Index › IT › Security operations › API security › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition

API security platforms for enterprise buyers

Asked as “API security platform”, and as “API discovery and protection tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
44%
Clear leader
44Salt Security19Akamai API Security0442Crunch33others

44% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Salt Security (44%) replaces Akamai API Security (33% then, 19% now), 25 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Salt Security leads at 44%, replacing Akamai API Security, which led at 33% and stands at 19% now: 25 points clear, past the floor. The verdict moved from contested to clear leader.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Salt Security44%10%60endorsed leader▲+13Since October 2026: 31% → 44%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.31% → 44%
02Akamai API Security19%17%58accepted challenger▼−14Since October 2026: 33% → 19%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.33% → 19%
03Traceable API Security Platform4%13%39accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
0442Crunch4%8%26accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
05Wallarm API Security4%23%31accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
06Apigee Lab in the set4%35%20criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
07Imperva API Security2%7%29accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
08Cequence Unified API Protection2%10%31accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
09Radware API Security Service2%8%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
10Kong Gateway2%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Noname Security0%22%18accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
13F5 Distributed Cloud API Security0%21%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11Cloudflare API Shield0%18%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Apigee is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models two times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
T03
04
05
06
07
08
R09
10
11
N12
F13
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Salt Security44%
02Akamai API Security19%
03Traceable API Security Platform4%
0442Crunch4%
05Wallarm API Security4%
06Apigee4%
07Imperva API Security2%
08Cequence Unified API Protection2%
09Radware API Security Service2%
10Kong Gateway2%
11Cloudflare API Shield0%
12Noname Security0%
13F5 Distributed Cloud API Security0%

What they warned about

Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Akamai API Security
17%
10 of 58 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“Bundled WAF products that rely mainly on signatures and static rules... Imperva, Akamai, F5, Cloudflare, and comparable WAAP offerings may be strong choices when integrated into an existing stack, but verify whether the specific package detects BOLA” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Apigee
35%
7 of 20 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid for Predictability | Google Apigee | PAYG: $365/mo per environment + $20 per million calls” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Salt Security
10%
6 of 60 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“solid security product, but its Marketplace pricing is still request-volume based and can become expensive at higher volumes” GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt
Wallarm API Security
23%
7 of 31 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“it has a relatively high negative rate (11%) among enterprise recommendations, indicating some dissatisfaction or limitations in certain use cases” Mistral Small, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 938 links across 218 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 36 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Akamai35 answers · 78 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Zuplo30 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
30 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Radware26 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Check Point20 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 35 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Google18 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Checkmarx15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Wallarm14 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
12 answers · 19 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “api security platform”, “api security platforms”, “best api security platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsGoogle ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Salt Security salt.security44%1448801352,611214
Akamai parent site
Akamai API Security 19%
19%13327,1001,614
Traceable API Security Platform traceable.ai4%951,7933
42Crunch 42crunch.com4%9832043800
Wallarm API Security wallarm.com4%9250080,8700
Gravitee gravitee.io4%1251,0002710,592120
Tyk tyk.io4%2151,300427,9630
Apigee cloud.google.com4%3205,4003517,405,347
Imperva imperva.com
Imperva API Security 2%
2%593,600184417,309 company
Cequence Unified API Protection cequence.ai2%610950108

