BreachLock vs Bishop Fox
Three of fourteen models named BreachLock first on the direct prompt; one named Bishop Fox. BreachLock was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Bishop Fox by eleven and BreachLock carries 36 labels and Bishop Fox 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the penetration testing as a service page.
By framing
BreachLockFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBishop Fox
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, BreachLock and Bishop Fox were named in the same answer twenty-four times, of the 87 answers naming BreachLock and the 50 naming Bishop Fox. In those answers Bishop Fox took the first choice four times and BreachLock three.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
BreachLock Bishop Fox first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, BreachLock on the left and Bishop Fox on the right.The direct prompt
BreachLock first, Bishop Fox not the choice
3 of 14 modelsBishop Fox was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Bishop Fox first, BreachLock not the choice
1 of 14 modelsBreachLock was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
BreachLock13%#4 of 8Bishop Fox0%#– of 8BreachLock10%#3 of 12Bishop Fox2%#6 of 12Bishop Fox12%#4 of 12BreachLock2%#8 of 12What the models said about BreachLock
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“BreachLock stands out as my top recommendation for a mid-sized B2B company seeking a Pentest-as-a-Service (PTaaS) provider.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For continuous security: Use a PTaaS provider like BreachLock or Cobalt.io integrated into your DevOps cycle.” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“PTaaS platforms like Cobalt or BreachLock offer the best balance of quality, ongoing coverage, and retesting flexibility” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Bishop Fox
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Better for complex, high-risk environments, but likely more than a typical mid-sized company needs initially” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“widely regarded as one of the most technically capable boutique firms” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“High-risk, custom engagements | Specialist offensive-security consultancy focused on deep manual testing” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative
“Recognized for technical depth, manual testing, and a strong reputation in the security community.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.