Deception technology for enterprise buyers
Asked as “deception technology platform”, and as “honeypot and decoy tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 46 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
61%
Clear leader
61Acalvio ShadowPlex22Thinkst Canary04Zscaler Deception13others
61% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+14Since October 2026: 47% → 61%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Acalvio ShadowPlex held the lead, +14 points on 47%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Thinkst Canary53%Clear leader▲+23Since October 2026: 30% → 53%, +23 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketThinkst Canary56%Clear leader▲+20Since October 2026: 36% → 56%, +20 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Enterprise
Acalvio ShadowPlex61%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 47% → 61%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This page
Thinkst Canary53%Clear leader▲+23Since October 2026: 30% → 53%, +23 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →Mid-marketThinkst Canary56%Clear leader▲+20Since October 2026: 36% → 56%, +20 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterpriseAcalvio ShadowPlex61%Clear leader▲+14Since October 2026: 47% → 61%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Acalvio ShadowPlex61%4%57endorsed leader▲+14Since October 2026: 47% → 61%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.47% → 61%
Acalvio ShadowPlex61%4%57endorsed leader▲+14Since October 2026: 47% → 61%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.47% → 61%02Thinkst Canary22%13%39accepted challenger▲+12Since October 2026: 10% → 22%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.10% → 22%
Thinkst Canary22%13%39accepted challenger▲+12Since October 2026: 10% → 22%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.10% → 22%03
Zscaler Deception4%10%41accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%
Zscaler Deception4%10%41accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%04CounterCraft2%18%28accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
05Attivo Networks2%30%10criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
06Illusive2%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13Illusive Networks0%41%17criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
12
Proofpoint Shadow0%31%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Proofpoint Shadow0%31%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Fidelis Deception0%25%12criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Fidelis Deception0%25%12criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%09Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception0%20%20accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
08
Fortinet FortiDeceptor0%17%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Fortinet FortiDeceptor0%17%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07FortiDeceptor0%16%19accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10
Rapid7 Incident Command0%15%13accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 0%
Rapid7 Incident Command0%15%13accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Thinkst Canary vs Acalvio ShadowPlexThinkst Canary vs TracebitThinkst Canary vs CounterCraftThinkst Canary vs Fidelis DeceptionCanarytokens vs OpenCanaryCanarytokens vs HoneyWireCanarytokens vs Acalvio ShadowPlexCanarytokens vs TracebitCanarytokens vs CounterCraftCanarytokens vs Fidelis DeceptionOpenCanary vs HoneyWireOpenCanary vs Acalvio ShadowPlexOpenCanary vs TracebitOpenCanary vs CounterCraftOpenCanary vs Fidelis DeceptionHoneyWire vs Acalvio ShadowPlexHoneyWire vs TracebitHoneyWire vs CounterCraftHoneyWire vs Fidelis DeceptionAcalvio ShadowPlex vs TracebitAcalvio ShadowPlex vs CounterCraftAcalvio ShadowPlex vs Fidelis DeceptionTracebit vs CounterCraftTracebit vs Fidelis DeceptionCounterCraft vs Fidelis Deception
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203C04
A05
I06
F07
08R09
101112I13
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative80%
Key
01Acalvio ShadowPlex61%
Acalvio ShadowPlex61%02Thinkst Canary22%
Thinkst Canary22%03Zscaler Deception4%
Zscaler Deception4%04CounterCraft2%
05Attivo Networks2%
06Illusive2%
07FortiDeceptor0%
08Fortinet FortiDeceptor0%
Fortinet FortiDeceptor0%09Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception0%
10Rapid7 Incident Command0%
Rapid7 Incident Command0%11Fidelis Deception0%
Fidelis Deception0%12Proofpoint Shadow0%
Proofpoint Shadow0%13Illusive Networks0%
What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Illusive Networks
41%
7 of 17 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“"Pure network-wide standalone deception from Illusive is essentially sunsetted" — the product has been absorbed into Proofpoint's identity threat protection line” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Cowrie
71%
5 of 7 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“generic open-source/low-interaction honey pots like Cowrie/Honeyd: These often lack automation” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Proofpoint Shadow31%
4 of 13 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid classic per-identity/per-user deception such as Proofpoint Deceptions Everywhere / Illusive Networks where total cost grows linearly with headcount.” Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt
CounterCraft
18%
5 of 28 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“High entry cost ($200,000/year minimum) and quote-based pricing” MiniMax M2.5, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 911 links across 211 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 79 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Acalvio44 answers · 100 citations · 12 models
