Index › IT › Security operations › PTaaS › Astra Security vs Intruder
Penetration testing as a service · November 2026 Edition

Astra Security vs Intruder

Two of fourteen models named Astra Security first on the direct prompt; zero named Intruder. Astra Security was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Intruder by eleven and Astra Security carries 24 labels and Intruder 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Astra Security

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Intruder

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share16%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%15%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#7A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels2413A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Astra Security reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Cobalt was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Cobalt vs Astra Security · Cobalt vs Intruder · Astra Security vs BreachLock

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the penetration testing as a service page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Astra SecurityFirst choices, of fourteen modelsIntruder
Direct20
Paraphrase301 against Intruder
Comparative401 against Intruder
Budget-constrained31
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Astra Security and Intruder were named in the same answer fifty times, of the 88 answers naming Astra Security and the 298 naming Intruder. In those answers Intruder took the first choice four times and Astra Security eighteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Astra Security and Intruder stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Astra Security Intruder first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Astra Security on the left and Intruder on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Astra Security and Intruder stood in it.

Astra Security first, Intruder an alternative

2 of 14 modelsIntruder was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GLM 4.7 FlashXAstra Security alternatives: Blaze InfoSec, Cobalt, SecurityMetrics
MiniMax M2.5Astra Security alternatives: BreachLock, Cobalt, Intruder, Stingrai

Neither was named

12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniNetSPI alternatives: Appsecco, Cobalt, HackerOne PTaaS, Packetlabs
Gemini 3.5 FlashCobalt alternatives: BreachLock, NetSPI, Synack
Perplexity SonarCobalt alternatives: Coalfire, NetSPI, Raxis, Stingrai
Grok 4.20BreachLock alternatives: Cobalt, Rapid7
Mistral SmallCobalt alternatives: BreachLock, NetSPI, Stingrai
DeepSeek V4 FlashBreachLock, Cobalt alternatives: Baker Tilly, Cherry Bekaert, RSM, Rapid7, Sprocket Security, Stingrai
Llama 4 MaverickCobalt
Qwen 3.7 FlashBishop Fox, Cobalt alternatives: HackerOne PTaaS, Lattice Security, NCC Group, Secureworks, TrustedSec
Kimi K2BreachLock, Cobalt alternatives: Stingrai
GPT-6 LunaCobalt alternatives: Bishop Fox, NetSPI
Muse Glimmer 30BCobalt alternatives: BreachLock, Bugcrowd PTaaS, HackerOne PTaaS, NetSPI, Rapid7, Stingrai, Synack

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Astra Security leads by seventeen points.
Astra Security17%#2 of 8
Intruder0%#7 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Astra Security leads by fourteen points.
Astra Security16%#2 of 12
Intruder2%#7 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Astra Security leads by two points.
Astra Security2%#– of 12
Intruder0%#– of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Astra Security

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“the strongest general recommendation for a mid-sized B2B company is Astra Security or Cobalt.io” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Astra Security or Cobalt.io would be the best starting points for most mid-sized B2B companies” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Known for its all-in-one platform, ideal for modern engineering teams and DevSecOps integration.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Intruder

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Do you only want an automated scan (like Intruder or Acunetix)? *Warning: For true B2B credibility, you almost always need human-exploitable proof*” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Automated (e.g., Intruder, Acunetix): Faster and cheaper but prone to false positives and misses business logic flaws.” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · soft negative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.