7 categories · RankedTenable Vulnerability Management
Tenable Vulnerability Management is a vulnerability management platform for cybersecurity administrators and teams that want to find and reduce exposure · tenable.com ↗
Leads at enterprise. Ranked 4 of 82 for small business buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Intruder is first at 45%.
Rapid7 InsightVM is first at 33%. 4 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first. Next is Tenable One at 16%.
Why models recommend it
“Excellent broad coverage (network, cloud, OT, containers), strong prioritization with threat intel, compliance reporting. Good for hybrid setups; often tops "best overall" lists.”Grok 4.20 · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“Tenable Nessus and Tenable Vulnerability Management rank as the best overall solution due to strong integrations and comprehensive capabilities.”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Comparative question · first choice
“Tenable Vulnerability Management is the top all-around choice due to its comprehensive coverage and strong market reputation”Mistral Small · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Choose Tenable due to its deep asset coverage and legacy scanning reliability across non-standard environments.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Avoid: Tenable unless you have specific needs for OT/legacy asset coverage and budget for $10K+ annually.”Kimi K2 · Direct question · warning
“Vendors to watch out for: Traditional tools like Tenable and Qualys historically rely on IP/asset tracking that can become expensive or frustrating to manage”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Tenable or Qualys when remediation automation is a core requirement: Both are strong detection platforms, but remediation may require additional products”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“The platform can be overwhelming for smaller teams, with users reporting "too many features and configuration options"”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Tenable Vulnerability Management, over the 196 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 163 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 144 | 17 | Compare → | |
| 83 | 13 | Compare → | |
| 61 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 48 | 20 | Compare → | |
| 47 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 32 | 0 | View → | |
| 30 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 29 | 2 | View → | |
| 22 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Tenable Vulnerability Management →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Tenable Vulnerability Management's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- 脆弱性管理を始めたばかりの担当者、サイバーセキュリティ管理者、エクスポージャー削減のために脆弱性管理プラットフォームの購入を検討している方
- Price stated
- 1 Year $3,500 2 Years $6,825 3 Years $9,975
- Starting price
- 3500
- Free plan or trial
- Try for free
- Customers named
- HCL Software
- Also from Tenable
- Tenable ASM / Tenable One, Tenable Attack Surface Management, Tenable Cloud Security, Tenable Nessus, Tenable OT, Tenable OT Security and 8 more
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 154 of the 196 answers that named Tenable Vulnerability Management and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
367 of the 414 domain citations in answers naming Tenable Vulnerability Management came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 12 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |