Security awareness training for enterprise buyers
Asked as “security awareness training platform”, and as “phishing simulation and training tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
79%
Clear leader
79KnowBe415Hoxhunt04Proofpoint ZenGuide02others
79% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+5Since October 2026: 74% → 79%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.KnowBe4 held the lead, +5 points on 74%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
KnowBe423%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 20% → 23%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketKnowBe456%Clear leader▲+11Since October 2026: 45% → 56%, +11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterpriseKnowBe479%Clear leader▲+5Since October 2026: 74% → 79%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
KnowBe423%Contested▲+3Since October 2026: 20% → 23%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketKnowBe456%Clear leader▲+11Since October 2026: 45% → 56%, +11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterpriseKnowBe479%Clear leader▲+5Since October 2026: 74% → 79%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01KnowBe479%13%75endorsed leader▲+5Since October 2026: 74% → 79%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.74% → 79%
KnowBe479%13%75endorsed leader▲+5Since October 2026: 74% → 79%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.74% → 79%02
Hoxhunt15%10%60accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 14% → 15%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.14% → 15%
Hoxhunt15%10%60accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 14% → 15%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.14% → 15%03
Proofpoint ZenGuide4%15%68accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
Proofpoint ZenGuide4%15%68accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%Show the nine products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training0%36%11criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
06
Mimecast Engage0%17%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Mimecast Engage0%17%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Infosec IQ0%12%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Infosec IQ0%12%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%05
Cofense PhishMe0%12%26accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Cofense PhishMe0%12%26accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
NINJIO0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
NINJIO0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
SANS Security Awareness0%7%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
SANS Security Awareness0%7%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%04
SoSafe0%0%25accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
SoSafe0%0%25accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%08
MetaCompliance0%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
MetaCompliance0%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
KnowBe4 vs Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation TrainingWizer vs HoxhuntWizer vs NINJIOWizer vs Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation TrainingHoxhunt vs NINJIOHoxhunt vs Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation TrainingNINJIO vs Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training
One product takes 79% of first choices here, so the chart would put eleven markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. One product carries a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
KnowBe413%
10 of 75 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“KnowBe4 ... Persistent phishing issues ... Outdated content” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Proofpoint ZenGuide15%
10 of 68 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Proofpoint Security Awareness Training ... Microsoft integration problems” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Hoxhunt10%
6 of 60 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Platforms with Significant Concerns ... Hoxhunt ... Clunky phishing simulations” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Cofense PhishMe12%
3 of 26 labels negative · 3 of 14 models
“it may not be the best fit for organizations that need a more comprehensive security awareness training platform” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 934 links across 210 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 23 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Hoxhunt41 answers · 68 citations · 14 models
vendor site · KnowBe440 answers · 77 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Threatcop31 answers · 43 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G228 answers · 52 citations · 12 models
19 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
vendor site · RansomLeak19 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Proofpoint18 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Cyber Aware17 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
14 answers · 14 citations · 7 models
12 answers · 16 citations · 5 models
vendor site · Guideflow12 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
19 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 5 models
12 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best security awareness training platform”, “security awareness training platform”, “security awareness training platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KnowBe4 knowbe4.com | 79% | 235 | 74,000 | 1,009 | 156,597 | 21 | 5 |
| Hoxhunt hoxhunt.com | 15% | 130 | 2,900 | 31 | 5,772 | 23 | |
| Proofpoint parent site Proofpoint ZenGuide 4% | 4% | 126 | 27,100 | 1,488 | |||
| DefendWise defendwise.com | 2% | 2 | |||||
| SoSafe sosafe-awareness.com | 0% | 54 | 320 | 7 | 11,234 | ||
| Cofense PhishMe cofense.com | 0% | 38 | 110 | 2 | 41,392 | 22 | |
| Mimecast mimecast.com Mimecast Engage 0% | 0% | 52 | 90 | 0 | 148,929 company | 21 | |
| SANS Security Awareness sans.org | 0% | 31 | 90 | 4 | 703,543 | 81 | |
| MetaCompliance metacompliance.com | 0% | 29 | 260 | 2 | 2,656 | ||
