Application security posture management for enterprise buyers
Asked as “ASPM platform”, and as “application security posture management tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
32%
Contested · Checkmarx One ASPM 17%
32ArmorCode17Checkmarx One ASPM11Apiiro40others
32% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ArmorCode (32%) replaces Checkmarx One ASPM (24% then, 17% now), 15 points clear, past the 11-point floor.ArmorCode leads at 32%, replacing Checkmarx One ASPM, which led at 24% and stands at 17% now: 15 points clear, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Aikido Security81%Consensus▲+10Since October 2026: 71% → 81%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketAikido Security40%Clear leader▲+3Since October 2026: 37% → 40%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
ArmorCode32%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ArmorCode (32%) replaces Checkmarx One ASPM (24% then, 17% now), 15 points clear, past the 11-point floor.This page
Aikido Security81%Consensus▲+10Since October 2026: 71% → 81%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketAikido Security40%Clear leader▲+3Since October 2026: 37% → 40%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseArmorCode32%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ArmorCode (32%) replaces Checkmarx One ASPM (24% then, 17% now), 15 points clear, past the 11-point floor.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01ArmorCode32%12%60endorsed leader▲+12Since October 2026: 20% → 32%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.20% → 32%
ArmorCode32%12%60endorsed leader▲+12Since October 2026: 20% → 32%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.20% → 32%02
Checkmarx One ASPM17%8%40accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 24% → 17%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.24% → 17%
Checkmarx One ASPM17%8%40accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 24% → 17%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.24% → 17%03
Cycode ASPM11%4%47accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 6% → 11%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 11%
Cycode ASPM11%4%47accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 6% → 11%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 11%04
Apiiro11%6%47accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 12% → 11%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 11%
Apiiro11%6%47accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 12% → 11%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 11%05
Wiz11%39%23criticized challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 4% → 11%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 11%
Wiz11%39%23criticized challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 4% → 11%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 11%06
CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM4%0%23accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM4%0%23accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%07
DefectDojo4%18%17accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%
DefectDojo4%18%17accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 4%08
Veracode Risk Manager2%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Veracode Risk Manager2%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12
Snyk0%48%25criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Snyk0%48%25criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%11
Snyk AppRisk0%25%16criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Snyk AppRisk0%25%16criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%10
Legit Security0%7%15accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Legit Security0%7%15accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%09
OX Security0%0%34accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
OX Security0%0%34accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Aikido Security vs SnykAikido Security vs WizAikido Security vs ApiiroAikido Security vs Legit SecurityDefectDojo vs Cycode ASPMDefectDojo vs ArmorCodeDefectDojo vs SnykDefectDojo vs WizDefectDojo vs ApiiroDefectDojo vs Legit SecurityCycode ASPM vs ArmorCodeCycode ASPM vs SnykCycode ASPM vs WizCycode ASPM vs ApiiroCycode ASPM vs Legit SecurityArmorCode vs SnykArmorCode vs WizArmorCode vs ApiiroArmorCode vs Legit SecuritySnyk vs WizSnyk vs ApiiroSnyk vs Legit SecurityWiz vs ApiiroWiz vs Legit SecurityApiiro vs Legit Security
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01ArmorCode32%
ArmorCode32%02Checkmarx One ASPM17%
Checkmarx One ASPM17%03Cycode ASPM11%
Cycode ASPM11%04Apiiro11%
Apiiro11%05Wiz11%
Wiz11%06CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM4%
CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM4%07DefectDojo4%
DefectDojo4%08Veracode Risk Manager2%
Veracode Risk Manager2%09OX Security0%
OX Security0%10Legit Security0%
Legit Security0%11Snyk AppRisk0%
Snyk AppRisk0%12Snyk0%
Snyk0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Snyk48%
12 of 25 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Snyk is mentioned as a platform to avoid for predictable costs, as its pricing model scales with the number of applications, developers, or scans” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Wiz39%
9 of 23 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid for Cost Predictability | Wiz | Custom quote, asset-based | Unpredictable with cloud growth” Kimi K2, budget prompt
ArmorCode12%
7 of 60 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Complex multi-variable model” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Snyk AppRisk25%
4 of 16 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid if you want a tool-agnostic governance layer.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
80 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 994 links across 201 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 76 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
49 answers · 50 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Cycode39 answers · 58 citations · 14 models
vendor site · OX35 answers · 38 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Checkmarx34 answers · 57 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G232 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · GitHub24 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · DefectDojo21 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
21 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
