Astra Security vs BreachLock
Two of fourteen models named Astra Security first on the direct prompt; three named BreachLock. Astra Security was named by twelve of the fourteen models and BreachLock by twelve and Astra Security carries 24 labels and BreachLock 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the penetration testing as a service page.
By framing
Astra SecurityFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBreachLock
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Astra Security and BreachLock were named in the same answer forty-five times, of the 88 answers naming Astra Security and the 87 naming BreachLock. In those answers BreachLock took the first choice five times and Astra Security fourteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Astra Security BreachLock first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Astra Security on the left and BreachLock on the right.The direct prompt
Astra Security first, BreachLock an alternative
2 of 14 modelsBreachLock was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.BreachLock first, Astra Security not the choice
3 of 14 modelsAstra Security was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Astra Security17%#2 of 8BreachLock13%#4 of 8Astra Security16%#2 of 12BreachLock10%#3 of 12Astra Security2%#– of 12BreachLock2%#8 of 12What the models said about Astra Security
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“the strongest general recommendation for a mid-sized B2B company is Astra Security or Cobalt.io” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Astra Security or Cobalt.io would be the best starting points for most mid-sized B2B companies” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Known for its all-in-one platform, ideal for modern engineering teams and DevSecOps integration.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about BreachLock
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“BreachLock stands out as my top recommendation for a mid-sized B2B company seeking a Pentest-as-a-Service (PTaaS) provider.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For continuous security: Use a PTaaS provider like BreachLock or Cobalt.io integrated into your DevOps cycle.” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“PTaaS platforms like Cobalt or BreachLock offer the best balance of quality, ongoing coverage, and retesting flexibility” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.