Application security posture management · RankedApiiro
Apiiro is an application security posture management product for large enterprises · apiiro.com ↗
Strongest at enterprise. Ranked 70 of 70 for small business buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Aikido Security is first at 81%.
Aikido Security is first at 40%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
ArmorCode is first at 32%.
Why models recommend it
“The strongest choices are Cycode, Apiiro, ArmorCode, Legit Security, OX Security, Snyk AppRisk, Wiz, and ecosystem offerings from Palo Alto and CrowdStrike”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · first choice
“Top-tier risk scoring with business & code context, strong in Gartner evaluations... Gartner-recognized leader (4.6/5 Peer Insights)”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · first choice
“Keep your existing scanners: start with ArmorCode or Apiiro.”GPT-6 Luna · Comparative question · first choice
“Gartner Magic Quadrant *Leader* (highest Peer Insights rating ~4.6)”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
What gives them pause
“explicitly recommend avoiding these for smaller organizations due to high costs and complexity”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“Frequently criticized as a "pure-play" tool with high negatives (up to 85% in some analyses)”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“some ASPM platforms that are considered "criticized challengers" include Apiiro... may have pricing models that are not suitable for small or mid-sized businesses”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
“flagged certain early-stage or niche ASPM aggregators (e.g., Apiiro, ArmorCode in specific contexts) with higher "negative rates" or criticism”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Apiiro, over the 99 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 92 | 14 | Compare → | |
| 79 | 10 | Compare → | |
| 54 | 4 | View → | |
| 49 | 0 | View → | |
| 43 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 39 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 35 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 34 | 7 | Compare → | |
| 32 | 19 | Compare → | |
| 28 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Apiiro →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Apiiro's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- CISO, AppSec, Developer, Pen-Tester, GRC
- Price stated
- Free AutoFix
- Free plan or trial
- Free AutoFix
- Integrations
- 100
- Certifications
- ISO 27001, SOC 2
- Customers named
- Shell, Cloudera, SoFi, Paddle, LTP, GSoft, Navan, Rakuten Rewards
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 95 of the 99 answers that named Apiiro and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
335 of the 368 domain citations in answers naming Apiiro came from a third party's page. Thirty-three were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 229 | undated | SAST, CSPM | ||
| Blog | 194 | undated | ASPM, SAST | ||
| Case study | 13 | undated | ASPM, SAST | ||
| Report or ebook | 12 | undated | ASPM | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 11 | undated | ASPM | ||
| Podcast or video | 8 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 6 | undated | ASPM, CSPM | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page apiiro.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.