42 answers · 42 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Zscaler34 answers · 52 citations · 11 models
32 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
publisher (Gane)30 answers · 33 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Guideflow26 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 23 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Fidelis Security18 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
vendor site · LinkedIn15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G212 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
42 answers · 11 models
32 answers · 11 models
30 answers · 9 models
25 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best deception technology platform”, “deception technology platform”, “deception technology platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acalvio ShadowPlex acalvio.com | 61% | 131 | 20 | 1 | 2,358 | 3 | 3 |
| Thinkst Canary thinkst.com | 22% | 131 | 590 | 8 | 189 | ||
| Zscaler parent site Zscaler Deception 4% | 4% | 75 | 60,500 | 3,104 | |||
| CounterCraft | 2% | 590 | 0 | ||||
| Attivo Networks | 2% | 90 | 1 | ||||
| Illusive | 2% | 12,100 | 43,717 | ||||
| Rapid7 parent site Rapid7, Inc. 2%, Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception 0%, Rapid7 Incident Command 0% | 2% | 57 | 14,800 | 798 | |||
| SentinelOne parent site SentinelOne Attivo 2% | 2% | 4 | 33,100 | 1,675 | |||
| Smokescreen Technologies | 2% | 10 | 0 | ||||
| FortiDeceptor | 0% | 140 | 3 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (acalvio.com, countercraftsec.com, fidelissecurity.com, g2.com, linkedin.com, zscaler.com). The first result for “best deception technology platform” is cybertrap.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best deception technology platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which honeypot and decoy tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade deception technology platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best deception technology platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a deception technology platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which deception technology platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Acalvio ShadowPlexAcalvio ShadowPlexHeldAcalvio ShadowPlex, IllusiveAcalvio ShadowPlexno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
FortiDeceptor, Illusive, SmokescreenThree alternatives
FortiDeceptor, SecurityHive, Thinkst CanaryFive alternatives
Attivo Networks, Fidelis Deception, FortiDeceptor, Smokescreen, Zscaler DeceptionGPT-5.4 miniAcalvio ShadowPlexThinkst CanaryChangedFortiDeceptoragainst: Attivo Networks, BOTsink, TrapXThinkst Canaryagainst: Deception360, Deceptive Bytes Platformno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Labyrinth, Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception, Thinkst CanaryThree alternatives
Fortra Digital Risk Protection, Smokescreen, Zscaler DeceptionFive alternatives
Deception360, Deceptive Bytes Platform, Labyrinth Deception Platform, Smokescreen, Zscaler DeceptionTwo alternatives
Labyrinth Deception Platform, Zscaler DeceptionGemini 3.5 FlashAcalvio ShadowPlexThinkst CanaryChangedSentinelOne Singularity HologramThinkst Canaryagainst: Proofpoint Identity Threat Defense, SentinelOne Singularity Hologramno first choiceagainst: Attivo Networks, Cowrie, Dionaea, Fidelis Deception, Honeyd, Illusive Networks, Modern Honey Network - MHN, TrapX Security
Five alternatives
CounterCraft, SentinelOne Singularity Identity, Thinkst Canary, Tracebit, Zscaler DeceptionThree alternatives
Acalvio ShadowPlex, SentinelOne Singularity Identity, Zscaler DeceptionFive alternatives
Acalvio ShadowPlex, CounterCraft Cyber Deception Platform, Fortinet FortiDeceptor, Proofpoint Shadow, Zscaler DeceptionTwo alternatives
Acalvio ShadowPlex, Fortinet FortiDeceptorPerplexity SonarAcalvio ShadowPlexAcalvio ShadowPlexHeldagainst: Cowrie, OpenCanaryAcalvio ShadowPlexAcalvio ShadowPlexagainst: CounterCraftno first choiceagainst: CounterCraft, FortiDeceptor, SentinelOne’s Attivo-derived capability, Tracebit, Zscaler’s Smokescreen-derived capability
Six alternatives
CounterCraft, Fidelis Deception, FortiDeceptor, Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception, Thinkst Canary, Zscaler DeceptionTwo alternatives
Thinkst Canary, Zscaler DeceptionSeven alternatives
CounterCraft, Fidelis Deception, Fortinet FortiDeceptor, SentinelOne's Attivo technology, Smokescreen, Thinkst Canary, Zscaler DeceptionTwo alternatives
FortiDeceptor, Thinkst CanaryGrok 4.20Acalvio ShadowPlexThinkst CanaryChangedagainst: Canarytokens, OpenCanary, T-PotAcalvio ShadowPlexagainst: Cowrie, Honeyd, T-PotThinkst Canaryagainst: Attivo, CounterCraft, Fidelis Deception, Fortinet FortiDeceptor, Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception, Zscaler Deceptionno first choiceagainst: Acalvio ShadowPlex, Allure Security, Cowrie, Honeyd, Illusive Networks, Proofpoint Shadow, Rapid7 Incident Command, SentinelOne Singularity Hologram, TrapX
Five alternatives
Fidelis Deception, Illusive Networks, Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception, SentinelOne Singularity, TrapXThree alternatives
Acalvio ShadowPlex, Attivo Networks, TrapX DeceptionGridFour alternatives
Attivo Networks, Illusive Networks, Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception, Thinkst CanaryOne alternative
Acalvio ShadowPlexMistral SmallAcalvio ShadowPlexThinkst CanaryChangedAcalvio ShadowPlex, Attivo NetworksAcalvio ShadowPlexagainst: Illusive, Rapid7 InsightIDR Deceptionno first choiceagainst: Illusive Networks
