Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › IT › Developer platform › Error monitoring › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Error and crash monitoring for small business buyers

Asked as “error monitoring tool”, and as “application error and crash reporting service”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
76%
Sentry
Clear leader
76Sentry13Honeybadger04Rollbar07others

76% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▲+7Since October 2026: 69% → 76%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Sentry held the lead, +7 points on 69%, inside the 11-point floor.
ShowinginAll 136 categories →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small businessSentry76%Clear leader▲+7Since October 2026: 69% → 76%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageMid-marketSentry76%Clear leader=heldSince October 2026: 76% → 76%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseSentry61%Clear leader▼−14Since October 2026: 75% → 61%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Sentry76%3%78endorsed leader▲+7Since October 2026: 69% → 76%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.69% → 76%
02Honeybadger13%0%59accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 20% → 13%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.20% → 13%
03Rollbar4%3%65accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
04Bugsnag2%9%57accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
05GlitchTip2%10%29accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
06PostHog2%18%11accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10Dynatrace0%90%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12New Relic Errors Inbox0%86%21criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11Datadog Error Tracking0%64%36criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09LogRocket0%47%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08Raygun0%32%19criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
07Airbrake0%12%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Build your shortlist
Head to head
Sentry vs RollbarSentry vs BugsnagSentry vs GlitchTip
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Sentry vs Datadog Error TrackingRollbar vs BugsnagRollbar vs GlitchTipRollbar vs Datadog Error TrackingBugsnag vs GlitchTipBugsnag vs Datadog Error TrackingGlitchTip vs Datadog Error Tracking

One product takes 76% of first choices here, so the chart would put eleven markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Five products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.

What they warned about

Ten of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Datadog Error Tracking
64%
23 of 36 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Tools like Datadog, New Relic, and Dynatrace are often criticized for being overly complex, expensive, and not user-friendly for small teams.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
New Relic Errors Inbox
86%
18 of 21 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Avoid starting here unless you genuinely need coordinated metrics, logs, traces, infrastructure monitoring, and APM.” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Dynatrace
90%
9 of 10 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Why to avoid: Consistently cited as having the steepest learning curve in the industry and being the most expensive option.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
LogRocket
47%
8 of 17 labels negative · 8 of 14 models
“may not be the best fit for small businesses due to their high negative rates or being criticized as challengers” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

70 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 700 links across 140 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 50 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

ones.com
vendor site · ONES.com33 answers · 48 citations · 9 models
sentry.io
vendor site · Sentry33 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
rollbar.com
vendor site · Rollbar19 answers · 29 citations · 7 models
dupple.com
19 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
dev.to
18 answers · 30 citations · 8 models
gane.ai/index
publisher (Gane)17 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
drdroid.io
17 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
honeybadger.io
vendor site · Honeybadger16 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
toolradar.com
16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
guideflow.com
vendor site · Guideflow15 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
g2.com
vendor site · G212 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
posthog.com
vendor site · PostHog12 answers · 13 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

ones.com/blog/8-best-error-tracking-tools-to-catch-bugs-before-users-do
26 answers · 9 models
drdroid.io/engineering-tools/error-monitoring-tracking-open-source
17 answers · 7 models
dupple.com/learn/best-error-tracking-software
16 answers · 8 models
gane.ai/index/it/developer/error-and-crash-monitoring/smb
16 answers · 10 models
sentry.io/
16 answers · 6 models
guideflow.com/blog/error-monitoring-software
15 answers · 6 models
toolradar.com/guides/best-error-tracking-software
15 answers · 8 models
sentry.io/pricing
12 answers · 5 models
ones.com/blog/error-reporting-software-comparison-8-tools-worth-trying
10 answers · 6 models
posthog.com/compare/best-error-tracking-tools
10 answers · 5 models

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best error monitoring tool”, “error monitoring tool”, “error monitoring tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsGoogle ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Sentry sentry.io
Sentry 76%, Sentry Developer 0%		76%26690,50021,086254,6861201
Honeybadger honeybadger.io13%100201,0009813,851
Rollbar rollbar.com4%1685,40017512,38255
Bugsnag bugsnag.com2%1541,600231,51246
GlitchTip glitchtip.com2%5459092508
Better Stack betterstack.com2%3111,6001,01741,811119
PostHog posthog.com2%3133,10027125,9361208
Airbrake airbrake.io0%395,40016410,122
Firebase firebase.google.com
Firebase Crashlytics 0%		0%1890,5003,43791,247 company
Bugsink bugsink.com0%51401403