vendor site · GitHub21 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
20 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Safeguard19 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
49 answers · 11 models
29 answers · 10 models
28 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 11 models
15 answers · 6 models
14 answers · 6 models
13 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “aspm platform”, “aspm platforms”, “best aspm platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ArmorCode armorcode.com | 32% | 135 | 1,300 | 15 | 11,106 | 9 | ||
| Checkmarx checkmarx.com Checkmarx One ASPM 17% | 17% | 80 | 54,982 company | 61 | 4 | |||
| Cycode ASPM cycode.com | 11% | 120 | 20 | 0 | 17,954 | 4 | 5 | |
| Apiiro apiiro.com | 11% | 95 | 880 | 10 | 9,388 | 0 | ||
| Wiz wiz.io | 11% | 764 | 40,500 | 16,751 | 102,573 | $6,856 | 120 | 4 |
| Aikido aikido.dev Aikido Security 6% | 6% | 326 | 2,400 | 51 | 6,442 company | $936 | 120 | |
| CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM crowdstrike.com | 4% | 41 | 20 | 0 | 715,209 | $13,967 | 119 | |
| DefectDojo defectdojo.com | 4% | 78 | 880 | 9 | 603 | 1 | ||
| Veracode veracode.com Veracode Risk Manager 2% | 2% | 45 | 4,400 | 194 | 12,543 company | 17 | ||
| Wiz ASPM | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkmarx.com, csoonline.com, cycode.com, expertinsights.com, g2.com, gartner.com). The first result for “aspm platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best ASPM platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which application security posture management tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade ASPM platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best ASPM platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a ASPM platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which ASPM platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5WizApiiroChangedno first choiceAikido Securityno first choiceagainst: Cycode ASPM
Four alternatives
Aikido Security, ArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud Application SecurityThree alternatives
ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, Cycode ASPMThree alternatives
Apiiro, ArmorCode, OX SecurityOne alternative
ArmorCodeGPT-5.4 miniArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPMCheckmarx One ASPMChangedno first choiceCheckmarx One ASPMagainst: Snykno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Cycode ASPM, Invicti ASPM, Vulcan CyberTwo alternatives
GitLab Ultimate, MendEight alternatives
ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, Cycode ASPM, Invicti ASPM, OX Security, OpenText Fortify, Veracode Risk Manager, Wiz ASPMOne alternative
MendGemini 3.5 FlashArmorCodeApiiro, ArmorCodeChangedApiiroArmorCodeagainst: Snyk AppRiskno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Apiiro, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Cycode ASPM, OX Security, WizThree alternatives
Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, Snyk AppRiskFive alternatives
ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, OX Security, SnykThree alternatives
Apiiro, Cycode ASPM, OX SecurityPerplexity SonarCheckmarx One ASPMCheckmarx One ASPMHeldCycode ASPMAikido Securityno first choiceagainst: ArmorCode, CrowdStrike, DefectDojo, Legit Security, Palo Alto Networks, Snyk ASPM, Wiz
Four alternatives
Apiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, WizFour alternatives
Apiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, Snyk ASPMEight alternatives
Apiiro, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Legit Security, Palo Alto Cortex Cloud App Security, Snyk AppRisk, WizThree alternatives
ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, WizGrok 4.20Checkmarx One ASPMagainst: Snyk, WizArmorCodeChangedagainst: DefectDojoApiiroagainst: DefectDojo, Snyk, Veracode Risk ManagerCrowdStrike Falcon ASPMagainst: ArmorCode, Endor Labs, Snyk AppRiskno first choiceagainst: ArmorCode, Black Duck, Checkmarx One ASPM, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, Nucleus Security, Veracode Risk Manager, Wiz
Three alternatives
ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, Veracode Risk ManagerThree alternatives
Checkmarx One ASPM, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Veracode Risk ManagerFive alternatives
Aikido Security, ArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Cycode ASPM, OX SecurityOne alternative
OX SecurityMistral SmallCycode ASPMArmorCodeChangedArmorCodeArmorCodeno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Apiiro, ArmorCodeThree alternatives
Apiiro, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Cycode ASPMSix alternatives
Apiiro, Checkmarx One ASPM, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Cycode ASPM, DefectDojo, OX SecurityDeepSeek V4 FlashArmorCodeArmorCodeHeldCycode ASPMArmorCodeagainst: Checkmarx One ASPM, Snyk, Veracode Risk Manager, Wizno first choiceagainst: ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, Snyk, Snyk AppRisk
Four alternatives
Apiiro, Cycode ASPM, OX Security, Snyk AppRiskFour alternatives
Checkmarx One ASPM, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, OX Security, Snyk ASPMFive alternatives
Apiiro, ArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, OX Security, Snyk AppRiskOne alternative
CrowdStrike Falcon ASPMLlama 4 MaverickArmorCodeno first choiceChangedCycode ASPMno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, Snyk
Four alternatives
Apiiro, Checkmarx One ASPM, Cycode ASPM, DefectDojoQwen 3.7 FlashApiiroApiiro, ArmorCodeChangedArmorCodeagainst: Snyk AppRiskVeracode Risk Manageragainst: Snyk, Wizno first choiceagainst: Plexicus ASPM, Snyk
Five alternatives
ArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, DefectDojo, Legit Security, SnykTwo alternatives
Checkmarx One ASPM, Snyk ASPMThree alternatives
Apiiro, Cycode ASPM, OX SecurityThree alternatives
ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, MendKimi K2Checkmarx One ASPM, Cycode ASPMCycode ASPMChangedCheckmarx One ASPMCycode ASPMagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, CrowdStrike ASPM, Wizno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
ArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPMThree alternatives
Apiiro, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPMSix alternatives
Apiiro, ArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, Snyk AppRiskThree alternatives
