6 categories · RankedIntruder
Intruder is an exposure management platform that combines vulnerability management, attack surface monitoring and cloud security in one product · intruder.io ↗
Leads at small business. Thin evidence at enterprise: one label.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Ranked first. Next is Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management at 9%.
Rapid7 InsightVM is first at 33%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Tenable Vulnerability Management is first at 54%.
Why models recommend it
“Intruder is the clear leader with 49% first-choice share... That is the current model-consensus pick for general mid-market suitability.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, Intruder.io offers the best balance of affordability, ease of use, and comprehensive coverage.”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Intruder for SaaS simplicity and Greenbone Community Edition for zero licence cost are the most frequently recommended options”Muse Glimmer 30B · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“The highest-rated and most consistently recommended platforms based on my research include Intruder, Wiz, and Aikido Security”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Do you only want an automated scan (like Intruder or Acunetix)? *Warning: For true B2B credibility, you almost always need human-exploitable proof*”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Paraphrase question · warning
“Automated (e.g., Intruder, Acunetix): Faster and cheaper but prone to false positives and misses business logic flaws.”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Intruder, over the 298 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 1 | View → | |
| 54 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 53 | 20 | View → | |
| 50 | 18 | Compare → | |
| 50 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 48 | 10 | Compare → | |
| 47 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 42 | 14 | View → | |
| 42 | 13 | Compare → | |
| 41 | 8 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of Intruder →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Intruder's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- lean security teams
- Price stated
- Free $0 / forever; Cloud $239 / month or $2,870 annually; Pro $399 / month or $4,790 annually; Enterprise Custom
- Starting price
- 0
- Free plan or trial
- Try for free
- Integrations
- 15
- Certifications
- SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, Cyber Essentials, DORA
- Customers named
- Drata
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 291 of the 298 answers that named Intruder and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
466 of the 621 domain citations in answers naming Intruder came from a third party's page. Fifty-five were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Grok 4.20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 13 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 10 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 183 | 9 | 2026-09-21 | ASM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 73 | 2 | 2026-07-29 | ASM, MFA | |
| Comparison | 29 | 0 | 2026-05-11 | ASM | |
| Report or ebook | 18 | 2 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 15 | 0 | 2026-04-30 | ASM | |
| Case study | 9 | 0 | 2025-12-12 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2024-03-11 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-21What weve shipped lately september 2026 blog
- 2026-09-17Finding plesk rce by lying to ai report or ebook
- 2026-09-10How ai is changing the defenders toolkit blog
- 2026-09-10The most hyped cves of august 2026 what made noise whats being exploited blog
- 2026-08-20Api keys bank details disciplinary files what 28 000 exposed git repos gave up report or ebook
- 2026-08-18What weve shipped lately august 2026 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page intruder.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.