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (akamai.com, checkpoint.com, gartner.com, radware.com, salt.security). The first result for “api security platform” is opentext.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best API security platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which API discovery and protection tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade API security platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best API security platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a API security platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which API security platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Akamai API Security
Two alternativesImperva API Security, Salt Security
Salt SecurityChanged
Two alternativesTraceable API Security Platform, Wallarm API Security
Salt Security
Four alternatives42Crunch, Akamai API Security, Gravitee API Platform, Wallarm API Security
Postman, StackHawk
Two alternativesAkamai API Security, Wiz
against: Salt Security
no first choiceagainst: 42Crunch, Apigee, Noname Security, Postman
GPT-5.4 miniAkamai API Security
Four alternativesAkto, Cequence Unified API Protection, Salt Security, Traceable API Security Platform
Salt Security, Traceable API Security PlatformChanged
Three alternativesAkamai API Security, Cloudflare API Shield, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud API Security
Salt Security, Traceable API Security Platform, Wallarm API Security
Six alternativesAkamai API Security, Apigee, F5 WAAP / Application Delivery and Security Platform, Fastly, Imperva API Security, Microsoft Defender for APIs
Apigee, Wallarm API Securityagainst: Impart, Salt Securityno first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashSalt Security
Five alternatives42Crunch, Akamai API Security, Cequence Unified API Protection, Traceable API Security Platform, Wallarm API Security
Salt SecurityHeld
Two alternativesAkamai API Security, Traceable API Security Platform
Salt Security
Five alternatives42Crunch, Akamai API Security, Cequence Unified API Protection, Traceable API Security Platform, Wallarm API Security
Salt Security
Four alternatives42Crunch, Akamai API Security, StackHawk, Wallarm API Security
against: AWS WAF, Apigee
no first choicenothing named
Perplexity SonarSalt Security
Two alternativesAkamai API Security, Apigee
Salt SecurityHeld
Three alternativesAkamai API Security, Apigee, Traceable API Security Platform
Akamai API Security, Salt Security, Traceable API Security Platform
Nine alternatives42Crunch, APIsec, Cequence Unified API Protection, Cloudflare API Shield, Imperva API Security, Radware API Security Service, StackHawk, Upwind, Wiz
against: Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, Azure API Management, Kong Gateway
42Crunch
One alternativeSalt Security
against: Akamai API Security, Zuplo
no first choiceagainst: 42Crunch, Akamai API Security, Akto, Cloudflare API Shield, F5 Distributed Cloud API Security, Imperva API Security, SaltStack, StackHawk, Wallarm API Security
Grok 4.20Salt Security
Two alternativesAkamai API Security, Cloudflare Application Security and Performance
against: Orca Security, Postman
Salt SecurityHeld
Five alternativesAkamai API Security, Cequence Unified API Protection, Imperva API Security, Radware API Security Service, Traceable API Security Platform
Salt Security
Five alternativesAkamai API Security, Cequence Unified API Protection, Imperva API Security, Radware API Protection, Wallarm API Security
against: Apigee, Azure API Management, MuleSoft
Akamai API Security
Two alternativesImperva API Security, Salt Security
against: Cequence Unified API Protection, Traceable API Security Platform, Wallarm API Security
Salt Security
Six alternativesAkamai API Security, Cequence Unified API Protection, Check Point CloudGuard WAF, Cloudflare API Gateway, Imperva API Security, Wallarm API Security
against: AWS WAF, Akto, Apigee, Check Point CloudGuard WAF, Cloudflare API Shield, F5 Distributed Cloud API Security, Kong Gateway, Noname Security, Traceable API Security Platform, Wallarm API Security
Mistral SmallAkamai API Security, Salt Security
Three alternativesCequence Unified API Protection, Check Point CloudGuard WAF, Traceable API Security Platform
Salt SecurityChanged
Two alternativesTraceable API Security Platform, Wallarm API Security
Salt Security
Nine alternatives42Crunch, Akamai API Security, Apigee, Azure API Management, Checkmarx API Security, Noname Security, Radware API Security Service, StackHawk, Traceable API Security Platform
Salt Securityagainst: Akamai API Security, Wallarm API Securityno first choiceagainst: Cequence Unified API Protection, Traceable API Security Platform, Wallarm API Security
DeepSeek V4 FlashSalt Security
Four alternatives42Crunch, Akamai API Security, Cequence Unified API Protection, Traceable API Security Platform
Salt SecurityHeld
Two alternativesAkamai API Security, Traceable API Security Platform
no first choiceCequence Unified API Protection
Three alternativesAkamai API Security, Salt Security, Wallarm API Security
no first choiceagainst: Akamai API Security, Azure API Management, Citrix, Cloudflare API Shield, F5 Distributed Cloud API Security, Imperva API Security, Okta, Radware API Security Service, Salt Security, Thales, Traceable API Security Platform, Wallarm API Security
Llama 4 MaverickAkamai API Security
Three alternatives42Crunch, Cequence Unified API Protection, Salt Security
no first choiceChangedno first choice42Crunch, Akamai API Security, Salt SecurityZuplo for Enterprisenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashApigee, Kong Gateway
Three alternativesF5 Distributed Cloud API Security, Imperva API Security, WSO2 API Manager
Salt SecurityChanged
Four alternativesAkamai API Security, F5 Distributed Cloud API Security, Imperva API Security, Traceable API Security Platform
Noname Security
Four alternativesApimetrics, Axiom, Kong Protect, Salt Security
Levo.ai
One alternativeGravitee
against: Akamai API Security, Noname Security, Salt Security, Wallarm API Security
no first choicenothing named
Kimi K2Akamai API Security, Salt Security
Five alternatives42Crunch, Cequence Unified API Protection, Cloudflare API Shield, Imperva Application Security Platform, Traceable API Security Platform
Salt SecurityChanged
One alternativeAkamai API Security
Salt Security, Wallarm API Security
Four alternativesAkamai API Security, Cloudflare API Shield, Imperva API Security, Noname Security
KrakenD, Salt Security, Traceable API Security Platformagainst: Akamai API Security, Amazon API Gateway, Apigeeno first choicenothing named
GLM 4.7 FlashXAkamai API Security
Four alternativesCequence Unified API Protection, F5 Distributed Cloud API Security, Imperva API Security, Salt Security
Salt SecurityChanged
Three alternativesAkamai API Security, F5 API Security, Imperva API Security
Salt Security
Nine alternatives42Crunch API Security Platform, Akamai API Security, Apigee, Azure API Management, Cequence Unified API Protection, Imperva Application Security Platform, Kong Gateway, Radware API Security Service, Traceable API Security Platform
Gravitee
One alternativeTyk
against: Akamai API Security, Apigee
no first choicenothing named
MiniMax M2.5Akamai API Security, Salt Security
Two alternativesApigee, Imperva API Security
Radware API Security Service, Salt SecurityChanged
One alternativeAkto
no first choiceGravitee, Tyk
Two alternativesDetectify, Microsoft Security
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaAkamai API Security
Three alternatives42Crunch, Salt Security, Traceable API Security Platform
Akamai API SecurityHeld
One alternativeSalt Security
no first choiceWallarm API Securityno first choiceagainst: Akamai API Security, Akamai's former Neosec product
Muse Glimmer 30BImperva API Security, Salt Security