| Infosec IQ infosecinstitute.com | 0% | 43 | 590 | 17 | 55,091 | 111 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, knowbe4.com, proofpoint.com). The first result for “best security awareness training platform” is proofpoint.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best security awareness training platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which phishing simulation and training tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade security awareness training platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best security awareness training platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a security awareness training platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which security awareness training platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Hoxhunt, KnowBe4KnowBe4ChangedKnowBe4KnowBe4no first choiceagainst: Jericho Security, usecure
One alternative
Proofpoint ZenGuideTwo alternatives
Hoxhunt, Proofpoint ZenGuideFour alternatives
Hoxhunt, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SoSafeTwo alternatives
ESET Cybersecurity Awareness Training, Proofpoint ZenGuideGPT-5.4 miniKnowBe4KnowBe4HeldKnowBe4KnowBe4no first choiceagainst: Infosec IQ
Four alternatives
Hoxhunt, Mimecast Engage, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SoSafeTwo alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training, Proofpoint ZenGuideSeven alternatives
Check Point SmartAwareness, Cofense PhishMe, Hoxhunt, Mimecast Engage, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SoSafe, usecureGemini 3.5 FlashKnowBe4KnowBe4HeldKnowBe4KnowBe4no first choiceagainst: Cornerstone, GoPhish, KnowBe4, Mimecast Engage, NINJIO, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SANS Security Awareness, Workday
Four alternatives
Hoxhunt, NINJIO, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SoSafeThree alternatives
Hoxhunt, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training, Proofpoint ZenGuideSix alternatives
CybSafe, Hoxhunt, Living Security, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SoSafeFour alternatives
Hoxhunt, MetaCompliance, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SANS Security AwarenessPerplexity SonarKnowBe4KnowBe4HeldKnowBe4KnowBe4against: Hoxhuntno first choiceagainst: Hoxhunt, KnowBe4, Proofpoint ZenGuide
Six alternatives
Hoxhunt, Infosec IQ, MetaCompliance, Phished, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SoSafeThree alternatives
Cofense PhishMe, Hoxhunt, Proofpoint ZenGuideSeven alternatives
Adaptive Security, Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness, Cofense PhishMe, Hoxhunt, Mimecast Engage, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SoSafeOne alternative
Proofpoint ZenGuideGrok 4.20KnowBe4against: PhishedKnowBe4Heldagainst: Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation TrainingHoxhunt, KnowBe4KnowBe4against: Cofense PhishMe, CybSafe, Hoxhunt, Mimecast EngageHoxhunt, KnowBe4against: Adaptive Security, CybeReady, CyberHoot, Defendify, ESET Cybersecurity Awareness Training, Infosec IQ, Mimecast Engage, Phished
Three alternatives
Hoxhunt, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SoSafeThree alternatives
Cofense PhishMe, Hoxhunt, Proofpoint ZenGuideFive alternatives
Cofense PhishMe, Infosec IQ, Keepnet, Mimecast Engage, Proofpoint ZenGuideOne alternative
Proofpoint ZenGuideThree alternatives
Mimecast Engage, NINJIO, Proofpoint ZenGuideMistral SmallKnowBe4, Proofpoint ZenGuideKnowBe4ChangedKnowBe4KnowBe4no first choiceagainst: Cofense PhishMe, KnowBe4, Mimecast Engage, Proofpoint ZenGuide
Six alternatives
Cofense PhishMe, Hoxhunt, Living Security, Mimecast Engage, SANS Security Awareness, Threatcop TLMSTwo alternatives
Hoxhunt, Proofpoint ZenGuideThree alternatives
Infosec IQ, MetaCompliance, Proofpoint ZenGuideDeepSeek V4 FlashKnowBe4KnowBe4HeldKnowBe4KnowBe4Hoxhunt, KnowBe4against: Cornerstone, KnowBe4, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SAP, Workday
Two alternatives
Hoxhunt, Proofpoint ZenGuideThree alternatives
Cofense PhishMe, Hoxhunt, Proofpoint ZenGuideFour alternatives
Hoxhunt, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SoSafe, ThreatcopOne alternative
Proofpoint ZenGuideTwo alternatives
Proofpoint ZenGuide, SoSafeLlama 4 MaverickKnowBe4KnowBe4Heldno first choiceKnowBe4no first choiceagainst: Cofense PhishMe, Hoxhunt, KnowBe4, Proofpoint ZenGuide
Three alternatives
Hoxhunt, Mimecast Engage, Proofpoint ZenGuideThree alternatives
Hoxhunt, PhishingBox, Proofpoint ZenGuideThree alternatives
Hoxhunt, Infosec IQ, Proofpoint ZenGuideQwen 3.7 FlashKnowBe4KnowBe4HeldKnowBe4KnowBe4no first choiceagainst: Cisco Secure Email, KnowBe4, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SANS Awareness
Two alternatives
Cofense PhishMe, Proofpoint ZenGuideTwo alternatives
Cofense PhishMe, Proofpoint ZenGuideFive alternatives
Cofense PhishMe, Hoxhunt, MetaCompliance, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SoSafeThree alternatives
Cofense PhishMe, Hoxhunt, Proofpoint ZenGuideKimi K2Hoxhunt, KnowBe4KnowBe4ChangedKnowBe4KnowBe4KnowBe4against: KnowBe4, Proofpoint ZenGuide
Three alternatives
Cofense PhishMe, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SANS Security AwarenessFour alternatives
Cofense PhishMe, Hoxhunt, Mimecast Engage, Proofpoint ZenGuideSix alternatives
Cofense PhishMe, Hoxhunt, Infosec IQ, Mimecast Engage, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SANS Security AwarenessTwo alternatives
Proofpoint ZenGuide, SANS Security AwarenessFour alternatives
CybSafe, Hoxhunt, MetaCompliance, Proofpoint ZenGuideGLM 4.7 FlashXHoxhunt, KnowBe4HoxhuntChangedHoxhunt, KnowBe4DefendWiseno first choiceagainst: Goldphish, Hoxhunt, KnowBe4, Proofpoint ZenGuide
Two alternatives
Infosec IQ, Proofpoint ZenGuideThree alternatives
Cofense PhishMe, KnowBe4, Proofpoint ZenGuideSix alternatives
Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness, Infosec IQ, MetaCompliance, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SANS Security Awareness, SoSafeThree alternatives
Huntress Managed Security Awareness Training, KnowBe4, Proofpoint ZenGuideMiniMax M2.5KnowBe4KnowBe4, Proofpoint ZenGuideChangedKnowBe4KnowBe4no first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Hoxhunt, SoSafeOne alternative
HoxhuntFive alternatives
Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness, Hoxhunt, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SANS Security Awareness, SoSafeThree alternatives
DefendWise, Keepnet Extended Human Risk Management, Proofpoint ZenGuideSix alternatives
Cofense PhishMe, Emtrain, Hook Security, Hoxhunt, KnowBe4, RansomLeakGPT-6 LunaHoxhuntKnowBe4ChangedKnowBe4KnowBe4against: Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Trainingno first choiceagainst: KnowBe4, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training, Proofpoint ZenGuide
Two alternatives
KnowBe4, Proofpoint ZenGuideTwo alternatives
