StackHawk vs Probely
Three of fourteen models named StackHawk first on the direct prompt; one named Probely. StackHawk was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Probely by six and StackHawk carries 41 labels and Probely 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the dynamic application security testing page.
By framing
StackHawkFirst choices, of fourteen modelsProbely
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
StackHawk Probely first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, StackHawk on the left and Probely on the right.The direct prompt
StackHawk first, Probely not the choice
3 of 14 modelsProbely was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Probely first, StackHawk an alternative
1 of 14 modelsStackHawk was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
StackHawk13%#3 of 13Probely4%#5 of 13StackHawk0%#12 of 14Probely0%#– of 14What the models said about StackHawk
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“its own docs acknowledge that scan results can include false positives, so findings still need review and confirmation” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“Modern mid-market / DevSecOps native | StackHawk, Escape, Bright (NeuraLegion)” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“the best DAST tool is usually StackHawk if your team is developer-driven” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“StackHawk — Best for Developer-Centric & Modern API-First B2B SaaS” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Probely
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Best Overall Value: Probely ... My top recommendation: Start with a trial of Probely or OWASP ZAP” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“Top-Rated Options (from 2023–2025 reviews): Probely, StackHawk, Rapid7 InsightAppSec” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · alternative
“StackHawk or Probely — Developer-friendly, strong CI/CD focus.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.