Application security posture management for small business buyers
Asked as “ASPM platform”, and as “application security posture management tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 48 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
81%
Consensus
81Aikido Security08Jit04Cycode ASPM06others
81% of first choices, consensus.
Since October 2026▲+10Since October 2026: 71% → 81%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Aikido Security held the lead, +10 points on 71%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Aikido Security81%Consensus▲+10Since October 2026: 71% → 81%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketAikido Security40%Clear leader▲+3Since October 2026: 37% → 40%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
ArmorCode32%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ArmorCode (32%) replaces Checkmarx One ASPM (24% then, 17% now), 15 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →
Aikido Security81%Consensus▲+10Since October 2026: 71% → 81%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketAikido Security40%Clear leader▲+3Since October 2026: 37% → 40%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseArmorCode32%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ArmorCode (32%) replaces Checkmarx One ASPM (24% then, 17% now), 15 points clear, past the 11-point floor.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Aikido Security81%0%65endorsed leader▲+10Since October 2026: 71% → 81%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.71% → 81%
Aikido Security81%0%65endorsed leader▲+10Since October 2026: 71% → 81%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.71% → 81%02
Jit8%2%43accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 0% → 8%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 8%
Jit8%2%43accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 0% → 8%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 8%03
Cycode ASPM4%45%33criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Cycode ASPM4%45%33criticized challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%04
Snyk2%7%43accepted challenger▼−17Since October 2026: 19% → 2%, −17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.19% → 2%
Snyk2%7%43accepted challenger▼−17Since October 2026: 19% → 2%, −17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.19% → 2%05
DefectDojo2%22%32accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
DefectDojo2%22%32accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%06Conviso Platform2%0%10accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Show the eight products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14
Apiiro0%90%21criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Apiiro0%90%21criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Checkmarx One ASPM0%88%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Checkmarx One ASPM0%88%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Veracode Risk Manager0%86%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Veracode Risk Manager0%86%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13ArmorCode0%69%39criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
ArmorCode0%69%39criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Legit Security0%69%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Legit Security0%69%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Wiz0%64%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Wiz0%64%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
OX Security0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
OX Security0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
Snyk AppRisk0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Snyk AppRisk0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Aikido Security vs SnykAikido Security vs WizAikido Security vs ApiiroAikido Security vs Legit SecurityDefectDojo vs Cycode ASPMDefectDojo vs ArmorCodeDefectDojo vs SnykDefectDojo vs WizDefectDojo vs ApiiroDefectDojo vs Legit SecurityCycode ASPM vs ArmorCodeCycode ASPM vs SnykCycode ASPM vs WizCycode ASPM vs ApiiroCycode ASPM vs Legit SecurityArmorCode vs SnykArmorCode vs WizArmorCode vs ApiiroArmorCode vs Legit SecuritySnyk vs WizSnyk vs ApiiroSnyk vs Legit SecurityWiz vs ApiiroWiz vs Legit SecurityApiiro vs Legit Security
One product takes 81% of first choices here, so the chart would put thirteen markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Seven products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Eleven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Gemini 3.5 Flash, Mistral Small and Llama 4 Maverick changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
ArmorCode69%
27 of 39 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“Why to avoid: Described as "pure-play ASPM tools" designed for large enterprises, not recommended for small businesses” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Checkmarx One ASPM88%
14 of 16 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Another platform with high costs and enterprise-focused features, which may not justify the investment for smaller organizations.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Apiiro90%
19 of 21 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 11 hard negative
“Apiiro, Veracode Risk Manager, ArmorCode, and Checkmarx One have high negative rates and are considered "criticized challengers"” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Veracode Risk Manager86%
12 of 14 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Frequently flagged as an "enterprise-focused legacy monolith" unsuitable for SMBs due to complexity, slow scans, frequent false positives” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
80 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 925 links across 189 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 76 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · G251 answers · 81 citations · 12 models
publisher (Gane)39 answers · 50 citations · 10 models
36 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
35 answers · 39 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Aikido32 answers · 54 citations · 11 models
32 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Cycode28 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Checkmarx27 answers · 30 citations · 12 models
vendor site · GitHub25 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Safeguard19 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SourceForge17 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 16 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
49 answers · 12 models
36 answers · 10 models
35 answers · 11 models
32 answers · 11 models
30 answers · 11 models
20 answers · 12 models
16 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 5 models
15 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “aspm platform”, “aspm platforms”, “best aspm platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aikido aikido.dev Aikido Security 81% | 81% | 326 | 2,400 | 51 | 6,442 company | $936 | 120 | |
| Jit jit.io | 8% | 66 | 33,100 | 6,450 | 5,093 | |||
| Cycode ASPM cycode.com | 4% | 120 | 20 | 0 | 17,954 | 4 | 5 | |
| Snyk snyk.io Snyk 2%, Snyk AppRisk 0% | 2% | 150 | 12,100 | 581 | 61,651 | 60 | 6 | |
| DefectDojo defectdojo.com | 2% | 78 | 880 | 9 | 603 | 1 | ||
| Conviso Platform | 2% | 10 | 0 | |||||
| OX Security ox.security | 0% | 79 | 2,400 | 72 | 5,625 | $447 | 14 | |
| ActiveState | 0% | |||||||
| Jit Security | 0% | |||||||
| Plexicus ASPM plexicus.ai | 0% | 7 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkmarx.com, csoonline.com, cycode.com, expertinsights.com, g2.com, sourceforge.net). The first result for “aspm platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best ASPM platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which application security posture management tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top ASPM platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best ASPM platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a ASPM platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which ASPM platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Aikido SecurityAikido SecurityHeldagainst: Legit Security, SnykAikido Security, JitAikido Securityno first choiceagainst: ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, Legit Security
Three alternatives
DefectDojo, Jit, Legit SecurityOne alternative
CrowdStrike Falcon ASPMThree alternatives
Cycode ASPM, OX Security, Snyk AppRiskTwo alternatives
DefectDojo, SnykGPT-5.4 miniAikido SecurityAikido SecurityHeldagainst: ActiveStateDefectDojoagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCodeno first choiceagainst: ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, Cycode ASPM, Mendno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Checkmarx One ASPM, Veracode Risk ManagerOne alternative
JitThree alternatives
Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, Veracode Risk ManagerOne alternative
PatchstackGemini 3.5 FlashAikido Securityagainst: DefectDojoAikido Security, JitChangedAikido Securityagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCodeAikido Securityagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, SnykCycode ASPM, Jitagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Wizagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, CrowdStrike, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, Palo Alto Networks, Phoenix Security, Veracode Risk Manager, Wiz
Three alternatives
Cycode ASPM, OX Security, Snyk AppRiskTwo alternatives
DefectDojo, SnykFour alternatives
Cycode ASPM, Jit, OX Security, SnykTwo alternatives
DefectDojo, JitThree alternatives
GitHub Advanced Security, GitLab Ultimate, SnykPerplexity SonarAikido SecurityAikido SecurityHeldAikido Securityagainst: Cycode ASPMAikido Securityagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode ASPMno first choiceagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, OX Security, Snyk AppRisk, Veracode Risk Manager
Four alternatives
ArmorCode, Jit, Snyk, WizFour alternatives
ArmorCode, Jit, Seemplicity, SnykFour alternatives
ArmorCode, DefectDojo, Jit, SnykThree alternatives
DefectDojo, Faraday, JitGrok 4.20Aikido Securityagainst: WizAikido SecurityHeldagainst: ArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPMAikido Security, Jitagainst: Snyk AppRisk, Veracode Risk ManagerAikido Securityagainst: ArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPMAikido Securityagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, Veracode Risk Manager
Two alternatives
ArmorCode, SnykFour alternatives
DefectDojo, Jit, Plexicus ASPM, SnykThree alternatives
ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, OX SecurityTwo alternatives
DefectDojo, SnykTwo alternatives
Phoenix Security, SnykMistral SmallAikido SecurityAikido Security, JitChangedAikido SecurityAikido Securityagainst: DefectDojo, Faradayno first choiceagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, Veracode Risk Manager
One alternative
DefectDojoThree alternatives
Cycode ASPM, Jit, OX SecurityDeepSeek V4 FlashAikido SecurityAikido SecurityHeldAikido Securityagainst: ArmorCodeAikido Securityagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, CrowdStrike, Cycode ASPM, Jit, Legit Security, Snyk, WizAikido Securityagainst: CrowdStrike, Palo Altoagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, Veracode Risk Manager
Two alternatives
Jit, SnykOne alternative
SnykFour alternatives
Cycode ASPM, DefectDojo, OX Security, Snyk AppRiskFour alternatives
ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, Seemplicity, SnykLlama 4 MaverickAikido Securityno first choiceChangedAikido SecurityAikido Securityno first choiceagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, Cortex Xpanse, CyCognito, Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, Veracode Risk Manager
Two alternatives
Conviso Platform, SnykQwen 3.7 FlashAikido Securityagainst: ArmorCode, DefectDojo, WizAikido SecurityHeldAikido Securityagainst: DefectDojoAikido Securityno first choiceagainst: DefectDojoagainst: AccuKnox, Apiiro, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, DefectDojo, Invicti ASPM
Two alternatives
Jit, SnykTwo alternatives
Jit, SnykThree alternatives
Cycode ASPM, Jit, SnykTwo alternatives
DefectDojo, JitKimi K2Aikido Securityagainst: CrowdStrike, Veracode Risk Manager, WizAikido SecurityHeldAikido Securityagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, OX SecurityCycode ASPM, DefectDojoSnykagainst: Apiiro, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, OX Securityagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, Veracode Risk Manager
Three alternatives
ArmorCode, Jit, SnykTwo alternatives
Jit, SnykTwo alternatives
Jit, SnykTwo alternatives
Legit Security, Snyk AppRiskTwo alternatives
ArmorCode, DefectDojoGLM 4.7 FlashXAikido SecurityAikido SecurityHeldagainst: Checkmarx One ASPMNew RelicJitagainst: ArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Cycode ASPMno first choiceagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, Cycode ASPM, Veracode Risk Manager
Five alternatives
Cycode ASPM, DefectDojo, Jit, OX Security, SnykTwo alternatives
Jit, SnykNine alternatives
AWS CloudWatch Application Signals, Atatus, Datadog, Dynatrace, Elastic APM, ManageEngine, Prometheus + Grafana, SigNoz, Site24x7Two alternatives
Aikido Security, SnykMiniMax M2.5Aikido Securityagainst: Checkmarx One ASPMAikido SecurityHeldAikido SecurityAikido Securityno first choiceagainst: Apiiro, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, DefectDojo, Veracode Risk Manager
Two alternatives
Jit, SnykOne alternative
Jit SecurityTwo alternatives
Jit Security, Snyk AppRiskTwo alternatives
Jit Security, SnykGPT-6 LunaAikido SecurityAikido SecurityHeldAikido Securityagainst: ArmorCodeConviso Platformno first choiceagainst: ArmorCode, CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM, Nucleus Security, Wiz
Two alternatives
DefectDojo, JitTwo alternatives
GitHub Code Security, SnykThree alternatives
GitHub Code Security, Semgrep, SnykTwo alternatives
Aikido Security, DefectDojo Open SourceMuse Glimmer 30BAikido Securityagainst: ArmorCodeAikido SecurityHeldAikido SecurityAikido Securityno first choiceagainst: Apiiro, ArmorCode, Checkmarx One ASPM, Cycode ASPM, Legit Security, Veracode Risk Manager
Two alternatives
Jit, SnykTwo alternatives
Jit, SnykThree alternatives
Jit, Plexicus ASPM, Snyk AppRiskTwo alternatives
DefectDojo, JitBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:01 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:48 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:35 | yes | 9 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:43 | yes | 17 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:52 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 12 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 9 | 50 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:51 | yes | 22 | 48 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 12 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:29 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:58 | yes | 11 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 1 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:28 | yes | 6 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:25 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:52 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:47 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:23 | yes | 14 | 63 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 22 | 93 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:15 | yes | 2 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:45 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:25 | yes | 10 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:34 | yes | 25 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:01 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 21 | 55 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:07 | yes | 23 | 94 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:23 | yes | 24 | 48 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:40 | yes | 6 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:29 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 6 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:05 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 23 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:39 | yes | 15 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:19 | yes | 23 | 88 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 20 | 48 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:20 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 14 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:01 | yes | 19 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:23 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:37 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:09 | yes | 14 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:03 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:01 | yes | 20 | 55 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:53 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 17 | 59 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 14 | 51 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 21 | 67 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:38 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:17 | yes | 1 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:00 | yes | 12 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:41 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:29 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:15 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:18 | yes | 20 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 21 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:17 | yes | 9 | 62 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:59 | yes | 21 | 59 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:24 | yes | 19 | 54 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 18 | 57 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:40 | yes | 2 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aikido read as Aikido Security
Checkmarx read as Checkmarx One ASPM
Checkmarx One read as Checkmarx One ASPM
Cycode read as Cycode ASPM
GitLab read as GitLab Ultimate
Invicti read as Invicti ASPM
Jit.io read as Jit
Jit.io (Jit) read as Jit
Nucleus read as Nucleus Security
Orca read as Orca Security
Plexicus read as Plexicus ASPM
Veracode read as Veracode Risk Manager
Unresolved, counted raw
Checkmarx Complete
CloudCustodian
DefectDojo Open Source
OpenCSPM
Patchstack
Snyk Platform
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.