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 13 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (posthog.com, rollbar.com, sentry.io). The first result for “best error monitoring tool” is sentry.io.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best error monitoring tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which application error and crash reporting service would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top error monitoring tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best error monitoring tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an error monitoring tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which error monitoring tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Honeybadger
Four alternativesRaygun, Rollbar, Scout Monitoring, Sentry
SentryChanged
Two alternativesBugsnag, Rollbar
against: Datadog Error TrackingHoneybadger
Three alternativesGlitchTip, Rollbar, Sentry
Honeybadger
Three alternativesAirbrake, Better Stack, GlitchTip
no first choiceagainst: Datadog Error Tracking, Dynatrace, FullStory, LogRocket, New Relic Errors Inbox, TrackJS
GPT-5.4 miniSentry
Two alternativesBugsnag, Rollbar
SentryHeld
Two alternativesBugsnag, Rollbar
against: Datadog Error TrackingSentry
Three alternativesBugsnag, Honeybadger, Rollbar
Rollbar
Two alternativesBugsnag, Sentry
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashSentry
Four alternativesHighlight.io, Honeybadger, LogRocket, Rollbar
SentryHeld
Three alternativesHighlight.io, Honeybadger, LogRocket
Sentry
Five alternativesBugsnag, GlitchTip, Highlight.io, Honeybadger, LogRocket
Sentry
Six alternativesAWS CloudWatch Application Signals, Azure Application Insights, Bugsink, GlitchTip, Google Cloud Error Reporting, Honeybadger
Sentry
Four alternativesBugsnag, Highlight.io, Honeybadger, LogRocket
against: Datadog Error Tracking, New Relic Errors Inboxagainst: AppDynamics, Datadog Error Tracking, Dynatrace, New Relic Errors Inbox, Splunk, Splunk Observability Cloud
Perplexity SonarSentry
Three alternativesBetter Stack, Honeybadger, Rollbar
against: Datadog Error TrackingSentryHeld
Two alternativesFirebase Crashlytics, Honeybadger
Honeybadger, Sentry
Two alternativesBugsnag, Rollbar
against: Datadog Error Tracking, New Relic Errors Inbox, RaygunSentry
Three alternativesBugsnag, Honeybadger, Rollbar
no first choiceagainst: Airbrake, Bugsnag, Datadog Error Tracking, Dynatrace, Firebase Crashlytics, GlitchTip, Highlight.io, LogRocket, New Relic Errors Inbox, Rollbar, Sentry
Grok 4.20Sentry
Four alternativesBugsnag, Honeybadger, PostHog, Rollbar
against: MonoscopeSentryHeld
Three alternativesBugsnag, Honeybadger, Rollbar
Honeybadger, Sentry
Three alternativesAirbrake, Bugsnag, Rollbar
against: Errbit, OverOps, RaygunHoneybadger, Sentry
One alternativeRollbar
against: AppSignal, Bugsnag, Datadog Error Tracking, GlitchTip, New Relic Errors Inbox, PostHogSentry
Five alternativesBugsnag, Datadog Error Tracking, Honeybadger, Rollbar, Scout APM
against: AppDynamics, Datadog Error Tracking, Dynatrace, Elastic Stack, IBM, New Relic Errors Inbox, Oracle, Splunk
Mistral SmallSentry
Three alternativesBugsnag, Honeybadger, Rollbar
Bugsnag, SentryChanged
Two alternativesGlitchTip, Rollbar
Firebase Crashlytics, Honeybadger
Two alternativesRollbar, Sentry
against: Datadog Error Tracking, New Relic Errors InboxRollbar, Sentry
Two alternativesBugsnag, GlitchTip
no first choiceagainst: Datadog Error Tracking, Dynatrace, FullStory, LogRocket, New Relic Errors Inbox
DeepSeek V4 FlashSentry
Four alternativesBugsnag, Honeybadger, PostHog, Rollbar
against: Datadog Error Tracking, New Relic Errors InboxSentryHeld
Two alternativesGlitchTip, Honeybadger
Sentry
Five alternativesBugsnag, Honeybadger, PostHog, Raygun, Rollbar
Sentry
Three alternativesBugsnag, PostHog, Rollbar
Sentry
Three alternativesHoneybadger, PostHog, Rollbar
against: Datadog Error Tracking, Dynatrace, LogRocket, New Relic Errors Inbox, Raygun, Uptime.com
Llama 4 MaverickHoneybadger
Four alternativesBetter Stack, Bugsnag, Rollbar, Sentry
SentryChangedSentry
Four alternativesBugsnag, Datadog Error Tracking, Honeybadger, Rollbar
Sentry
Three alternativesBugsnag, Honeybadger, Rollbar
no first choiceagainst: Datadog Error Tracking, LogRocket, New Relic Errors Inbox
Qwen 3.7 FlashSentry
Two alternativesHoneybadger, Rollbar
SentryHeld
Four alternativesBugsnag, Honeybadger, PostHog, Rollbar
Sentry
Three alternativesBugsnag, Honeybadger, Rollbar
against: Datadog Error Tracking, New Relic Errors InboxHoneybadger
Three alternativesGlitchTip, Rollbar, Sentry
Sentry
Two alternativesDatadog Error Tracking, Honeybadger
against: Bugsnag, Datadog Error Tracking, Dynatrace, GlitchTip, Highlight.io, New Relic Errors Inbox
Kimi K2Sentry
Three alternativesBugsnag, Raygun, Rollbar
SentryHeld
Two alternativesFirebase Crashlytics, Rollbar
Honeybadger, Rollbar
Four alternativesBugsnag, GlitchTip, LogRocket, Sentry
against: AirbrakeSentry
One alternativeRollbar
Honeybadger, Sentry
One alternativeGlitchTip
against: Datadog Error Tracking, LogRocket, New Relic Errors Inbox, Sentry
GLM 4.7 FlashXSentry
Three alternativesBugsnag, Monoscope, Rollbar
SentryHeld
Two alternativesBetter Stack, Bugsnag
Sentry
Six alternativesBetter Stack, Bugsnag, GlitchTip, Honeybadger, LogRocket, Rollbar
against: RaygunSentry
Seven alternativesBetter Stack, Bugsink, Errbit, GlitchTip, Honeybadger, PostHog, Rollbar
Sentry
Four alternativesBugsnag, Datadog Error Tracking, LogRocket, Rollbar
against: Amplitude, AppDynamics, Datadog Error Tracking, Dynatrace, Elastic Stack, Grafana Loki, Mixpanel, New Relic Errors Inbox, PostHog, Splunk
MiniMax M2.5Honeybadger, Sentry
Two alternativesAirbrake, Rollbar
SentryChanged
Three alternativesBugsnag, Honeybadger, Rollbar
Sentry
Two alternativesFirebase Crashlytics, Rollbar
against: Datadog Error Tracking, New Relic Errors InboxSentry
Two alternativesAirbrake, Rollbar
no first choiceagainst: Datadog Error Tracking, LogRocket, New Relic Errors Inbox
GPT-6 LunaSentry
One alternativeHoneybadger
SentryHeld
Two alternativesDatadog Error Tracking, Rollbar
Sentry
Four alternativesBugsnag, Datadog Error Tracking, Honeybadger, Rollbar
GlitchTip
Two alternativesHoneybadger, Sentry
Sentry
