2 categories · RankedAxio
Axio is a cyber risk quantification platform for enterprises · axio.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
FairCRQ is first at 35%.
CyberSaint CyberStrong is first at 13%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
SAFE Security is first at 48%.
Why models recommend it
“SAFE and Axio frequently lead in recent Forrester evaluations”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · first choice
“I'd lean toward Kovrr or Axio”Kimi K2 · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Scenario-based modeling with historical industry loss library, positioned around cyber insurance premium alignment.”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Comparative question · alternative
“Axio360 | Strong GRC integration; excellent board reporting; OT capabilities | Can be heavier implementation”Kimi K2 · Scale-constrained question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Avoid enterprise tools like SAFE Security, Axio, or Balbix if budget is tight”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Traditional, enterprise-grade CRQ platforms (e.g., Safe Security (SAFE One), Kovrr, Axio) - generally not recommended for B2B SMBs.”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
“Platforms like Kovrr and Axio have faced criticism in niche reviews for being overly focused on insurance market dynamics”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
“criticized for being out of reach for mid-market buyers”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Axio, over the 61 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 54 | 26 | Compare → | |
| 41 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 38 | 6 | Compare → | |
| 24 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 22 | 0 | View → | |
| 17 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 11 | 0 | View → | |
| 10 | 2 | View → | |
| 10 | 1 | View → | |
| 9 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Axio →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Axio's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- security and insurance leaders
- Free plan or trial
- Free Assessment
- Customers named
- MLS, Riverstone, CRI, Alpine Capital Bank
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 60 of the 61 answers that named Axio and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
202 of the 230 domain citations in answers naming Axio came from a third party's page. Twenty-eight were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 302 | 5 | 2026-09-14 | Cyber risk quant, PAM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 28 | 0 | 2026-06-12 | Cyber risk quant | |
| Report or ebook | 9 | undated | |||
| Case study | 7 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 3 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2025-09-18 | ||
| Comparison | 1 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-14Axio welcomes new strategic advisors blog
- 2026-08-12Air announcement blog
- 2026-08-12Put a price tag on ai risk blog
- 2026-08-11Say yes to ai why we built axio air blog
- 2026-07-22Axio unison risk advisors partnership blog
- 2026-06-12Webinar recap ciso d and o webinar or virtual event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page axio.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.