Three alternatives
Rapid7 Incident Command, Thinkst Canary, Zscaler DeceptionThree alternatives
Cymmetria MazeRunner, Illusive Networks, TrapX DeceptionGridFour alternatives
Fidelis Deception, Guardicore, Illusive Networks, TrapX SecurityOne alternative
Thinkst CanaryDeepSeek V4 FlashAcalvio ShadowPlexAcalvio ShadowPlexHeldAcalvio ShadowPlexagainst: Thinkst CanaryAcalvio ShadowPlexAcalvio ShadowPlexagainst: Thinkst Canarynothing named
Four alternatives
CounterCraft, Fortinet FortiDeceptor, Thinkst Canary, Zscaler DeceptionTwo alternatives
Attivo Networks ThreatDefend, Thinkst CanaryThree alternatives
CounterCraft, SentinelOne Singularity Hologram, TrapX DeceptionGridOne alternative
Attivo NetworksThree alternatives
CounterCraft, Fortinet FortiDeceptor, Zscaler DeceptionLlama 4 MaverickAcalvio ShadowPlexAcalvio ShadowPlexHeldAcalvio ShadowPlexIllusiveno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Attivo Networks ThreatDefend, Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception, Thinkst CanaryTwo alternatives
Attivo Networks ThreatDefend, Thinkst CanaryOne alternative
Thinkst CanaryFour alternatives
Acalvio 360 Deception, CounterCraft, Rapid7 Incident Command, Zscaler DeceptionQwen 3.7 FlashAttivo NetworksAcalvio ShadowPlexChangedagainst: Canarytokens, Cowrie, Dionaea, Honeyd, OpenCanary, T-PotCounterCraftAcalvio ShadowPlexagainst: Attivo Networks, Thinkst Canaryno first choiceagainst: Commvault ThreatWise, Fortinet FortiDeceptor, Proofpoint Shadow, Rapid7 Incident Command, Zscaler Deception
Two alternatives
Illusive Networks, ThreatisleTwo alternatives
Attivo Networks ThreatDefend, Proofpoint ShadowFour alternatives
Fortinet FortiDeceptor, Proofpoint Shadow, Rapid7 Incident Command, Zscaler DeceptionOne alternative
Rapid7 Incident CommandKimi K2Acalvio ShadowPlexAcalvio ShadowPlexHeldagainst: Attivo, Illusive Networks, Thinkst Canaryno first choiceAcalvio ShadowPlexno first choiceagainst: Acalvio ShadowPlex, CounterCraft, Fidelis Deception, Illusive Networks, Smokescreen, TrapX
Four alternatives
Fortinet FortiDeceptor, Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception, SentinelOne Singularity Hologram, Zscaler DeceptionOne alternative
Zscaler DeceptionThree alternatives
Proofpoint Shadow, Rapid7 Incident Command, SentinelOne SingularityGLM 4.7 FlashXAcalvio ShadowPlexThinkst CanaryChangedAcalvio ShadowPlexCounterCraftno first choiceagainst: CRM Honeypots, FortiDeceptor, Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception, Tracebit
Four alternatives
CounterCraft, FortiDeceptor, Rapid7 Incident Command, Zscaler DeceptionThree alternatives
Acalvio ShadowPlex, FortiDeceptor, Zscaler DeceptionSix alternatives
CounterCraft, FortiDeceptor, Proofpoint Shadow, Rapid7 Incident Command, SentinelOne Singularity Identity, Zscaler DeceptionOne alternative
Acalvio ShadowPlexMiniMax M2.5Acalvio ShadowPlexAcalvio ShadowPlex, SentinelOne AttivoChangedagainst: OpenCanary, T-PotAcalvio ShadowPlex, CounterCraft Cyber Deception PlatformAcalvio ShadowPlexagainst: CounterCraft, Illusive Networks, Proofpoint Shadow, Zscaler Deceptionno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception, Zscaler DeceptionTwo alternatives
Illusive Networks, Thinkst CanarySix alternatives
Fortinet FortiDeceptor, Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception, SentinelOne Singularity, Thinkst Applied Research, Tracebit, Zscaler DeceptionTwo alternatives
FortiDeceptor, Rapid7 Incident CommandGPT-6 LunaAcalvio ShadowPlexThinkst CanaryChangedAcalvio ShadowPlex, Fidelis DeceptionZscaler Deceptionagainst: Thinkst Canaryno first choiceagainst: Attivo, FortiDeceptor, Illusive, SentinelOne Singularity, Smokescreen
Three alternatives
FortiDeceptor, Thinkst Canary, Zscaler DeceptionOne alternative
Acalvio ShadowPlexFive alternatives
CounterCraft The Platform, Fortinet FortiDeceptor, Proofpoint Identity Threat Defense, Thinkst Canary, Zscaler DeceptionOne alternative
Acalvio ShadowPlexMuse Glimmer 30BRapid7, Inc., Smokescreen Technologies, Zscaler DeceptionAcalvio ShadowPlexChangedAttivo Networks, now SentinelOne Deception / ThreatDeception, Illusive NetworksThinkst Canaryagainst: Illusive Networks, Proofpoint Shadowno first choiceagainst: Akamai Guardicore, Broadcom Symantec Endpoint Protection, Forescout Continuum, Fortinet FortiDeceptor, Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception, SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint, TrapX Security, Zscaler Deception
Six alternatives
Attivo Networks, Inc., CounterCraft, FortiDeceptor, Illusive Networks, Labyrinth, TracebitTwo alternatives
Attivo Networks ThreatDefend, Thinkst CanaryFive alternatives
Acalvio ShadowPlex, CounterCraft, Cymmetria, Fortinet – FortiDeceptor, Guardicore, now Akamai GuardicoreOne alternative
CounterCraftBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:21 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:01 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:32 | yes | 7 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:09 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:01 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:41 | yes | 20 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:03 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:15 | yes | 14 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:06 | yes | 23 | 158 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:32 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:45 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:37 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:27 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:31 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:37 