Application security posture management
Asked as “ASPM platform”, and as “application security posture management tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
40%
Clear leader
40Aikido Security12DefectDojo10Cycode ASPM38others
40% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+3Since October 2026: 37% → 40%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Aikido Security held the lead, +3 points on 37%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Aikido Security81%Consensus▲+10Since October 2026: 71% → 81%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketAikido Security40%Clear leader▲+3Since October 2026: 37% → 40%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
ArmorCode32%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ArmorCode (32%) replaces Checkmarx One ASPM (24% then, 17% now), 15 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →
Aikido Security81%Consensus▲+10Since October 2026: 71% → 81%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketAikido Security40%Clear leader▲+3Since October 2026: 37% → 40%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseArmorCode32%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ArmorCode (32%) replaces Checkmarx One ASPM (24% then, 17% now), 15 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Aikido Security40%0%36endorsed leader▲+3Since October 2026: 37% → 40%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.37% → 40%
Aikido Security40%0%36endorsed leader▲+3Since October 2026: 37% → 40%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.37% → 40%02
DefectDojo12%12%26accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 10% → 12%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 12%
DefectDojo12%12%26accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 10% → 12%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.10% → 12%03
Cycode ASPM10%13%47accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 8% → 10%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 10%
Cycode ASPM10%13%47accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 8% → 10%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 10%04ArmorCode8%22%40accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 4% → 8%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 8%
ArmorCode8%22%40accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 4% → 8%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 8%05
Snyk6%12%34accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 14% → 6%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.14% → 6%
Snyk6%12%34accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 14% → 6%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.14% → 6%06
Wiz4%29%24criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
Wiz4%29%24criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%07
Apiiro2%27%30criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Apiiro2%27%30criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%08
Legit Security2%19%27accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Legit Security2%19%27accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%09
Jit2%0%11accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%
Jit2%0%11accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 2%10
Veracode Risk Manager2%38%21criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Veracode Risk Manager2%38%21criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14
Checkmarx One ASPM0%30%27criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Checkmarx One ASPM0%30%27criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
Snyk AppRisk0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Snyk AppRisk0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
OX Security0%0%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
OX Security0%0%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Aikido Security vs SnykAikido Security vs WizAikido Security vs ApiiroAikido Security vs Legit SecurityDefectDojo vs Cycode ASPMDefectDojo vs ArmorCodeDefectDojo vs SnykDefectDojo vs WizDefectDojo vs ApiiroDefectDojo vs Legit SecurityCycode ASPM vs ArmorCodeCycode ASPM vs SnykCycode ASPM vs WizCycode ASPM vs ApiiroCycode ASPM vs Legit SecurityArmorCode vs SnykArmorCode vs WizArmorCode vs ApiiroArmorCode vs Legit SecuritySnyk vs WizSnyk vs ApiiroSnyk vs Legit SecurityWiz vs ApiiroWiz vs Legit SecurityApiiro vs Legit Security
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Aikido Security40%
Aikido Security40%02DefectDojo12%
DefectDojo12%03Cycode ASPM10%
Cycode ASPM10%04ArmorCode8%
ArmorCode8%05Snyk6%
Snyk6%06Wiz4%
Wiz4%07Apiiro2%
Apiiro2%08Legit Security2%
Legit Security2%09Jit2%
Jit2%10Veracode Risk Manager2%
Veracode Risk Manager2%11OX Security0%
OX Security0%12CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM0%
CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM0%13Snyk AppRisk0%
Snyk AppRisk0%14Checkmarx One ASPM0%
Checkmarx One ASPM0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Apiiro27%
8 of 30 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“explicitly recommend avoiding these for smaller organizations due to high costs and complexity” Mistral Small, negative prompt
ArmorCode22%
9 of 40 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Multiple AI models explicitly recommend avoiding these for smaller organizations due to high costs and complexity.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Veracode Risk Manager38%
8 of 21 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“High criticism (up to 80%). Often seen as legacy-heavy” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Checkmarx One ASPM30%
8 of 27 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Around 71% negative in certain evaluations... criticized for vendor lock-in, alert fatigue” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 844 links across 180 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 76 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
42 answers · 42 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Cycode32 answers · 42 citations · 13 models
vendor site · G231 answers · 53 citations · 11 models
publisher (Gane)21 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
21 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Guideflow21 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
vendor site · GitHub20 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Checkmarx20 answers · 27 citations · 8 models
vendor site · OX20 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Aikido19 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · DefectDojo18 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
42 answers · 11 models
21 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “aspm platform”, “aspm platforms”, “best aspm platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aikido aikido.dev Aikido Security 40% | 40% | 326 | 2,400 | 51 | 6,442 company | $936 | 120 | |
| DefectDojo defectdojo.com DefectDojo 12%, DefectDojo Community Edition 2% | 13% | 78 | 880 | 9 | 603 | 1 | ||
| Cycode ASPM cycode.com | 10% | 120 | 20 | 0 | 17,954 | 4 | 5 | |
| ArmorCode armorcode.com | 8% | 135 | 1,300 | 15 | 11,106 | 9 | ||
| Snyk snyk.io Snyk 6%, Snyk AppRisk 0% | 6% | 150 | 12,100 | 581 | 61,651 | 60 | 6 | |
| Wiz wiz.io | 4% | 764 | 40,500 | 16,751 | 102,573 | $6,856 | 120 | 4 |
| Apiiro apiiro.com | 2% | 95 | 880 | 10 | 9,388 | 0 | ||
| Legit Security legitsecurity.com | 2% | 52 | 480 | 2,624 | 9,602 | 0 | 7 | |
| Jit jit.io | 2% | 66 | 33,100 | 6,450 | 5,093 | |||
| Faraday | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkmarx.com, csoonline.com, cycode.com, expertinsights.com, g2.com). The first result for “aspm platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best ASPM platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which application security posture management tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top ASPM platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best ASPM platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a ASPM platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which ASPM platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Aikido Securityno first choiceChangedApiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode ASPMAikido Security, Xygeni ASPMno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Cycode ASPM, JitFour alternatives
AccuKnox, OX Security, Phoenix Security ASPM, Snyk AppRiskOne alternative
DefectDojoGPT-5.4 miniArmorCodeArnica, Veracode Risk ManagerChangedno first choiceDefectDojono first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Checkmarx One ASPM, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Phoenix Security, WizOne alternative
Wiz ASPMFour alternatives
ArmorCode, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Snyk AppRisk, Veracode Risk ManagerTwo alternatives
Aikido Security, Snyk AppRiskGemini 3.5 FlashAikido SecurityCycode ASPMChangedno first choiceagainst: DefectDojoDefectDojoagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode ASPMno first choiceagainst: ArmorCode, Phoenix Security
Five alternatives
ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, OX Security, Snyk AppRiskThree alternatives
ArmorCode, Jit, Legit SecuritySeven alternatives
Aikido Security, Apiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, OX Security, SnykThree alternatives
Aikido Security, Faraday, JitPerplexity SonarAikido SecurityAikido SecurityHeldApiiro, Cycode ASPMagainst: DefectDojoAikido Securityno first choiceagainst: Bionic, CrowdStrike, Dazz, Snyk AppRisk, Wiz
Five alternatives
Apiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, WizThree alternatives
Cycode ASPM, Jit, Phoenix SecurityEight alternatives
Aikido Security, ArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Legit Security, OX Security, Palo Alto Cortex, Snyk AppRisk, WizTwo alternatives
DefectDojo, SnykGrok 4.20Aikido Securityagainst: Checkmarx One ASPM, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Prisma CloudApiiro, TromzoChangedagainst: Checkmarx One ASPM, Snyk, Veracode Risk ManagerApiiroDefectDojoagainst: Cycode ASPM, Endor Labs, Wizno first choiceagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, Veracode Risk Manager
Five alternatives
Apiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, OX Security, SnykOne alternative
CrowdStrike Falcon ASPMSeven alternatives
Aikido Security, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, Cycode ASPM, OX Security, Snyk, Veracode Risk ManagerTwo alternatives
Aikido Security, SnykMistral SmallAikido SecurityJitChangedArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPMCycode ASPM, Legit Securityno first choiceagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, Legit Security, Veracode Risk Manager
Three alternatives
Aikido Security, ArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPMSeven alternatives
Black Duck, Checkmarx One ASPM, Cycode ASPM, OX Security, Qualys, Snyk, Veracode Risk ManagerOne alternative
SnykDeepSeek V4 FlashAikido Securityagainst: Orca Security, WizAikido SecurityHeldagainst: ArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPMApiiroDefectDojono first choiceagainst: AWS Security Hub, Apiiro, Arnica, Azure Defender for App, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, GitHub Advanced Security, GitLab Ultimate, Snyk
Three alternatives
ArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Cycode ASPMTwo alternatives
Cycode ASPM, SnykSix alternatives
ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Cycode ASPM, OX Security, Snyk AppRiskOne alternative
Aikido SecurityLlama 4 MaverickAikido Securityno first choiceChangedno first choiceAikido Securityno first choiceagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, Veracode Risk Manager
Two alternatives
DefectDojo, SnykThree alternatives
Apiiro, Legit Security, SnykQwen 3.7 FlashAikido Securityagainst: CrowdStrike, WizSnykChangedArmorCode, Phoenix SecuritySnyk, Trivyagainst: Checkmarx One ASPM, HPE, Micro Focus, Veracode Risk Manager, Wizno first choiceagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, OpenText Fortify, Qualys, SonarQube, Veracode Risk Manager
Five alternatives
Cycode ASPM, DefectDojo, Jit, OX Security, SnykTwo alternatives
Mend, SonarQubeThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Cycode ASPM, Veracode Risk ManagerFive alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security, GitLab Ultimate, Grype, Mend, SonarQubeKimi K2Aikido Security, Cycode ASPMAikido SecurityChangedno first choiceagainst: Snyk, Veracode Risk ManagerAikido SecurityArmorCode, Cycode ASPMagainst: Cycode ASPM, Dazz, Enso Security, Longbow Security
Two alternatives
ArmorCode, Legit SecurityTwo alternatives
ArmorCode, SnykOne alternative
DefectDojoThree alternatives
Aikido Security, Apiiro, DefectDojoGLM 4.7 FlashXWizAikido SecurityChangedno first choiceDefectDojoagainst: Legit Securityno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Aikido Security, Apiiro, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, OX SecurityThree alternatives
Cycode ASPM, DefectDojo, SnykSeven alternatives
Apiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, OX Security, Snyk AppRisk, Software Risk Manager, WizTwo alternatives
Cycode ASPM, SnykMiniMax M2.5Aikido Security, SnykAikido SecurityChangedWizDefectDojo Community Editionagainst: Legit Securityno first choiceagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Veracode Risk Manager
