CI/CD platforms for small business buyers
Asked as “CI/CD platform”, and as “continuous integration and delivery tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 59 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
88%
Clear leader
88GitHub Actions08GitLab CI/CD03CircleCI
88% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+13Since October 2026: 75% → 88%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.GitHub Actions held the lead, +13 points on 75%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
GitHub Actions88%Clear leader▲+13Since October 2026: 75% → 88%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageMid-marketGitHub Actions70%Clear leader▲+2Since October 2026: 68% → 70%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
GitLab CI/CD54%Clear leader▲+12Since October 2026: 42% → 54%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →
GitHub Actions88%Clear leader▲+13Since October 2026: 75% → 88%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageMid-marketGitHub Actions70%Clear leader▲+2Since October 2026: 68% → 70%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseGitLab CI/CD54%Clear leader▲+12Since October 2026: 42% → 54%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01GitHub Actions88%1%81endorsed leader▲+13Since October 2026: 75% → 88%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.75% → 88%
GitHub Actions88%1%81endorsed leader▲+13Since October 2026: 75% → 88%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.75% → 88%02GitLab CI/CD8%6%79accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 15% → 8%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 8%
GitLab CI/CD8%6%79accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 15% → 8%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 8%03
CircleCI3%12%68accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 5% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 3%
CircleCI3%12%68accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 5% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 3%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10
Jenkins0%79%58criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Jenkins0%79%58criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Travis CI0%77%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Travis CI0%77%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Azure DevOps0%38%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Azure DevOps0%38%16criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
Azure Pipelines0%33%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Azure Pipelines0%33%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%06
Bitbucket Pipelines0%17%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Bitbucket Pipelines0%17%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%05
Buildkite0%13%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Buildkite0%13%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%04
Semaphore0%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Semaphore0%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
One product takes 88% of first choices here, so the chart would put nine markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Four products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Thirteen of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Jenkins79%
46 of 58 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 21 hard negative
“*Avoid Jenkins if you have a tight budget and a small team*—Jenkins requires significant maintenance, server resources, and setup time.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
Harness89%
8 of 9 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“can become a burden at small scale, requiring more attention than a small team can typically provide” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Travis CI77%
10 of 13 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Travis CI: Market position has weakened significantly; many teams are migrating away.” Kimi K2, scale prompt
CircleCI12%
8 of 68 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“Usage-priced CI if your build volume is hard to predict. CircleCI, for example, charges credits... That can work well, but estimate a typical month and a busy month before committing.” GPT-6 Luna, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
64 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 13 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 639 links across 171 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 1 model searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition. 44 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
25 answers · 37 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 38 citations · 9 models
22 answers · 25 citations · 7 models
vendor site · CircleCI19 answers · 28 citations · 7 models
publisher (Gane)18 answers · 21 citations · 7 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · GitHub14 answers · 19 citations · 6 models
vendor site · GitLab14 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Northflank12 answers · 12 citations · 6 models
11 answers · 11 citations · 5 models
10 answers · 13 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
21 answers · 7 models
18 answers · 7 models
18 answers · 7 models
18 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 4 models
11 answers · 6 models
11 answers · 5 models
10 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best ci/cd platform”, “ci/cd platform”, “ci/cd platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub parent site GitHub Actions 88% | 88% | 181 | 1,500,000 | 31,479 | ||||
| GitLab gitlab.com GitLab CI/CD 8% | 8% | 186 | 90,500 | 4,844 | 603,028 company | $884 | 66 | 5 |
| CircleCI circleci.com | 3% | 140 | 4,400 | 207 | 133,932 | 24 | ||
| Semaphore semaphore.io | 0% | 23 | 33,100 | 1,294 | 12,064 | 2 | ||
| Buildkite buildkite.com | 0% | 57 | 3,600 | 98 | 3,563 | $477 | 0 | |
| Bitbucket Pipelines bitbucket.org | 0% | 28 | 590 | 97 | 22,601 | |||
| Buddy | 0% | |||||||
| Azure parent site Azure Pipelines 0%, Azure DevOps 0% | 0% | 162 | 301,000 | 47,904 | ||||
| Drone CI drone.io | 0% | 9 | ||||||