DefectDojo, Legit Security, SnykGLM 4.7 FlashXCycode ASPMCheckmarx One ASPMChangedApiiro, Cycode ASPMDefectDojoagainst: Snykno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Apiiro, ArmorCode, DefectDojo, OX SecurityThree alternatives
ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, SnykSeven alternatives
ArmorCode, DefectDojo, Legit Security, OX Security, Prisma Cloud, Snyk ASPM, WizTwo alternatives
Aikido Security, AppOmniMiniMax M2.5CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, WizWizChangedno first choiceDefectDojoagainst: Invicti ASPM, Rapid7, Snykno first choiceagainst: Snyk, Wiz
Two alternatives
ArmorCode, SnykFour alternatives
Orca Security, Qualys, Snyk, TenableOne alternative
Aikido SecurityGPT-6 LunaArmorCode, Wiz ASPMArmorCodeChangedApiiro, ArmorCodeApiiroagainst: ArmorCodeno first choiceagainst: Ivanti Neurons for ASPM
Three alternatives
Apiiro, Checkmarx One ASPM, Snyk AppRiskTwo alternatives
Cycode ASPM, Wiz ASPMFive alternatives
CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, OX Security, Snyk AppRiskMuse Glimmer 30BWizArmorCode, WizChangedCycode ASPMAikido Securityagainst: Prisma Cloud, Wizno first choiceagainst: Apiiro, Snyk, Wiz
Five alternatives
Apiiro, ArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Cycode ASPM, Prisma CloudOne alternative
CrowdStrike Falcon ASPMSix alternatives
Apiiro, ArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, OX Security, Snyk ASPM, Snyk AppRiskOne alternative
ArmorCodeBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:28 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:34 | yes | 7 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:58 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:46 | yes | 15 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:07 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 18:59 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:11 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 9 | 49 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:55 | yes | 20 | 180 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:34 | yes | 14 | 51 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:15 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:17 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:21 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:27 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:40 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:20 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 23 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:31 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 19 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 19 | 84 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:48 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:58 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:56 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 7 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:00 | yes | 11 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:00 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:17 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 14 | 13 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 23 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:42 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:03 | yes | 13 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:21 | yes | 18 | 67 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:31 | yes | 16 | 42 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 9 | 18 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:18 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:02 | yes | 9 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:48 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:46 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:22 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:06 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:05 | yes | 15 | 76 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:20 | yes | 22 | 51 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:07 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 17 | 63 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 19:16 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:25 | yes | 16 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:22 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:22 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:27 | yes | 15 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:19 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:04 | yes | 22 | 62 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:05 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 5 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:29 | yes | 23 | 43 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:33 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:15 | yes | 2 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:06 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:06 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:33 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:15 | yes | 19 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:42 | yes | 13 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:09 | yes | 23 | 85 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:54 | yes | 9 | 51 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:15 | yes | 25 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:00 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:36 | yes | 15 | 46 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:48 | yes | 22 | 25 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aikido read as Aikido Security
Checkmarx read as Checkmarx One ASPM
Checkmarx (Checkmarx One) read as Checkmarx One ASPM
Checkmarx ASPM read as Checkmarx One ASPM
Checkmarx ASPM (part of Checkmarx One) read as Checkmarx One ASPM
Checkmarx One read as Checkmarx One ASPM
Checkmarx One (ASPM module) read as Checkmarx One ASPM
CrowdStrike Falcon read as CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
Cycode read as Cycode ASPM
GitLab read as GitLab Ultimate
Invicti read as Invicti ASPM
Mend.io read as Mend
Nucleus read as Nucleus Security
Orca read as Orca Security
Plexicus read as Plexicus ASPM
Veracode read as Veracode Risk Manager
Unresolved, counted raw
CrowdStrike ASPM
Ivanti ASPM
Palo Alto Cortex Cloud App Security
Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud Application Security
Palo Alto Networks' Cortex Cloud
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.