Two alternatives
Cycode ASPM, Palo Alto Networks Cortex CloudThree alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Snyk, Veracode Risk ManagerNine alternatives
Apiiro, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, Cycode ASPM, Invicti ASPM, Jit, Legit Security, OX Security, Snyk ASPMTwo alternatives
Cycode ASPM, Plexicus ASPMGPT-6 LunaArmorCodeCycode ASPMChangedApiiro, ArmorCodeConviso Platformno first choiceagainst: DefectDojo
Two alternatives
Cycode ASPM, GitLab UltimateTwo alternatives
Aikido Security, ArmorCodeFour alternatives
Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, Snyk AppRisk, Wiz ASPMTwo alternatives
Aikido Security, DefectDojo Community EditionMuse Glimmer 30BAikido SecurityArmorCode, WizChangedWizAikido Security, DefectDojo, Faradayagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, CrowdStrike, Cycode ASPM, Wizno first choiceagainst: Invicti ASPM, Snyk, Wiz
Two alternatives
DefectDojo, SnykFour alternatives
Checkmarx One ASPM, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, Snyk ASPMSeven alternatives
Apiiro, ArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Cycode ASPM, OX Security, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, SnykTwo alternatives
Cycode ASPM, Legit SecurityBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 2 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:40 | yes | 7 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:56 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:49 | yes | 22 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:30 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 19:18 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 11 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:34 | yes | 20 | 42 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 9 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:15 | yes | 11 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:02 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:54 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:00 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:43 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:27 | yes | 22 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:18 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:04 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:56 | yes | 18 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 22 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:35 | yes | 8 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:06 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:22 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:33 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:05 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:36 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:38 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:54 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 20 | 43 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:45 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 22 | 78 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:57 | yes | 13 | 42 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:27 | yes | 14 | 68 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:05 | yes | 20 | 73 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 8 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:34 | yes | 15 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:32 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:51 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:50 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 18:27 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 22 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:34 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:41 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 19 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:28 | yes | 19 | 332 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:10 | yes | 18 | 79 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:36 | yes | 3 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:02 | yes | 12 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:21 | yes | 16 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:23 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:14 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:34 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:36 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:44 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:24 | yes | 13 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:18 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 5 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:29 | yes | 24 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:36 | yes | 18 | 99 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:04 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 1 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:23 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:03 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 7 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:16 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:01 | yes | 13 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:29 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:15 | yes | 24 | 54 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:22 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:16 | yes | 10 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:44 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:37 | yes | 20 | 44 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:56 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 13 | 19 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aikido read as Aikido Security
Checkmarx read as Checkmarx One ASPM
Checkmarx (OneSpan) read as Checkmarx One ASPM
Checkmarx (including Checkmarx One) read as Checkmarx One ASPM
Checkmarx ASPM read as Checkmarx One ASPM
Checkmarx One read as Checkmarx One ASPM
Checkmarx One (with ASPM) read as Checkmarx One ASPM
Cycode read as Cycode ASPM
Cycode Complete ASPM read as Cycode ASPM
GitLab read as GitLab Ultimate
Invicti read as Invicti ASPM
Jit.io read as Jit
Mend.io read as Mend
Palo Alto Prisma Cloud / Cortex Cloud read as Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud
Plexicus read as Plexicus ASPM
Veracode read as Veracode Risk Manager
Xygeni read as Xygeni ASPM
Unresolved, counted raw
ARMO
Azure Defender for App
Enso Security
Legit
Longbow Security
Phoenix Security ASPM
Snyk AppSec / GitHub Advanced Security
Software Risk Manager (Black Duck)
Strobes Security
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.