| Vercel vercel.app | 0% | 16 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 16 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (about.gitlab.com, blog.jetbrains.com, github.com, thectoclub.com). The first result for “best ci/cd platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best CI/CD platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which continuous integration and delivery tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top CI/CD platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best CI/CD platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a CI/CD platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which CI/CD platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5CircleCI, GitHub Actionsagainst: JenkinsCircleCI, GitHub ActionsHeldGitHub Actionsagainst: JenkinsGitHub Actionsagainst: Jenkinsno first choiceagainst: Nortal, Pentamix Security, Travis CI, Tribloom
One alternative
GitLab CI/CDThree alternatives
CircleCI, DeployHQ, GitLab CI/CDTwo alternatives
Buildkite, GitLab CI/CDGPT-5.4 miniGitHub ActionsGitHub ActionsHeldGitHub ActionsGitHub Actionsno first choiceagainst: AWS CodePipeline, Azure Pipelines, Bitbucket Pipelines, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CD
Two alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDThree alternatives
AWS CodePipeline, Azure Pipelines, CircleCIThree alternatives
Bitbucket Pipelines, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDTwo alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDGemini 3.5 FlashGitHub Actionsagainst: Argo CD, Jenkins, TektonGitHub ActionsHeldagainst: JenkinsGitHub Actionsagainst: JenkinsGitHub Actionsagainst: JenkinsGitHub Actionsagainst: AWS CodeBuild, AWS CodePipeline, Argo Workflows, CircleCI, Jenkins, Spinnaker, Tekton, Travis CI
Three alternatives
Bitbucket Pipelines, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDThree alternatives
Bitbucket Pipelines, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDFour alternatives
Bitbucket Pipelines, Buildkite, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDSix alternatives
CircleCI, Cloudflare Pages, GitLab CI/CD, Netlify, Vercel, Woodpecker CIThree alternatives
Buildkite, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDPerplexity SonarGitHub Actionsagainst: JenkinsGitHub ActionsHeldagainst: JenkinsGitHub Actionsagainst: JenkinsGitHub Actionsagainst: JenkinsGitHub Actionsagainst: Jenkinsagainst: AWS CodeBuild, Azure Pipelines, CircleCI, CloudBees CI, GitLab Premium or self-managed GitLab, Harness, Jenkins, Travis CI
Four alternatives
Bitbucket Pipelines, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CD, SemaphoreThree alternatives
Azure Pipelines, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDFour alternatives
Azure Pipelines, Bitbucket Pipelines, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDTwo alternatives
GitLab CI/CD, SemaphoreFour alternatives
Azure DevOps, Buildkite, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDGrok 4.20GitHub ActionsGitHub ActionsHeldagainst: JenkinsGitHub Actionsagainst: Buildkite, Jenkins, Travis CIGitHub Actionsagainst: Atlassian Bamboo, Harness, JetBrains TeamCityGitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CDagainst: Jenkinsagainst: AWS CodeBuild, Atlassian Bamboo, Azure Pipelines, BuildJet, CircleCI, Earthly, Google Cloud Build, Jenkins, JetBrains TeamCity, Travis CI
Two alternatives
GitLab CI/CD, SemaphoreSix alternatives
AWS CodePipeline, Azure DevOps, Buddy, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CD, SemaphoreFour alternatives
Azure Pipelines, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CD, SemaphoreTwo alternatives
GitLab CI/CD, JenkinsFour alternatives
Azure DevOps, Buildkite, CircleCI, HarnessMistral SmallGitHub ActionsGitHub ActionsHeldGitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CDagainst: AWS CodePipeline, Azure Pipelines, Google Cloud BuildGitHub Actionsno first choiceagainst: Jenkinsagainst: Azure DevOps, Bitbucket Pipelines, Codefresh, Harness, Jenkins, JetBrains TeamCity
One alternative
GitLab CI/CDTwo alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDTwo alternatives
CircleCI, JenkinsOne alternative
GitLab CI/CDDeepSeek V4 FlashGitHub ActionsGitHub ActionsHeldGitHub Actionsagainst: JenkinsGitHub Actionsagainst: JenkinsGitHub Actionsagainst: Jenkinsagainst: Atlassian Bamboo, Azure DevOps, Bitbucket Pipelines, Codefresh, GitLab CI/CD, Harness, Jenkins, JetBrains TeamCity
Three alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CD, SemaphoreTwo alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDThree alternatives
Buildkite, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDTwo alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDThree alternatives
Buildkite, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDLlama 4 MaverickGitHub ActionsGitHub ActionsHeldGitHub ActionsGitHub Actionsno first choiceagainst: Codefresh, Harness, Jenkins
Three alternatives
AWS CodePipeline, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDThree alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CD, SemaphoreQwen 3.7 FlashGitHub ActionsGitHub ActionsHeldagainst: JenkinsGitHub Actionsagainst: JenkinsGitHub Actionsagainst: JenkinsGitHub Actionsagainst: Azure DevOps, Buildkite, Jenkinsagainst: Azure DevOps, BuildJet, Earthly, IBM Cloud Pak, Jenkins, Octopus Deploy
Two alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDTwo alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDTwo alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDOne alternative
GitLab CI/CDTwo alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDKimi K2GitHub ActionsGitHub ActionsHeldagainst: CircleCI, JenkinsGitHub Actionsagainst: Jenkins, Travis CIGitHub Actionsagainst: JenkinsGitHub Actionsagainst: Azure DevOps, Jenkins, Travis CIagainst: CircleCI, GitLab CI/CD, Jenkins, Travis CI
Four alternatives
Azure Pipelines, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CD, SemaphoreOne alternative
GitLab CI/CDThree alternatives
Bitbucket Pipelines, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDOne alternative
GitLab CI/CDThree alternatives
Buildkite, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDGLM 4.7 FlashXGitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CDagainst: JenkinsGitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CDHeldGitHub Actionsagainst: JenkinsGitHub Actionsagainst: JenkinsGitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CDagainst: Azure Pipelines, Jenkins, JetBrains TeamCityagainst: Azure DevOps, Buildkite, Harness, Jenkins, Octopus Deploy, Scalr, Spinnaker, Travis CI
