Dynamic application security testing for small business buyers
Asked as “DAST tool”, and as “dynamic web application security scanner”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
51%
Clear leader
51OWASP ZAP17Intruder13StackHawk19others
51% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+8Since October 2026: 43% → 51%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.OWASP ZAP held the lead, +8 points on 43%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
OWASP ZAP51%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 43% → 51%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-market
Invicti33%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Invicti (33%) replaces OWASP ZAP (29% then, 26% now), 7 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseInvicti58%Clear leader▼−4Since October 2026: 62% → 58%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
OWASP ZAP51%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 43% → 51%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketInvicti33%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Invicti (33%) replaces OWASP ZAP (29% then, 26% now), 7 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseInvicti58%Clear leader▼−4Since October 2026: 62% → 58%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01OWASP ZAP51%9%75endorsed leader▲+8Since October 2026: 43% → 51%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.43% → 51%
OWASP ZAP51%9%75endorsed leader▲+8Since October 2026: 43% → 51%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.43% → 51%02
Intruder17%0%39accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 16% → 17%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.16% → 17%
Intruder17%0%39accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 16% → 17%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.16% → 17%03
StackHawk13%2%49accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 12% → 13%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 13%
StackHawk13%2%49accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 12% → 13%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 13%04
Acunetix8%47%34criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 9% → 8%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 8%
Acunetix8%47%34criticized challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 9% → 8%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 8%05
Probely4%0%17accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Probely4%0%17accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%06
Detectify2%0%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Detectify2%0%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%07
Nuclei2%7%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Nuclei2%7%14accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
HCL AppScan0%90%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
HCL AppScan0%90%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Rapid7 InsightAppSec0%69%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Rapid7 InsightAppSec0%69%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11Invicti0%43%37criticized challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%
Invicti0%43%37criticized challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%10Burp Suite0%38%37criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08
Aikido Security0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Aikido Security0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Astra Security0%20%10accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Astra Security0%20%10accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Invicti vs Bright SecurityInvicti vs EscapeInvicti vs ProbelyInvicti vs Veracode DASTOWASP ZAP vs AcunetixOWASP ZAP vs StackHawkOWASP ZAP vs Bright SecurityOWASP ZAP vs EscapeOWASP ZAP vs ProbelyOWASP ZAP vs Veracode DASTAcunetix vs StackHawkAcunetix vs Bright SecurityAcunetix vs EscapeAcunetix vs ProbelyAcunetix vs Veracode DASTStackHawk vs Bright SecurityStackHawk vs EscapeStackHawk vs ProbelyStackHawk vs Veracode DASTBright Security vs EscapeBright Security vs ProbelyBright Security vs Veracode DASTEscape vs ProbelyEscape vs Veracode DASTProbely vs Veracode DAST
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809B10
111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01OWASP ZAP51%
OWASP ZAP51%02Intruder17%
Intruder17%03StackHawk13%
StackHawk13%04Acunetix8%
Acunetix8%05Probely4%
Probely4%06Detectify2%
Detectify2%07Nuclei2%
Nuclei2%08Aikido Security0%
Aikido Security0%09Astra Security0%
Astra Security0%10Burp Suite0%
11Invicti0%
Invicti0%12Rapid7 InsightAppSec0%
Rapid7 InsightAppSec0%13HCL AppScan0%
HCL AppScan0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Burp Suite
38%
14 of 37 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Starts at ~$5,000/year and scales significantly with crawl concurrency... "generally out of reach for most small businesses."” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Invicti43%
16 of 37 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Enterprise-focused with quote-based pricing; best suited for large organizations with 300+ apps. Strong negative sentiment” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Acunetix47%
16 of 34 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“enterprise-grade with pricing that often requires custom quotes and scales poorly for small portfolios” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
HCL AppScan90%
9 of 10 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Legacy Enterprise "Heavyweights" ... Why to be cautious: Cost: Annual licensing frequently runs tens of thousands of dollars per application” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 729 links across 155 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 51 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Safeguard45 answers · 75 citations · 11 models
34 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
publisher (Gane)22 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
20 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 34 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Escape18 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Checkmarx18 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Corgea12 answers · 12 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
34 answers · 10 models
32 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 9 models
22 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best dast tool”, “dast tool”, “dast tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OWASP ZAP owasp.org | 51% | 194 | 3,600 | 122 | 365,222 | 1 | ||
| Intruder intruder.io | 17% | 291 | 27,100 | 8,557 | 49,562 | 43 | ||
| StackHawk stackhawk.com | 13% | 175 | 590 | 10 | 8,458 | 8 | 6 | |
| Acunetix acunetix.com | 8% | 92 | 880 | 43 | 15,291 | 10 | ||
| Probely probely.com | 4% | 27 | ||||||
| Detectify detectify.com | 2% | 94 | 590 | 4 | 1,393 | 15 | ||
| Nuclei nuclei.ai | 2% | 42 | 201,000 | 2,610 | ||||
| Escape escape.tech | 2% | 31 | 90,500 | 261,733 | 2,252 | $190 | 2 | 5 |
| OWASP ZAP – Zed Attack Proxy | 2% | |||||||
| Jit jit.io | 0% | 66 | 33,100 | 6,450 | 5,093 | 1 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkmarx.com, escape.tech, g2.com, safeguard.sh). The first result for “best dast tool” is snyk.io.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best DAST tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which dynamic web application security scanner would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top DAST tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best DAST tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a DAST tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which DAST tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Acunetixno first choiceChangedOWASP ZAPagainst: Burp Suite, InvictiOWASP ZAPIntruder, StackHawkagainst: Invicti, Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Three alternatives
HCL AppScan, Intruder, OWASP ZAPThree alternatives
Aikido Security, Intruder, StackHawkThree alternatives
Nikto, Nuclei, WapitiGPT-5.4 miniAcunetixagainst: Burp SuiteOWASP ZAPChangedOWASP ZAP, StackHawkOWASP ZAPno first choicenothing named
One alternative
OWASP ZAPTwo alternatives
Burp Suite DAST, InvictiThree alternatives
Acunetix, Burp Suite DAST, InvictiTwo alternatives
Burp Suite, StackHawkGemini 3.5 FlashStackHawkagainst: AcunetixProbelyChangedagainst: OWASP ZAPStackHawkagainst: Acunetix, InvictiNuclei, OWASP ZAPStackHawkagainst: Nuclei, OWASP ZAPagainst: Burp Suite, HCL AppScan, Micro Focus, Nikto, OpenText Fortify WebInspect, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Skipfish, Vega
Three alternatives
Nuclei, OWASP ZAP, ProbelyTwo alternatives
Invicti, StackHawkFour alternatives
Burp Suite, Nuclei, OWASP ZAP, SOOS DASTThree alternatives
Burp Suite, Probely, StackHawkThree alternatives
Acunetix, Bright Security, InvictiPerplexity SonarOWASP ZAPagainst: InvictiAcunetixChangedOWASP ZAP, StackHawkagainst: Checkmarx DAST, Veracode DASTOWASP ZAPno first choiceagainst: Acunetix, Checkmarx One, Invicti, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Veracode DAST
Four alternatives
Aikido Security, Detectify, Intruder, StackHawkFour alternatives
Escape, Invicti, OWASP ZAP, StackHawkFour alternatives
Acunetix, Burp Suite, Invicti, ProbelyOne alternative
StackHawkGrok 4.20Intruderagainst: OWASP ZAPProbelyChangedagainst: Acunetix, Invicti, OWASP ZAP, Rapid7 InsightAppSecOWASP ZAPagainst: Acunetix, HCL AppScan, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, SOOS DAST, Veracode DASTOWASP ZAPno first choiceagainst: Acunetix, Burp Suite, Checkmarx One, HCL AppScan, IBM AppScan, Invicti, OWASP ZAP, OpenText Fortify, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, Veracode DAST
Five alternatives
Aikido Security, Astra Security, Detectify, Probely, StackHawkTwo alternatives
Detectify, IntruderThree alternatives
Burp Suite, Probely, StackHawkFour alternatives
Burp Suite, Nikto, Nuclei, WapitiSeven alternatives
Acunetix, Detectify, Intruder, Invicti, OWASP ZAP, Probely, StackHawkMistral SmallOWASP ZAPOWASP ZAPHeldOWASP ZAPOWASP ZAPno first choiceagainst: Acunetix, Burp Suite, HCL AppScan, Invicti, Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Two alternatives
Intruder, StackHawkFour alternatives
Intruder, Jit, Probely, StackHawkOne alternative
IntruderDeepSeek V4 FlashIntruderOWASP ZAPChangedagainst: Invicti, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, Veracode DASTIntruder, OWASP ZAPagainst: Acunetix, Burp SuiteOWASP ZAPagainst: AcunetixEscape, StackHawkagainst: Acunetix, Burp Suite, Invicti, Qualys Web Application Scanningagainst: Acunetix, Aikido Security, Astra Security, Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, Fortify WebInspect, Invicti
Two alternatives
OWASP ZAP, StackHawkFour alternatives
Acunetix, Blacksight, Burp Suite, IntruderTwo alternatives
Jit, StackHawkTwo alternatives
Burp Suite, StackHawkTwo alternatives
Bright Security, OWASP ZAPLlama 4 MaverickOWASP ZAPOWASP ZAPHeldno first choiceOWASP ZAPno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Aikido Security, IntruderTwo alternatives
Intruder, StackHawkThree alternatives
Intruder, Nuclei, StackHawkQwen 3.7 FlashIntruderagainst: HCL AppScan, Tenable NessusOWASP ZAPChangedIntruder, OWASP ZAPOWASP ZAPagainst: Invicti, StackHawkIntruder, StackHawkagainst: OWASP ZAPagainst: Acunetix, Burp Suite, HCL AppScan, Veracode DAST
Three alternatives
OWASP ZAP, SOOS, StackHawkTwo alternatives
Invicti, StackHawkOne alternative
InvictiTwo alternatives
Burp Suite, ProjectDiscovery NucleiTwo alternatives
Escape, InvictiKimi K2OWASP ZAPDetectify, StackHawkChangedBlacksight, Jit, OWASP ZAPIntruder, OWASP ZAPno first choiceagainst: Aikido Security, Astra Security, Burp Suite, Checkmarx DAST, HCL AppScan, Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Three alternatives
Intruder, Probely, StackHawkTwo alternatives
Invicti, OWASP ZAPFour alternatives
Beagle Security, Burp Suite, Dastardly, Indusface WASTwo alternatives
Jit, NucleiEight alternatives
Acunetix, Astra Security, Burp Suite DAST, Escape, Invicti, OWASP ZAP, SOOS, StackHawkGLM 4.7 FlashXIntruderIntruder, OWASP ZAPChangedagainst: Acunetix, Burp SuiteOWASP ZAPOWASP ZAPno first choiceagainst: Acunetix, Burp Suite, Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, HCL AppScan, Invicti
Four alternatives
Astra Security, Burp Suite, Detectify, OWASP ZAPOne alternative
DetectifyThree alternatives
Burp Suite, Intruder, StackHawkFour alternatives
Burp Suite, Jit, Nuclei, StackHawkMiniMax M2.5OWASP ZAPAcunetixChangedagainst: Qualys Web Application ScanningNuclei, OWASP ZAPagainst: AcunetixOWASP ZAPno first choiceagainst: SonarQubeagainst: Burp Suite, Checkmarx DAST
Three alternatives
Acunetix, Beagle Security, InvictiThree alternatives
Burp Suite, Netsparker, OWASP ZAPFour alternatives
Beagle Security, Burp Suite, Invicti, JitThree alternatives
Aikido Security, Indusface WAS, ProbelyGPT-6 LunaStackHawkOWASP ZAPChangedOWASP ZAPagainst: InvictiOWASP ZAPno first choiceagainst: Burp, OWASP ZAP
One alternative
OWASP ZAPOne alternative
StackHawkThree alternatives
Burp Suite, Probely, StackHawkMuse Glimmer 30BIntruder, OWASP ZAPagainst: Burp SuiteOWASP ZAPChangedNuclei, OWASP ZAPagainst: Acunetix, InvictiOWASP ZAP – Zed Attack Proxyno first choiceagainst: Burp Suite, HCL AppScan, Invicti, OpenText Fortify, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, Tenable Web App Scanning
One alternative
StackHawkFour alternatives
Acunetix, Burp Suite, Detectify, ProbelyFour alternatives
Beagle Security, Burp Suite DAST, Intruder, StackHawkOne alternative
NucleiTwo alternatives
Acunetix, OZOWASP ZAPBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:09 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:39 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:37 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:08 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:33 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 19 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:52 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:02 | yes | 9 | 41 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 14 | 62 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:43 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:19 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:16 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:37 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:11 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:36 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 19:05 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:25 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:20 | yes | 8 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:09 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:27 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:41 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:32 | no | 0 | 103 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:19 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:43 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:13 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:16 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:19 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:31 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:55 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 22 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:09 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:04 | yes | 8 | 41 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:32 | yes | 22 | 56 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:49 | yes | 9 | 46 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:33 | yes | 6 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:05 | yes | 13 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:42 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:01 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:53 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:28 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 23 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:23 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:46 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 10 | 41 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:52 | yes | 1 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:24 | yes | 11 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:34 | yes | 16 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:52 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:53 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:49 | yes | 14 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:03 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:05 | yes | 21 | 57 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:52 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:54 | yes | 13 | 58 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:06 | yes | 18 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:49 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:28 | no | 0 | 101 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 19:39 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:36 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:38 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:40 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:35 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:30 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:01 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:37 | yes | 15 | 55 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:15 | yes | 23 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:29 | yes | 13 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:05 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:49 | yes | 3 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:33 | yes | 19 | 34 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aikido read as Aikido Security
Astra read as Astra Security
Checkmarx read as Checkmarx One
Qualys read as Qualys Web Application Scanning
Qualys WAS read as Qualys Web Application Scanning
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Rapid7 (InsightAppSec) read as Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Veracode read as Veracode DAST
Veracode Dynamic Analysis read as Veracode DAST
Unresolved, counted raw
BSBurp Suite (PortSwigger)
Burp
OWASP ZAP – Zed Attack Proxy
OZOWASP ZAP
ProjectDiscovery Nuclei
Qualys WAAS
Synopsys Seeker
Veracode Dynamic
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.