Application security posture management · RankedLegit Security
Legit Security is an application security posture management platform that gives security teams visibility into the software development environment and a unified view of security signals across tools and teams · legitsecurity.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Aikido Security is first at 81%.
Aikido Security is first at 40%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
ArmorCode is first at 32%.
Why models recommend it
“For the lowest entry point, Cycode and Legit Security are the most budget-friendly”Mistral Small · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“purpose-built ASPM solutions like *Apiiro*, *Cycode*, or *Legit Security* generally offer stronger contextual correlation”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Negative question · alternative
“Emphasize software-factory policies and supply-chain governance: compare Legit and Apiiro.”GPT-6 Luna · Comparative question · alternative
“Better when protecting build pipelines and software-delivery infrastructure is the primary concern.”Perplexity Sonar · Direct question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Around 64% negative. Criticized for niche focus (e.g., supply chain), high costs”Grok 4.20 · Negative question · warning
“also mentioned among those criticized for not being ideal for small businesses”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“considered "criticized challengers" include ... Legit Security”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
“Consideration: Higher cost but comprehensive feature set”MiniMax M2.5 · Budget-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Legit Security, over the 58 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 10 | Compare → | |
| 47 | 7 | Compare → | |
| 43 | 9 | Compare → | |
| 26 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 26 | 1 | View → | |
| 25 | 0 | View → | |
| 24 | 16 | Compare → | |
| 24 | 6 | Compare → | |
| 22 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 16 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Legit Security →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Legit Security's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- security teams
- Price stated
- Plans & Packages
- Integrations
- 120
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001
- Hosting
- US
- Customers named
- Kraft-Heinz, ACV Auctions, Netskope, Chicago Board of Options Exchange (CBOE), Noname Security, Firebolt Analytics
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 52 of the 58 answers that named Legit Security and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
206 of the 206 domain citations in answers naming Legit Security came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 223 | 5 | 2026-10-01 | ASPM, CNAPP | |
| News or press | 40 | 1 | 2026-08-03 | ASPM, SAST | |
| Glossary or explainer | 38 | 0 | 2026-01-05 | SAST, Secrets | |
| Comparison | 11 | 0 | 2026-01-05 | SASE, SAST | |
| Case study | 8 | 0 | 2023-09-27 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2025-02-06 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-10-01Stop drowning in the 30 blog
- 2026-09-30Agentic remediation just got bigger now fixing vulnerabilities in your dependencies not just your code blog
- 2026-08-24Claude mythos 5 can find the vulnerabilities. but which ones actually matter blog
- 2026-08-20Your ai agent has new skills. can you trust them blog
- 2026-08-05Secure fast not slow what we learned building vibeguard 2.0 blog
- 2026-08-03Legit security launches vibeguard 2.0 news or press
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page legitsecurity.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.