Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › IT › Security operations › Awareness training › Wizer vs NINJIO
Security awareness training · November 2026 Edition

Wizer vs NINJIO

Zero of fourteen models named Wizer first on the direct prompt; zero named NINJIO. Wizer was named by ten of the fourteen models and NINJIO by nine and Wizer carries 12 labels and NINJIO 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Wizer

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

NINJIO

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share11%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels1218A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Wizer reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.KnowBe4 was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. KnowBe4 vs Wizer · KnowBe4 vs NINJIO · Wizer vs Hoxhunt

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the security awareness training page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
WizerFirst choices, of fourteen modelsNINJIO
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained61
Scale-constrained00
Negative10
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Wizer and NINJIO stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Wizer NINJIO first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Wizer on the left and NINJIO on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Wizer and NINJIO stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashKnowBe4 alternatives: Hoxhunt, Huntress Managed Security Awareness Training, NINJIO, SoSafe
Mistral SmallHoxhunt, KnowBe4 alternatives: NINJIO
DeepSeek V4 FlashKnowBe4 alternatives: Hoxhunt, Huntress Managed Security Awareness Training, NINJIO, Wizer

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5KnowBe4 alternatives: Infosec IQ, Proofpoint ZenGuide
GPT-5.4 miniKnowBe4 alternatives: Hoxhunt, Mimecast Engage, Proofpoint ZenGuide
Perplexity SonarKnowBe4 alternatives: Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness, Hoxhunt
Grok 4.20KnowBe4 alternatives: Hoxhunt, SoSafe
Llama 4 MaverickRansomLeak alternatives: Hoxhunt, KnowBe4, Phished, SoSafe
Qwen 3.7 FlashHoxhunt, KnowBe4 alternatives: MetaCompliance, RansomLeak
Kimi K2KnowBe4 alternatives: Hoxhunt, Infosec IQ, Proofpoint ZenGuide, SoSafe
GLM 4.7 FlashXHoxhunt, KnowBe4 alternatives: MetaCompliance, SoSafe
MiniMax M2.5KnowBe4 alternatives: Hoxhunt, SoSafe
GPT-6 LunaKnowBe4 alternatives: Hoxhunt, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation Training, ZenGuide
Muse Glimmer 30BKnowBe4 alternatives: Hoxhunt, SoSafe

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Wizer leads by thirteen points.
Wizer13%#4 of 11
NINJIO0%#10 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Wizer leads by nine points.
Wizer11%#2 of 14
NINJIO2%#4 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Wizer0%#– of 12
NINJIO0%#11 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Wizer

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Start with CanIPhish (free up to 10 users) or Wizer (free basic training) to test engagement” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Hoxhunt and Wizer are often praised for gamified, engaging, and behavior-based training” Mistral Small · negative prompt · first choice
“Wizer is the best starting point if its free tier meets your needs” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about NINJIO

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“The Absolute Cheapest Option: Ninjio ... If you need high volume for low cost: Choose Ninjio.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose NINJIO if: Your team experiences content fatigue and you need highly engaging, story-driven content” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
“If you need a more tailored or story-driven approach, NINJIO is also a strong option.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared
KnowBe4 vs WizerKnowBe4 vs NINJIOWizer vs HoxhuntWizer vs Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation TrainingHoxhunt vs NINJIONINJIO vs Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Attack Simulation TrainingAll ten head-to-head pages and the full awareness training standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.