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:18 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:15 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:39 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:36 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:08 | yes | 10 | 49 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:24 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:22 | yes | 15 | 135 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:52 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:40 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:08 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 16 | 12 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 7 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 8 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:02 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:24 | yes | 9 | 66 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:07 | yes | 8 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:13 | yes | 23 | 88 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 9 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 22 | 49 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 8 | 59 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 8 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 22 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 16 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:07 | yes | 1 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:48 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:32 | yes | 14 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 23 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:15 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 19:25 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:33 | yes | 22 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 19 | 96 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:09 | yes | 3 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:12 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:34 | yes | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:20 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:21 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:33 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:18 | yes | 25 | 50 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:56 | yes | 5 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:40 | yes | 23 | 62 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:01 | yes | 21 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:09 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:34 | yes | 4 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:52 | yes | 14 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:09 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:43 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:24 | yes | 11 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 19:15 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:09 | yes | 10 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 23 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:06 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 12 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:56 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 18 | 102 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:38 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:43 | yes | 3 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 19 | 37 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acalvio read as Acalvio ShadowPlex
Acalvio (ShadowPlex) read as Acalvio ShadowPlex
Acalvio Technologies read as Acalvio ShadowPlex
Acalvio Technologies (ShadowPlex) read as Acalvio ShadowPlex
Acalvio Technologies – ShadowPlex read as Acalvio ShadowPlex
Akamai read as Akamai Guardicore
Fidelis read as Fidelis Deception
Fidelis Cybersecurity read as Fidelis Deception
Fidelis Security (Fidelis Deception) read as Fidelis Deception
Fortinet read as Fortinet FortiDeceptor
Fortinet (FortiDeceptor) read as Fortinet FortiDeceptor
Proofpoint read as Proofpoint Shadow
Proofpoint (Powered by Illusive Networks) read as Proofpoint Shadow
RapID7 read as Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception
Rapid7 (Deception within InsightIDR/XDR) read as Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception
Rapid7 InsightIDR read as Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception
SentinelOne read as SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne (Attivo Networks ThreatDefend) read as SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne (Attivo Networks acquisition) read as SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne (Attivo Networks) read as SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity Deception read as SentinelOne Singularity Hologram
SentinelOne Singularity Deception (formerly Attivo Networks ThreatDefend) read as SentinelOne Singularity Hologram
Zscaler read as Zscaler Deception
Unresolved, counted raw
Acalvio 360 Deception
Allure Security Technology, Inc.
Attivo Networks, now SentinelOne Deception / ThreatDeception
BOTsink (SentinelOne legacy)
Cisco Secure Cloud Insights
CyberReason
Deceptive Bytes Platform
Fortinet FortiDeception
Fortinet – FortiDeceptor
Guardicore, now Akamai Guardicore
Logrhythm, Inc.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Deception
Modern Honey Network - MHN
Proofpoint Deception / Illusive Networks
SentinelOne's Attivo technology
SentinelOne's Superna
SentinelOne’s Attivo-derived capability
Thinkst Applied Research (Thinkst Canary)
Threatisle
Zscaler’s Smokescreen-derived capability
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.