Two alternatives
Azure Pipelines, CircleCIOne alternative
CircleCIFive alternatives
Azure Pipelines, Buildkite, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CD, SemaphoreTwo alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDOne alternative
CircleCIMiniMax M2.5GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CDGitHub ActionsChangedGitHub ActionsGitHub ActionsGitHub Actionsagainst: Harness, Jenkins X, Spinnakeragainst: AWS CodeBuild, Azure Pipelines, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CD, Jenkins, Travis CI
Two alternatives
CircleCI, SemaphoreThree alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CD, JenkinsFive alternatives
Buddy, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CD, Jenkins, SemaphoreFour alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CD, Jenkins, SemaphoreTwo alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDGPT-6 LunaGitHub ActionsGitHub ActionsHeldGitHub Actionsagainst: JenkinsGitHub ActionsGitHub Actionsagainst: CircleCI, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD, Jenkins
Two alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDOne alternative
GitLab CI/CDFour alternatives
Bitbucket Pipelines, Buildkite, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDOne alternative
GitLab CI/CDThree alternatives
Buildkite, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDMuse Glimmer 30BGitHub ActionsGitHub ActionsHeldGitHub Actionsagainst: JenkinsGitHub ActionsGitHub Actionsagainst: Jenkinsagainst: Argo CD, CodePipeline, Flux, Harness, Jenkins, Spinnaker
Two alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDOne alternative
GitLab CI/CDFour alternatives
Buildkite, CircleCI, GitLab CI/CD, SemaphoreFive alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CD, Jenkins, Semaphore, Woodpecker CITwo alternatives
CircleCI, GitLab CI/CDBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:01 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:46 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:55 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:10 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:02 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 18 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:21 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:39 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 15 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 10 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:27 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:54 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:32 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:58 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:28 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:28 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 25 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:20 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:12 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:17 | no | 0 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:31 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:19 | no | 0 | 75 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 2 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:29 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 16 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:01 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:44 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:21 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:56 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:40 | yes | 15 | 63 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:01 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 6 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:04 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:57 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:19 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:37 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:10 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:25 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:30 | yes | 24 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:27 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 19:26 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:30 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:18 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:21 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:14 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:51 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:36 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 20 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:20 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:30 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:38 | no | 0 | 43 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:32 | yes | 13 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:22 | no | 0 | 98 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:39 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:36 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:21 | yes | 6 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:42 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:04 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:00 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:24 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:47 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:40 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:03 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:24 | yes | 19 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:10 | yes | 25 | 56 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:50 | yes | 13 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CloudBees read as CloudBees CI
Drone read as Drone CI
GitLab read as GitLab CI/CD
GitLab CI read as GitLab CI/CD
GitLab Premium read as GitLab CI/CD
GitLab.com read as GitLab CI/CD
Unresolved, counted raw
Cirrus CI
GitLab Premium or self-managed GitLab
Nortal
Pentamix Security
Tribloom
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.