AttackIQ Flex vs Infection Monkey
Zero of fourteen models named AttackIQ Flex first on the direct prompt; zero named Infection Monkey. AttackIQ Flex was named by eight of the fourteen models and Infection Monkey by nine and AttackIQ Flex carries 10 labels and Infection Monkey 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Infection Monkey
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the breach and attack simulation page.
By framing
AttackIQ FlexFirst choices, of fourteen modelsInfection MonkeyAcross every category in the November 2026 Edition, AttackIQ Flex and Infection Monkey were named in the same answer fifteen times, of the 35 answers naming AttackIQ Flex and the 39 naming Infection Monkey. In those answers Infection Monkey took the first choice three times and AttackIQ Flex five.
Every model, every framing
| Model | DirectIM | ParaphraseIM | ComparativeIM | Budget-constrainedIM | Scale-constrainedIM | NegativeIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | IM | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | IM | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | IM | |||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | IM | IM | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | IM | IM | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | IM | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | IM |
AttackIQ FlexIM Infection Monkey first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, AttackIQ Flex on the left and Infection Monkey on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
13 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
AttackIQ Flex18%#2 of 11AttackIQ Flex13%#3 of 13AttackIQ Flex2%#– of 8What the models said about AttackIQ Flex
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“The $0 tier is quite limited compared to paid options” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · soft negative
“The best breach and attack simulation platform for a company with a limited budget is AttackIQ Flex, as it is available for a published price starting at free.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“AttackIQ Flex is highlighted as a strong option for those needing real results quickly, with a starting price that begins at free” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“For a company with a limited budget, AttackIQ Flex is the best starting point.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Infection Monkey
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“it's generally less polished and more DIY than commercial platforms” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Infection Monkey is the easiest free option for hands-on breach simulation and lateral movement mapping.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Free for basic use; focuses on lateral movement, breach simulation, and self-propagation testing.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · alternative
“Cost: Free (GPL-3.0) ... Tests network segmentation and lateral movement” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.