 against Splunk SOAR
Paraphrase202 against Splunk SOAR
Comparative00
Budget-constrained003 against Splunk SOAR
Scale-constrained002 against Splunk SOAR
Negative0011 against Splunk SOAR · 2 against Rapid7 InsightConnect
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Splunk SOAR and Rapid7 InsightConnect were named in the same answer forty-nine times, of the 197 answers naming Splunk SOAR and the 60 naming Rapid7 InsightConnect. In those answers Rapid7 InsightConnect took the first choice four times and Splunk SOAR zero.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Splunk SOAR and Rapid7 InsightConnect stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Splunk SOAR Rapid7 InsightConnect first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Splunk SOAR on the left and Rapid7 InsightConnect on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Splunk SOAR and Rapid7 InsightConnect stood in it.

Rapid7 InsightConnect first, Splunk SOAR an alternative

1 of 14 modelsSplunk SOAR was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Rapid7 InsightConnect alternatives: Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, Splunk SOAR
Perplexity SonarTines alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine
DeepSeek V4 FlashTines alternatives: Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine
Llama 4 MaverickTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, IncMan SOAR, Logsign Unified SO Platform, Splunk SOAR, Torq
GLM 4.7 FlashXCortex XSOAR alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines
MiniMax M2.5Cortex XSOAR, Swimlane Turbine alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect
Muse Glimmer 30BTines alternatives: ManageEngine Log360, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Shuffle, Swimlane Turbine

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Gemini 3.5 FlashTines alternatives: Microsoft Defender XDR, Microsoft Sentinel, Prophet Security, Simbian, Swimlane Turbine, Torq
Grok 4.20Tines alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel, Torq
Mistral SmallTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine
Qwen 3.7 FlashSwimlane Turbine, Tines alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel
Kimi K2Tines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, ORNA
GPT-6 LunaTines alternatives: Defender, Microsoft Sentinel, Torq

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Rapid7 InsightConnect leads by two points.
Rapid7 InsightConnect2%#8 of 13
Splunk SOAR0%#12 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Splunk SOAR leads at mid-market.
Splunk SOAR4%#6 of 13
Rapid7 InsightConnect2%#8 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Splunk SOAR leads by four points.
Splunk SOAR4%#6 of 11
Rapid7 InsightConnect0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Splunk SOAR

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid for tight budgets: Enterprise-heavy tools like Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, or FortiSOAR” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for Mid-Sized B2B: ... Splunk SOAR – Similarly heavy on licensing and complexity” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid being swayed by the largest enterprise platforms (Splunk SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · hard negative
“Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Splunk SOAR are top recommendations” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I recommend Splunk SOAR (formerly Phantom) as the top choice.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk SOAR if your SIEM is already based in Azure/Sentinel or Splunk Enterprise Security.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative

What the models said about Rapid7 InsightConnect

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“These platforms have received mixed-to-negative reviews from some users” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Rapid7 is more approachable but still requires significant tuning.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Rapid7 InsightConnect (Best Overall for Mid-Market)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Practical no-code automation and natural integration with Rapid7 products; specifically positioned for mid-market teams.” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative
“mentioned as options that provide a good balance of cost and functionality for small to mid-sized businesses” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
Tines vs Splunk SOARTines vs Rapid7 InsightConnectShuffle vs Splunk SOARShuffle vs Rapid7 InsightConnectSwimlane Turbine vs Splunk SOARSwimlane Turbine vs Rapid7 InsightConnectCortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOARCortex XSOAR vs Rapid7 InsightConnectManageEngine Log360 vs Splunk SOARManageEngine Log360 vs Rapid7 InsightConnectSplunk SOAR vs TorqTorq vs Rapid7 InsightConnectAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full SOAR standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.