API security platforms · November 2026 Edition
OWASP ZAP vs Traceable API Security Platform
Zero of fourteen models named OWASP ZAP first on the direct prompt; zero named Traceable API Security Platform. OWASP ZAP was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Traceable API Security Platform by thirteen and OWASP ZAP carries 16 labels and Traceable API Security Platform 40, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in six categories this edition.
Traceable API Security Platform
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
First-choice share8%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%15%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels1640A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, OWASP ZAP reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Salt Security was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Salt Security vs OWASP ZAP · Salt Security vs Traceable API Security Platform · Zuplo vs OWASP ZAP
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the API security platforms page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OWASP ZAPFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTraceable API Security PlatformDirect001 against Traceable API Security Platform
Paraphrase02
Comparative00
Budget-constrained402 against Traceable API Security Platform
Scale-constrained00
Negative013 against Traceable API Security Platform
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where OWASP ZAP and Traceable API Security Platform stood in it.
| Model | DirectTA | ParaphraseTA | ComparativeTA | Budget-constrainedTA | Scale-constrainedTA | NegativeTA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | TA | TA | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | TA | TA | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | TA | TA | TA | TA | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | TA | TA | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | TA | TA | TA | | TA | |
| Mistral Small | TA | | | TA | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | TA | TA | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | TA | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | TA | TA | TA | TA | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | TA | TA | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | TA | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | TA | TA | TA |
OWASP ZAPTA Traceable API Security Platform first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, OWASP ZAP on the left and Traceable API Security Platform on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where OWASP ZAP and Traceable API Security Platform stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Orca Security alternatives: Check Point CloudGuard WAF, Cloudflare API Shield, Imperva API Security, Invicti API Security, Salt Security, Traceable API Security Platform
GPT-5.4 miniAkamai API Security alternatives: 42Crunch, Akto, Imperva API Security, Salt Security, Traceable API Security Platform, Wallarm API Security
Gemini 3.5 FlashWallarm API Security alternatives: 42Crunch, Cloudflare API Shield, Salt Security, Traceable API Security Platform
Perplexity SonarCloudflare API Shield alternatives: 42Crunch, Traceable API Security Platform
Grok 4.20Salt Security alternatives: Cequence Unified API Protection, Cloudflare API Shield, Fastly, Traceable API Security Platform, Wallarm API Security
DeepSeek V4 FlashWallarm API Security alternatives: 42Crunch, Akamai API Security, Cequence Unified API Protection, Cloudflare API Shield, Traceable API Security Platform
Llama 4 MaverickWallarm API Security alternatives: Aikido Security, Gravitee, OWASP ZAP, Zuplo
MiniMax M2.5Salt Security alternatives: Cequence Unified API Protection, Imperva API Security, Noname Security, Traceable API Security Platform
Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Mistral SmallGravitee, Zuplo alternatives: Graylog, Kong Gateway
Qwen 3.7 Flash42Crunch, Zuplo alternatives: Aikido Security, Salt Security
Kimi K2Levo.ai alternatives: 42Crunch, StackHawk, Wallarm API Security
GLM 4.7 FlashXZuplo alternatives: Akamai API Security, Cequence Unified API Protection
GPT-6 LunaWallarm API Security alternatives: Akamai API Security, Cloudflare API Shield, Salt Security
Muse Glimmer 30BZuplo alternatives: 42Crunch, Akamai API Security, Cloudflare Application Security and Performance, Imperva Application Security Platform, Salt Security
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
OWASP ZAP leads by four points.
OWASP ZAP4%#6 of 13Traceable API Security Platform0%#11 of 13
The full small business standing →Mid-marketThe figures above
OWASP ZAP leads by four points.
OWASP ZAP8%#5 of 15Traceable API Security Platform4%#7 of 15
The full mid-market standing →Enterprise
The order flips: Traceable API Security Platform leads at enterprise.
Traceable API Security Platform4%#3 of 13
OWASP ZAP0%#– of 13What the models said about OWASP ZAP
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“OWASP ZAP is the most widely used open-source DAST tool and the strongest free option for API security testing.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Free/Open-Source Choice ... Completely free and open-source, with no usage limits or hidden fees.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Traceable API Security Platform
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Enterprise-focused pricing and deployment” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Also has a 12% negative rate, which, while lower than Salt and Akamai, is still worth noting for potential issues.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Premium platforms such as Salt, Traceable, and Akamai are generally better suited to larger organizations” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Top picks for runtime/behavioral: Salt Security, Traceable, Wallarm, Cequence, or Data Theorem” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Mid-Sized Tech & SaaS: [Traceable AI]” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Wallarm or Traceable AI” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Salt Security vs OWASP ZAPSalt Security vs Traceable API Security PlatformZuplo vs OWASP ZAPZuplo vs Traceable API Security PlatformWallarm API Security vs OWASP ZAPWallarm API Security vs Traceable API Security PlatformCloudflare API Shield vs OWASP ZAPCloudflare API Shield vs Traceable API Security PlatformOWASP ZAP vs Akamai API SecurityOWASP ZAP vs Kong GatewayAkamai API Security vs Traceable API Security PlatformTraceable API Security Platform vs Kong GatewayAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full API security standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.