Detectify is an application security platform for security teams, with products for Application Scanning and Surface Monitoring · detectify.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
OWASP ZAP is first at 51%.
Invicti is first at 33%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Invicti is first at 58%.
“Best for vulnerability scanning rather than browser-script protection: Detectify, which is described as a cost-effective monitoring choice”Perplexity Sonar · Budget-constrained question · alternative
“Best for security teams that want to continuously discover exploitable client‑side weaknesses”MiniMax M2.5 · Comparative question · alternative
“Use modern AI-assisted DAST tools (Bright Security, Invicti, Checkmarx DAST, Detectify)”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · alternative
“Excellent if your B2B business relies heavily on web apps, APIs, or dynamic sites”Grok 4.20 · Paraphrase question · alternative
“Do not buy these expecting broad organization-wide ASM.”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“pure crawlers (e.g., some vulnerability scanners like Detectify) are sometimes grouped here but are generally considered lighter-weight”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Detectify, over the 97 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 27 | View → | |
| 32 | 12 | View → | |
| 28 | 7 | View → | |
| 27 | 3 | View → | |
| 22 | 8 | View → | |
| 21 | 2 | View → | |
| 21 | 1 | View → | |
| 21 | 0 | View → | |
| 20 | 5 | View → | |
| 20 | 3 | View → |
What the models named instead of Detectify →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Detectify's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 94 of the 97 answers that named Detectify and are not a share of its labels.
236 of the 236 domain citations in answers naming Detectify came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 371 | 4 | 2026-08-19 | ASM, WAF | |
| News or press | 53 | 2 | 2026-09-24 | ASM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 35 | 1 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Report or ebook | 18 | 0 | 2025-10-07 | ASM | |
| Comparison | 15 | 0 | 2026-06-11 | ||
| Podcast or video | 14 | 0 | 2022-03-17 | ||
| Case study | 10 | 2 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | undated | ASM | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
As the event pages on detectify.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page detectify.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.