Wiz is a cloud and AI security platform that covers cloud security posture, container and Kubernetes security, and attack surface management from code to runtime · wiz.io ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is first at 33%.
Ranked first. Next is Orca Security at 18%. 12 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first. Next is Prisma Cloud at 12%.
“Wiz transformed the market by pioneering agentless scanning paired with a visual Security Graph... Want fastest time-to-value, zero deployment friction, and best risk visualization | Wiz or Orca”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“Often praised for rapid growth and agentless scanning. Strong in visibility, risk prioritization, and multi-cloud support. Frequently a Customers’ Choice winner.”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · first choice
“Wiz is widely regarded as the top choice due to its comprehensive visibility, strong security analytics, and ease of use across multi-cloud environments.”Mistral Small · Direct question · first choice
“Wiz is considered the best overall CNAPP platform for its agentless cloud visibility, security graph risk context, and fast cloud risk assessment”Llama 4 Maverick · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Wiz Essential starts around $24,000 ... reviewers note complex licensing and overwhelming feature sets for smaller teams”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“What to Avoid on a Tight Budget ... Enterprise platforms like Wiz ... typically start at $15,000–$24,000+/year”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“What to Avoid on a Budget - Wiz — Industry leader but pricing is typically enterprise-scale and can get expensive”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“often require sales quotes and start much higher ... making them unsuitable for tight budgets”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Wiz, over the 854 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 397 | 32 | Compare → | |
| 386 | 30 | Compare → | |
| 366 | 61 | Compare → | |
| 215 | 15 | Compare → | |
| 197 | 0 | View → | |
| 177 | 10 | Compare → | |
| 116 | 52 | Compare → | |
| 114 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 99 | 20 | Compare → | |
| 99 | 6 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of Wiz →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Wiz's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 764 of the 854 answers that named Wiz and are not a share of its labels.
1,399 of the 1,705 domain citations in answers naming Wiz came from a third party's page. 153 were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 12 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 5 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 16 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 12 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 31 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 5 | 11 | 0 | 5 | 21 |
| Grok 4.20 | 13 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 35 |
| Mistral Small | 5 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 14 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 8 | 10 | 4 | 7 | 29 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 3 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 11 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 8 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 26 |
| Kimi K2 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 23 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 9 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 16 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 17 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 7 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 19 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 684 | 39 | 2026-09-28 | CNAPP, CSPM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 674 | 17 | 2026-09-25 | CSPM, ASM | |
| Conference or event | 660 | 17 | 2026-11-10 | CNAPP, SAST | |
| Case study | 105 | 0 | 2024-08-21 | ||
| Comparison | 68 | 3 | 2026-09-22 | CSPM, CNAPP | |
| News or press | 36 | 2 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 17 | 2 | 2026-10-15 | CNAPP | |
| Report or ebook | 17 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2026-02-26 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2023-06-12 |
As the event pages on wiz.io state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page wiz.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.