Four alternativesBugsnag, Datadog Error Tracking, Honeybadger, Rollbar
against: Bugsnag, Datadog Error Tracking, Rollbar
Muse Glimmer 30BSentry
Three alternativesBugsnag, Honeybadger, Rollbar
SentryHeld
One alternativeHoneybadger
Sentry
Four alternativesBugsnag, GlitchTip, Honeybadger, Rollbar
against: RaygunBetter Stack, PostHog
Four alternativesBugsnag, GlitchTip, Rollbar, Sentry Developer
no first choiceagainst: AppDynamics, Bugsnag, Datadog Error Tracking, Dynatrace, LogRocket, Raygun
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 18:46yes108 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 19:19yes45 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 13:18no015 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:14yes103 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:48yes510 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:36yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:55yes1919 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:09yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:36yes526 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:44yes1519 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:58yes1572 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:10yes1333 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 13:16yes312 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:25yes1420 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 19:09no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:06yes05 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:50no016 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 17:51yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:07yes58 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 18:22no02 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:48yes2422 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:31yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 18:23yes514 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 17:44yes1017 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:43yes2356 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 17:19yes519 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:54yes214 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:13yes1312 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 19:20yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:38yes67 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:48no013 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:17yes105 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:49yes1014 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:27yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 19:04yes1748 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:29yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 14:13no030 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:25yes1844 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:32yes1598 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 18:36yes516 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 17:21yes625 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:42yes1332 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 15:50yes108 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:22yes55 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:49yes722 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:36yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:37yes109 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:09yes526 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:54yes1516 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:13yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:14yes520 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:10yes511 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:14yes1430 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 17:20yes526 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:53yes213 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:14yes1421 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:44no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:11no05 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 19:43no016 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:54yes106 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:44yes512 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:28no05 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:58yes2351 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:41yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:55no030 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:14yes1529 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:03yes1019 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:20yes542 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:18yes418 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:52yes1520 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:51yes199 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:46no03 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:02no012 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 18:09yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 18:05yes510 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:56yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:14yes2531 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:06yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:21yes549 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:40yes2536 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 17:03yes1077 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:21yes1540 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:09yes424 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:31yes2434 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Datadog read as Datadog Error Tracking
New Relic read as New Relic Errors Inbox
New Relic (Full-Stack) read as New Relic Errors Inbox
New Relic (including Errors Inbox) read as New Relic Errors Inbox
Unresolved, counted raw
Laravel Telescope
OverOps
Sentry Developer
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.

Also in developer platform

The other categories of this function, with the leader in each.
← DASTFeature flags →