Eight alternatives42Crunch, Akamai API Security, Axway, Broadcom, Cequence Unified API Protection, Google Cloud, Kong Gateway, Noname Security
Salt SecurityChanged
Two alternativesAkamai API Security, formerly Noname Security, Traceable AI, now Harness API Security
Salt Security, Traceable API Security Platform
Four alternativesAkamai API Security, Cloudflare API Shield, Imperva API Security, Wallarm API Security
Tyk
One alternativeCloudflare API Shield
against: Akamai API Security, Cequence Unified API Protection, Salt Security, Traceable API Security Platform
no first choiceagainst: Akamai API Security, Noname Security, Salt Security
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:48yes159 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:17yes36 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 19:42yes1322 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:47yes106 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:32yes1013 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:36yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 18:46yes2246 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:20yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:38no027 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:59yes1079 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:29yes2247 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:04yes928 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 13:08yes514 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 19:02yes1315 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:42yes97 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:56yes57 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:43yes221 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:23yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:34yes910 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:50yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:25yes2331 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:08yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:01yes1539 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:35yes2036 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:02yes1932 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:06yes526 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:56yes215 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:03yes1523 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:36yes1310 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:27yes119 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:06yes1026 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 19:10yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:44yes1721 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 18:11yes811 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:28yes2214 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:14yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:07no034 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 17:34yes1840 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:09yes1321 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:55yes1029 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 18:25yes929 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:41yes2346 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:03yes168 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:58yes45 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:57yes1221 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 19:04yes104 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:57yes1213 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:48yes53 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:09yes2430 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:06yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:41yes1561 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:08yes2275 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:15yes2249 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:03yes833 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 13:45yes218 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 18:07yes1833 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:31yes1914 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:40yes38 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:06no020 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:51yes1010 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:45yes1017 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:07no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:11yes2561 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:41yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 13:01no030 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:23yes1435 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:06yes1926 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:37no014 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:48yes323 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:41yes1525 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:46yes198 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:45yes36 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 18:20yes925 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:31yes106 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:11yes1816 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:52yes54 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:54yes2440 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:46yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:37no031 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:51yes2435 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 17:43yes2333 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:50yes1645 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 17:51yes519 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:50yes2427 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Akamai read as Akamai API Security
Akamai (Noname Security) read as Akamai API Security
Akamai (formerly Noname Security) read as Akamai API Security
Cequence read as Cequence Unified API Protection
Cequence Security read as Cequence Unified API Protection
Check Point read as Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Check Point (CloudGuard) read as Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Check Point WAF read as Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Cloudflare read as Cloudflare API Shield
Cloudflare Enterprise read as Cloudflare API Shield
F5 read as F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
F5 (Advanced WAF / APIM) read as F5 Distributed Cloud API Security
Imperva read as Imperva API Security
Imperva (Application Cloud / SecureSphere) read as Imperva API Security
Kong read as Kong Gateway
Kong Enterprise read as Kong Gateway
Radware read as Radware API Security Service
Radware API Security read as Radware API Security Service
Traceable read as Traceable API Security Platform
Traceable AI read as Traceable API Security Platform
Traceable AI (now part of Harness) read as Traceable API Security Platform
Traceable.ai read as Traceable API Security Platform
Wallarm read as Wallarm API Security
Unresolved, counted raw
Akamai API Security, formerly Noname Security
Akamai's former Neosec product
Apimetrics
Barracuda Networks API Protection
Check Point WAF API Discovery
Cloudflare API Shield Discovery
Data Theorem API Secure
F5 API Security
F5 WAAP / Application Delivery and Security Platform
Guardrail
Harness API Discovery
Harness WAAP
Kong Protect (by Kong)
Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud API Security
Postman Pynt
Traceable AI, now Harness API Security
Wallarm API Discovery
Zuplo for Enterprise
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← AI SOC agentsASM →