Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › IT › Security operations › PTaaS › BreachLock vs NetSPI
Penetration testing as a service · November 2026 Edition

BreachLock vs NetSPI

Three of fourteen models named BreachLock first on the direct prompt; one named NetSPI. BreachLock was named by twelve of the fourteen models and NetSPI by twelve and BreachLock carries 36 labels and NetSPI 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.

BreachLock

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

NetSPI

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share10%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%9%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels3622A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, BreachLock reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Cobalt was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Cobalt vs BreachLock · Cobalt vs NetSPI · Astra Security vs BreachLock

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the penetration testing as a service page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
BreachLockFirst choices, of fourteen modelsNetSPI
Direct31
Paraphrase112 against NetSPI
Comparative32
Budget-constrained10
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, BreachLock and NetSPI were named in the same answer thirty times, of the 87 answers naming BreachLock and the 69 naming NetSPI. In those answers NetSPI took the first choice four times and BreachLock five.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where BreachLock and NetSPI stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
BreachLock NetSPI first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, BreachLock on the left and NetSPI on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where BreachLock and NetSPI stood in it.

BreachLock first, NetSPI not the choice

3 of 14 modelsNetSPI was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.20BreachLock alternatives: Cobalt, Rapid7
DeepSeek V4 FlashBreachLock, Cobalt alternatives: Baker Tilly, Cherry Bekaert, RSM, Rapid7, Sprocket Security, Stingrai
Kimi K2BreachLock, Cobalt alternatives: Stingrai

NetSPI first, BreachLock not the choice

1 of 14 modelsBreachLock was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniNetSPI alternatives: Appsecco, Cobalt, HackerOne PTaaS, Packetlabs

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashCobalt alternatives: BreachLock, NetSPI, Synack
Perplexity SonarCobalt alternatives: Coalfire, NetSPI, Raxis, Stingrai
Mistral SmallCobalt alternatives: BreachLock, NetSPI, Stingrai
MiniMax M2.5Astra Security alternatives: BreachLock, Cobalt, Intruder, Stingrai
GPT-6 LunaCobalt alternatives: Bishop Fox, NetSPI
Muse Glimmer 30BCobalt alternatives: BreachLock, Bugcrowd PTaaS, HackerOne PTaaS, NetSPI, Rapid7, Stingrai, Synack

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Llama 4 MaverickCobalt
Qwen 3.7 FlashBishop Fox, Cobalt alternatives: HackerOne PTaaS, Lattice Security, NCC Group, Secureworks, TrustedSec
GLM 4.7 FlashXAstra Security alternatives: Blaze InfoSec, Cobalt, SecurityMetrics

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
BreachLock leads by thirteen points.
BreachLock13%#4 of 8
NetSPI0%#– of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
BreachLock leads by six points.
BreachLock10%#3 of 12
NetSPI4%#5 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: NetSPI leads at enterprise.
NetSPI30%#1 of 12
BreachLock2%#8 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about BreachLock

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“BreachLock stands out as my top recommendation for a mid-sized B2B company seeking a Pentest-as-a-Service (PTaaS) provider.” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For continuous security: Use a PTaaS provider like BreachLock or Cobalt.io integrated into your DevOps cycle.” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“PTaaS platforms like Cobalt or BreachLock offer the best balance of quality, ongoing coverage, and retesting flexibility” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about NetSPI

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Better for complex, high-risk environments, but likely more than a typical mid-sized company needs initially” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“traditional firms like Rapid7 or NetSPI might feel less "as-a-service" for ongoing needs” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“I'd generally recommend NetSPI if you want the safest "default" choice for a mature PTaaS program” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Astra or NetSPI if you need a rigorous, manual audit that satisfies strict auditors” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“NetSPI is a strong default choice for mid-market-to-enterprise buyers” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
Cobalt vs BreachLockCobalt vs NetSPIAstra Security vs BreachLockAstra Security vs NetSPIBreachLock vs StingraiBreachLock vs Bishop FoxBreachLock vs IntruderBreachLock vs RaxisStingrai vs NetSPINetSPI vs Bishop FoxNetSPI vs IntruderNetSPI vs RaxisAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full ptaas standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.