Tenable Attack Surface Management is a product for discovering and managing an organization's external attack surface, including internet-facing assets · tenable.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Intruder is first at 35%.
Intruder is first at 29%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Cortex Xpanse is first at 44%.
“I'd usually recommend Tenable One Attack Surface Management as the default starting point”GPT-5.4 mini · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Tenable One Attack Surface Management link external findings to existing vulnerability and exposure management workflows”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · alternative
“suits organizations that have already invested in the Tenable vulnerability management ecosystem”MiniMax M2.5 · Comparative question · alternative
“Choose Tenable or Rapid7 when ASM must extend an existing vulnerability-management program.”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · alternative
“economically attractive when you already use the corresponding ecosystem, but avoid assuming that an existing EDR or vulnerability-management deployment automatically provides complete external discovery”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“they can feel complex and expensive for mid-sized teams (better suited to enterprises with dedicated resources)”Grok 4.20 · Paraphrase question · warning
“Users note room for improvement in integration with other tools”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Enterprises wanting detailed, continuous vulnerability insight”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Scale-constrained question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Tenable Attack Surface Management, over the 81 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 66 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 58 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 53 | 25 | Compare → | |
| 39 | 2 | Compare → | |
| 29 | 5 | View → | |
| 29 | 0 | View → | |
| 24 | 3 | View → | |
| 17 | 1 | View → | |
| 15 | 7 | Compare → | |
| 15 | 1 | View → |
What the models named instead of Tenable Attack Surface Management →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Tenable Attack Surface Management's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 77 of the 81 answers that named Tenable Attack Surface Management and are not a share of its labels.
216 of the 232 domain citations in answers naming Tenable Attack Surface Management came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |