Intruder vs Raxis
Zero of fourteen models named Intruder first on the direct prompt; zero named Raxis. Intruder was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Raxis by six and Intruder carries 13 labels and Raxis 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in six categories this edition.
Raxis
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the penetration testing as a service page.
By framing
IntruderFirst choices, of fourteen modelsRaxisEvery model, every framing
| Model | DirectRA | ParaphraseRA | ComparativeRA | Budget-constrainedRA | Scale-constrainedRA | NegativeRA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | RA | RA | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | RA | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | RA | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | RA | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
IntruderRA Raxis first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Intruder on the left and Raxis on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Intruder0%#7 of 8Intruder2%#7 of 12Intruder0%#– of 12What the models said about Intruder
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Do you only want an automated scan (like Intruder or Acunetix)? *Warning: For true B2B credibility, you almost always need human-exploitable proof*” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Automated (e.g., Intruder, Acunetix): Faster and cheaper but prone to false positives and misses business logic flaws.” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · soft negative
What the models said about Raxis
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Raxis or Stingrai offer the best balance of real manual testing, transparent published pricing, and value” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Raxis: Top-rated for comprehensive, human-led testing with AI enhancements and continuous options.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“a boutique such as Atlant Security, Raxis, Packetlabs, or Secarma” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.