NetSPI is a penetration testing as a service provider for organizations · netspi.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Stingrai is first at 22%.
Cobalt is first at 46%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first, contested: Synack has 16%.
“I'd generally recommend NetSPI if you want the safest "default" choice for a mature PTaaS program”GPT-5.4 mini · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Choose Astra or NetSPI if you need a rigorous, manual audit that satisfies strict auditors”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“NetSPI is a strong default choice for mid-market-to-enterprise buyers”GPT-5.4 mini · Direct question · first choice
“shortlist NetSPI or NCC Group for broad enterprise coverage”GPT-6 Luna · Comparative question · first choice
“Better for complex, high-risk environments, but likely more than a typical mid-sized company needs initially”Perplexity Sonar · Paraphrase question · warning
“traditional firms like Rapid7 or NetSPI might feel less "as-a-service" for ongoing needs”Grok 4.20 · Paraphrase question · warning
The products named in the same answers as NetSPI, over the 69 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 58 | 13 | Compare → | |
| 43 | 5 | View → | |
| 33 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 30 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 27 | 0 | View → | |
| 26 | 1 | View → | |
| 24 | 0 | View → | |
| 20 | 0 | View → | |
| 18 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 17 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of NetSPI →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on NetSPI's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 67 of the 69 answers that named NetSPI and are not a share of its labels.
187 of the 187 domain citations in answers naming NetSPI came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 781 | 13 | 2026-09-22 | ASM, PTaaS | |
| News or press | 417 | 2 | 2026-09-02 | ASM, PTaaS | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 133 | 2 | 2026-08-26 | ASM, EDR | |
| Podcast or video | 89 | 0 | 2026-06-24 | ||
| Conference or event | 41 | undated | |||
| Case study | 37 | 0 | 2026-01-05 | ASM | |
| Report or ebook | 20 | 0 | 2026-05-14 | PTaaS, ASM | |
| Comparison | 18 | 0 | 2026-03-30 | ASM | |
| Template or tool | 14 | 0 | 2025-03-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2022-03-16 | SASE |
Every page netspi.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.