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training, Proofpoint ZenGuideSix alternatives
Cofense PhishMe, Hoxhunt, Living Security, Mimecast Engage, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SANS Security AwarenessOne alternative
Huntress Managed Security Awareness TrainingMuse Glimmer 30BKnowBe4Hoxhunt, KnowBe4ChangedKnowBe4KnowBe4against: Hoxhuntno first choiceagainst: KnowBe4, Proofpoint ZenGuide
Five alternatives
Cofense PhishMe, Hoxhunt, Mimecast Engage, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SoSafeOne alternative
Proofpoint ZenGuideSix alternatives
Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness, Hoxhunt, Huntress Managed Security Awareness Training, Noon Security, Proofpoint's ZenGuide, SoSafeBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:51 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:30 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:27 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:07 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:55 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:56 | yes | 18 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:28 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:51 | yes | 9 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:38 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:35 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:45 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:51 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:45 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:23 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:38 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:59 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:29 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 25 | 108 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:12 | yes | 12 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:37 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:31 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:13 | yes | 12 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:14 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:07 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 25 | 16 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:18 | yes | 23 | 50 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:30 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:08 | yes | 25 | 47 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:36 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:31 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:51 | yes | 7 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:10 | yes | 14 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:29 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:33 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:38 | yes | 20 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 22 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:31 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:02 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:55 | yes | 23 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:38 | yes | 22 | 174 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 7 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:24 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:50 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:10 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:07 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:54 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:59 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:13 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:42 | yes | 24 | 48 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:09 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:11 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:52 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 18 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:47 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:41 | yes | 11 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 17 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:58 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:41 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:35 | yes | 15 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:47 | yes | 24 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:02 | yes | 25 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:36 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:05 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 24 | 89 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 4 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:17 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Arctic Wolf read as Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness
Cofense read as Cofense PhishMe
Cofense (Awareness/PhishMe) read as Cofense PhishMe
Cofense (PhishMe) read as Cofense PhishMe
Cofense (formerly PhishMe) read as Cofense PhishMe
ESET read as ESET Cybersecurity Awareness Training
Huntress read as Huntress Managed Security Awareness Training
Microsoft Attack Simulation Training read as Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training
Microsoft Attack Simulation Training (Defender for O365) read as Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training
Microsoft Attack Simulation Training (Defender for Office 365) read as Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training
Microsoft Defender read as Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 (Attack Simulation Training) read as Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training
Microsoft's Attack Simulation Training read as Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training
Mimecast read as Mimecast Engage
Proofpoint read as Proofpoint ZenGuide
Proofpoint (PSAT) read as Proofpoint ZenGuide
Proofpoint (Security Awareness Training) read as Proofpoint ZenGuide
Proofpoint (ZenGuide / Security Awareness Training) read as Proofpoint ZenGuide
Proofpoint (ZenGuide) read as Proofpoint ZenGuide
Proofpoint (formerly Wombat) read as Proofpoint ZenGuide
SANS read as SANS Security Awareness
SANS Security Awareness Training read as SANS Security Awareness
Unresolved, counted raw
Awarity
Check Point SmartAwareness
Emtrain
Hacker Rangers
Hornetsecurity Security Awareness Service
Jericho Security
Keepnet Extended Human Risk Management
Right-Hand
SANS Awareness
Threatcop TLMS
Wyzecam (via ViaTrust)
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.